Biden had a goal of 30GW of U.S. offshore wind capacity by
2030. The rising cost of borrowing and inflation caused many of these heavily
subsidized projects to balloon in costs, which caused some developers to pull
out and others to renegotiate terms originally agreed upon before inflation hit
hard. The lack of a domestic supply chain for offshore wind components and
ships to deliver them also led to higher costs for these initial projects.
Thus, from a financial perspective, the costs for what is essentially a new
industry in the U.S. are very high, as would be expected.
In February 2025, New Jersey
Democrat governor Phil Murphy stopped approving offshore wind projects, citing
high costs and political resistance. Dominion’s wind project offshore Virginia,
which has bipartisan support and was expected to be completed in 2026, is also
in limbo. Also in February, a group of conservative lobbyists including the
Heartland Institute and the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT)
lobbied Interior Secretary Doug Burgum to have NOAA revoke the permits for 11
offshore wind projects, citing dangers to whales and mammal protection laws
including the Endangered Species Act, an odd turn perhaps for conservative
orgs.
Trump’s executive order calls
for the temporary withdrawal of new areas for offshore wind leasing and a halt
on new project approvals pending a review of leasing and permitting practices.
Anti-wind activists cited “unprecedented spikes in whale deaths” that
coincide with vessel surveys for the Atlantic Shores project. According to
CFACT president Craig Rucker:
“There’s no way an environmental group should be in
favor of offshore wind,” Rucker said. “They are always opposed to offshore oil
drilling which involves only speculative harm. But here we actually see dead
whales washing up on beaches in Virginia and other places along the East Coast
and this is happening in increased numbers. But all we hear from the
environmental groups is crickets.”
In particular, the endangered North Atlantic right whale
population is at risk, where only 350 remain and only 70 are females capable of
continuing the species. Since whales migrate up and down the Atlantic Coast,
the whole Atlantic offshore wind area is an area of concern.
In mid-March, the EPA revoked
the Clean Air Act permit for the 1.5 GW Atlantic Shores wind project, citing
Trump’s January 20 executive order, which mandated a pause on offshore wind
leasing and a review of existing leases. The project developers put out a press
release that states:
“Atlantic Shores stands ready to deliver on the promise
of American energy dominance and has devoted extensive time and resources to
follow a complex, multi-year permitting process, resulting in final project
approvals that conform with the law.”
Shell and EDF, both part of the Atlantic Shores project,
had already booked impairments of about $1 billion each on the project due to
cost overruns associated with inflation and the higher cost of borrowing.
Trump has long opposed wind
energy, particularly offshore wind. He noted that it is “an economic and
environmental disaster,” and remarked that it “looks horrible in the
oceans.” He is correct that there are serious issues with offshore wind,
including environmental and species impacts, high costs, intermittency, a
possible threat to military operations and commercial navigation, and the issue
with wind components making us more dependent on China. Trump administration
people have argued that the Biden administration basically ignored evidence
that the endangered North Atlantic Right whale was being severely impacted by
offshore wind development, in pursuit of climate goals.
The vast majority of Atlantic
offshore wind leases are in federal waters. The pause of offshore wind
development, enacted through the January 20 executive order, will last six
months, so until July 20. Rising materials costs due to tariffs are expected to
prevent any new projects from going forward. Projects well underway may be
protected from tariffs by long-term contracts.
Equinor ceased construction
on April 17 of their Empire Wind project offshore New York, after the Trump
administration ordered it to be halted pending further review. They expect to
file a lawsuit since the project is well into the construction phase.
“Empire is engaging with relevant authorities to clarify
this matter and is considering its legal remedies, including appealing the
order,” Equinor said in a statement, adding the project “has validly secured
all necessary federal and state permits and is currently under construction.”
The project, which finalized leasing in March 2017, was
expected to be completed in 2027 and to provide power to New York City.
Equinor’s CFO said at the end of April that the stoppage was unlawful:
“Our position is clear. The stop work order is
unlawful,” he said. Equinor had received all necessary permits by last year,
and had already done construction work on a port and laid rock on the seabed at
the site of turbines. It says the project is more than 30% complete.
“Equinor has invested in good faith, and this is now a
question about the sanctity of contracts,” Reitan said. The company is
considering legal options.
Equinor has already invested $2.5 billion in the project.
Trump’s NOAA complained that
the project was improperly approved:
“Critical areas that support commercial and recreational
fisheries were not excluded from leasing, and proposals that emphasized maximum
development scenarios further restricted opportunities to reduce impacts on
fisheries and important habitats."
Thus, it appears that the Trump administration is acting
just like environmentalists act against fossil fuel projects, going for maximum
delay to cause problems for developers.
Stop work orders were also
issued for ongoing wind projects offshore Maine, partially funded through a
$12.6 million grant awarded by the DOE’s Advanced Research Projects
Agency–Energy (ARPA-E). The three projects suspended include one that is more
of a research project into floating wind turbines in deeper waters. Costs for
such projects are higher, but wind speeds are higher further offshore. The
stoppage announced in April is expected to last 90 days.
German renewables developer
RWE halted its U.S. offshore wind projects, citing political headwinds in
April. Their CEO noted that future projects will only be pursued if certain
conditions are met:
“All necessary federal permits must be in place. Tax
credits must be safe harbored and all relevant tariff risks mitigated. In
addition, onshore wind and solar projects must have secured offtake at the time
of the investment decision. Only if these conditions are met will further
investments be possible, given the political environment.”
