Friday, July 3, 2026

Horizontal Utica Shale Well in Indiana County, Pennsylvania to Be Converted to EGS Geothermal Pilot Project

     Western Pennsylvania has a high pressure gradient, but I don't know how much that will matter in a cased-hole Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) project. The area, I believe, has a slightly higher geothermal or temperature gradient, which makes it a little bit desirable for any geothermal project. However, EGS projects can extract heat from low geothermal gradients, and it would be good to understand the heat recovery potential of a cased horizontal well in this area. Thus, the announced project will utilize an existing horizontal well in the Utica Shale. As noted below, the pilot project plans to extract both heat and electricity from the well and utilize existing infrastructure.

The EGS pilot demonstration project will generate both electrical power and thermal energy for rural communities in Indiana County, in areas adjacent to legacy and active oil and gas development. The project will extract heat from subsurface geologic formations and transfer it to the surface using gas and fluid circulation in an EGS. This thermal energy will be used to generate electricity for the local power grid and provide direct-use heat for nearby homes and businesses.”

DEP will serve as the project lead, in coordination with the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Bureau of Geological Survey. The project is supported by a world-class team of partners, including Gradient Geothermal Inc., Teverra, Inc., Lehigh University, Idaho National Laboratory, CNX Green Ventures, and Seequent.”

CNX spokesman Brian Aiello said in an email that the first phase of the project would be “a thorough assessment and modeling of CNX’s Marchand Utica well in Indiana County.”

That well, in North Mahoning Township, was first drilled in 2013, according to state drilling records.”

     The announcement included federal government funding of $14 million provided by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Act, enacted under the Biden administration.

     According to the Journal of Petroleum Technology:

Building directly on horizontal drilling and completion practices developed in the Utica, the project will include evaluation of optimal well orientation, lateral placement, and spacing.”

As the first enhanced geothermal systems demonstration site located in the eastern United States, this project offers an important opportunity to assess the ability of such systems to deliver reliable, affordable geothermal electricity to Americans nationwide,” Kyle Haustveit, assistant secretary of the HGEO, said in a DOE press release announcing the project.”

     I must admit that I am skeptical the project will be an economic success or even lead to one, but hopefully I am wrong about that. Unless there is something I don’t know about the geothermal gradient in the area, it just does not seem hot enough, at least compared to much hotter areas in the U.S. west and southwest.

     It is early days for the project. The well to be utilized is not yet decided on, and it is unclear whether another well or wells will be drilled for injection and whether there will be additional hydraulic fracturing to further create the reservoir. 

     I circled Indiana County on the geothermal gradient map below.




 

 

  


References:

 

Utica Shale Targeted for $14 Million Enhanced Geothermal Systems Demonstration. Journal of Petroleum Technology. April 27, 2026. Utica Shale Targeted for $14 Million Enhanced Geothermal Systems Demonstration

Federal money will pay for 'enhanced' geothermal project in Pennsylvania. Reid Frazier. Allegheny Front. May 6, 2026. WESA 90.5 News. Pa. gas well to become “enhanced” geothermal energy project | 90.5 WESA

Shapiro Administration Secures $14 Million for Enhanced Geothermal Systems Pilot Demonstration Project in Pennsylvania. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. April 16, 2026. Shapiro Administration Secures $14 Million for Enhanced Geothermal Systems Pilot Demonstration Project in Pennsylvania | Department of Environmental Protection | Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

China’s Ethnic Unity Law Has Some Positive Features But is Also Blatantly Racist and Is Another Unacceptable Product of Communist Authoritarianism


      In so-called Western countries, we typically reserve the right to oppose and criticize the views and actions of our governments. This gives us traditions of political debate. China does not allow such rigorous debate and dissent. The PRC and the Chinese Communist Party have a poor human rights record. The country always leads in the number of executions, and many are politically motivated. It also has a poor record on political imprisonments and the treatment of ethnic minorities. I have met a few Tibetans who spent many years in prison labor camps without adequate food. More recently, the Uyghur re-education camps have been a matter of global concern. Forced labor is a feature of the camps and has a long history in China. I was pleased when a bipartisan majority in the U.S. Congress voted to respond to the presence of the camps by not purchasing products made in them, although that does not really do that much to deter them. I have never been to China, but my son spent three months there as a student, mostly in Beijing.  