Companies, many from Europe,
where offshore wind is a much more mature industry, have already sunk tens of
billions into U.S. offshore wind leases and project development, and are being
impacted by these political decisions.
On May 5, eighteen Democratic
attorneys general filed a lawsuit challenging Trump’s executive order
restricting wind projects. New York Attorney General Letitia James noted:
“This arbitrary and unnecessary directive threatens the
loss of thousands of good-paying jobs and billions in investments, and it is
delaying our transition away from the fossil fuels that harm our health and our
planet.”
A letter to the Bureau of
Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) from the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay
Head (Aquinnah) last year claimed wind farm development had led to “potential
negative and adverse impact[s]” on the environment, marine life, and human
health.
In April, the Government
Accountability Office released a report echoing those concerns, noting wind
projects had also affected the military’s defense and radar systems, and
criticizing the BSEE for how it addressed problems.
Biden’s LNG pause was based
on activist-biased science regarding upstream methane leakage and was not a
serious issue. The Trump offshore wind pause does seek to address some serious
concerns about the environment, species impacts, impacts on commercial fishing,
and potential impacts to military radar disruption. However, many of those
potential impacts were presumably addressed through the original permitting
process. There are important economic concerns as well. In Trump’s case, the
pause seems to be more about revenge against wind development and his personal
dislike for it. My guess is that some projects will go forward and others will
not, so my expectation is for 10GW or less of offshore wind to be built by
2030, about a third of Biden’s original goal.
Just like the Trump delay is similar to environmentalist delays, the big impairment charges are somewhat analogous to the impairments taken by pipeline developers after environmentalist lawsuits made costs balloon, albeit in this case, the cost increases are due to market forces (inflation and high interest rates). A more straightforward analogy is the way both the wind stoppage and pipelines that have been abandoned due to opposition damage the economy by sunken costs that may not be recoverable. Both can become stranded assets. This can happen with renewables when subsidies are not adequate to allow developers to make enough profit to survive.
References:
Inside
Trump’s Plan To End Offshore Wind Projects. Grace Hall. Miami Herald. February
16, 2025. Inside Trump’s Plan To End Offshore
Wind Projects
EPA
yanks air quality permit for 1.5-GW Atlantic Shores offshore wind project.
Diane DiGangi. Utility Dive. March 18, 2025. EPA yanks air quality permit for
1.5-GW Atlantic Shores offshore wind project | Utility Dive
Offshore
Wind On Its Last Legs: Save the Whales Campaigns, Team Trump Boost Anti-Wind
Legal Action. Marc Morano. February 22, 2025. Climate Depot, A CFACT Project. Offshore Wind On Its Last Legs: Save
the Whales Campaigns, Team Trump Boost Anti-Wind Legal Action – Climate Depot
Anti-Wind
Activists Have a Big Ask for the Big Man. Jael Holzman. February 13, 2025. Heat
Map. Anti-Wind Activists Have a Big Ask
for the Big Man - Heatmap News
It's
Time for Burgum to Stop Defying President Trump’s Demand. H. Sterling Burnett.
Western Journal. April 13, 2025. It's Time for Burgum to Stop Defying
President Trump’s Demand
Trump’s
offshore wind policies limit industry’s near-term growth: Morningstar DBRS vice
president. Diana DiGangi. Utility Dive. April 10, 2025. Trump’s offshore wind policies limit
industry’s near-term growth: Morningstar DBRS vice president | Utility Dive
As
Trump escalates his war against wind energy, a giant 54-turbine project off the
coast of New York ceases construction. Jordan Blum. Fortune. April 17, 2025. As Trump escalates his war against
wind energy, a giant 54-turbine project off the coast of New York ceases
construction
Trump
administration orders construction halted on major NY offshore wind project. AP.
Syracuse.com. April 16, 2025. Trump administration orders
construction halted on major NY offshore wind project - syracuse.com
Energy
Department targets Maine’s offshore wind as governor fights Trump on
transgender athletes. Elaine Mallon, Washington Examiner. April 22, 2025. Energy Department targets Maine’s
offshore wind as governor fights Trump on transgender athletes
RWE
CEO says US offshore wind ‘stopped’, spells out new terms for new renewable
investments. Recharge. April 25, 2025. RWE
CEO says US offshore wind 'stopped', spells out terms for new renewable
investments | Recharge
Global
energy giant RWE halts US offshore wind because of Trump. Michelle Lewis.
Electrek. April 25, 2025. Global
energy giant RWE halts US offshore wind because of Trump | Electrek
Trump
Administration Halt to Offshore Wind Project Was ‘Unlawful’, Company Says. Avi
Salzman. Barron’s. April 30, 2025. Trump
Administration Halt to Offshore Wind Project Was ‘Unlawful’, Company Says
Permit
Collapse: Wind Farm Suffers Blow Under Trump. Grace Hall. Miami Herald. April
30, 2025. Permit
Collapse: Wind Farm Suffers Blow Under Trump
Democratic
states sue White House over halting wind energy projects: ‘Reckless’. Emily
Hallas, Washington Examiner. May 6, 2025. Democratic states sue White
House over halting wind energy projects: ‘Reckless’
No comments:
Post a Comment