     The law includes requirements to be patriotic in accordance with Han-dominated customs and the Chinese Communist Party, as the explanation of Chapter II, from Wikipedia, points out.

Chapter II, titled Building a Shared Spiritual Home. lays out the ideological characteristics of the law, requiring fostering identification with "the great motherland, the Chinese nation, Chinese culture, the Communist Party of China, and socialism with Chinese characteristics" through patriotic education, education in official historical narratives, publicity of "the fine Zhonghua traditional culture," and promotion of "Chinese cultural symbols and image of the Chinese nation". It also codifies the predominance of Standard Chinese (Putonghua) in public life, codifying the goal of having preschoolers become proficient in Putonghua and requires that Chinese characters be displayed more prominently than minority scripts if both must be used in public. It tasks the Ministry of Education and the National Ethnic Affairs Commission in developing textbooks regarding "the community of the Chinese nation" and requires all schools to integrate that concept into their curricula. It vows to support the standardization, digitization, and preservation of minority texts. It broadly requires media, internet service providers, families, among others, to promote the CCP's ethnic policy. Parents are required to guide their children to "love the Chinese Communist Party and the Chinese people."

     One may ask why China is promoting a new law to weaken ethnic minorities and their cultures. The stated reason is to discourage separatism and promote a unified culture with shared patriotic beliefs. In such proclamations there is little room for dissent. The law provides a context for punishing and arresting more people for disagreeing with the government, including Chinese people who do not live in China. We have all heard about the well-funded and well-established “Chinese police stations” that have existed in several countries, including the U.S. That is the CCP in action.

     The law does promote some things that people can agree on, such as an acceptance of marriages between Han Chinese and ethnic minorities. The question is whether they are promoting such marriages as a way to assimilate ethnic minorities into Han Chinese culture.

     Another thing that is agreeable is the call to stop "information containing ethnic hatred, ethnic discrimination, or other content that undermines ethnic unity and progress.” Of course, that is all well and good, but ethnic assimilation can be considered to be a form of ethnic discrimination, though it is less direct and more subtle. Continuing the Wikipedia summary:

Chapter III, titled Facilitating Interactions, Interchanges, and Intermingling, promotes further ethnic integration. It obligates the government to support "inter-embedded community environments" so that ethnic groups can "live, study, build, share, work, and enjoy together". For that goal, it requires local governments to "forge a strong sense of community for the Chinese nation" and promote integration in all aspects of urban planning and governance. It specifically directs them to implement policies to facilitate cross-regional population movement, employment, student enrollment, and teacher and youth exchanges. It also mandates authorities to support and shape volunteer services, cultural institutions (libraries, museums, etc.), the tourism industry, and modern technologies and online media. It mandates internet service providers to promptly stop the transmission of "information containing ethnic hatred, ethnic discrimination, or other content that undermines ethnic unity and progress.”

     Wikipedia also gives some responses and criticisms of the law, none of which are positive:

Commentary outside of China has centered on the law's promotion of a singular Han-centric Chinese identity at the expense of minorities' identities. Anthropologist Magnus Fiskesjö of Cornell University stated that the "law is consistent with a dramatic recent policy shift, to suppress the ethnic diversity formally recognised since 1949." According to Neil Thomas of Asia Society, the law expands "the legal basis for restricting religious, cultural and political activities among minority groups." According to historian Benno Weiner of Carnegie Mellon University, the law if enforced would mean that non-Han people could not express "any type of discontent without being accused of being essentially separatists or terrorists". James Leibold of La Trobe University stated that "[b]y folding ethnic affairs into national security, the law expands the scope for surveillance and intervention in domains previously treated as social or cultural.”

Some have raised concerns that the law provides a basis to target supporters of Taiwanese independence regardless of jurisdiction. Others have stated that the law raises additional risks for foreign companies investing in China if they investigate forced labor or review supply chains. The legislation has been criticized for not specifying what activities would constitute violations.”

     We should remember that in China, there is one government, no elections, and no room for dissent. Thus, it is by definition a totalitarian form of government. In its case, it is a communist totalitarian government, with an accompanying dismal human rights record and lack of personal freedoms for its citizens. It is the cold-bloodedness of collectivism, in contrast to Zohran Mamdani’s declaration of the “warmth of collectivism.”

     Chapter IV notes that the law”

“…requires promoting "civic and moral development", mandating "transforming outdated customs and traditions" and "promoting a new culture of civility and progress".”

     This simply means re-education, or more accurately, brainwashing through CCP propaganda. Chapters V and VI below set things up so that minders can aid the law through surveillance and reporting conduct that does not follow the law. The wording seems vague enough that the law will mainly serve to give legal context for such enforcement actions that may otherwise be controversial.    

Chapter V and VI concern the enforcement mechanisms of the law. It permits citizens to report conduct that "undermines ethnic unity and progress" and to lodge complaints against government agencies and employees who fail to discharge their obligations under the Law. Procuratorates may initiate public interest litigation when any such conduct also "undermines national interests or the public interest". It generally leaves penalties to be imposed under other applicable laws. It also asserts jurisdiction over foreign organizations and individuals that "commit acts targeting the PRC that undermine ethnic unity and progress or create ethnic division". The law empowers the state to pursue those outside of China perceived as undermining notions of ethnic unity.”

     Tibetan and Uyghur representatives have slammed the law as ethnic erasure and a legal context for long-existing policies of ethnic assimilation into the Han-majority culture. They, along with many human rights experts at the UN, some EU politicians, and some mostly on the right U.S. politicians, have called for the law to be repealed or amended. One Tibetan representative suggested the policy could support “cultural genocide.”

     Mandarin language assimilation is one feature of the law. According to the Hong Kong Free Press:

China officially recognises 55 official ethnic minorities within its borders that speak hundreds of languages and dialects.”

Government policies have already directed that Mandarin Chinese be used as the language of instruction in some areas with large minority populations, such as Tibet and Inner Mongolia.”

Yalkun Uluyol, a China researcher at Human Rights Watch, described the new legislation as a “significant departure” from a Deng Xiaoping-era policy that guaranteed the right of minorities to use their own languages.”

     Those who speak and write Tibetan, Mongolian, and Uyghur are very concerned about the Mandarin language provision.

     Bhuchung Tsering, head of the research and monitoring unit at the International Campaign for Tibet, said that the law seeks to detach the young to sever ties to their culture, citing two clauses:

“…one ordering parents to “teach their children about this new identity”, and the other urging citizens to report on non-compliance with the law.”

If you read these two together, it’s virtually forcing children to report on their parents,” he said.

     According to The Straits Times, Thinlay Chukki, representative of the Dalai Lama and the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA) in central and eastern Europe, noted:

Chukki said the law was legalising a system already in place of forcibly sending Tibetan children to residential boarding schools, where they were “subjected forcibly to the Mandarin language, as well as the Han Chinese culture”.

Activists say a similar boarding school system also exists in the Xinjiang region, where the UN has warned of possible crimes against humanity targeting the mostly Muslim Uighur minority – something China vehemently denies.”

Beijing wants “to disrupt our entire identity, to disconnect generations”, Zumretay Arkin, vice-president of the World Uighur Congress, told AFP.”   

     Hopefully, the law won’t hurt these ethnic people and won’t result in cases where people are punished for pride in their ethnicities and for wanting to continue learning within their own traditions. It makes me think it’s an apt situation for the Pink Floyd song, Another Brick in the Wall:

We don’t need no education. We don’t need no thought control

     A summary of criticism and human rights concerns from Microsoft CoPilot is below:




 


References:

 

German Parliamentary State Secretary Michael Brand Urges Repeal of China’s “Ethnic Unity Law,” Warns of Threat to Tibetan Ancient Cultures. Central Tibetan Administration. July 2, 2026. German Parliamentary State Secretary Michael Brand Urges Repeal of China’s “Ethnic Unity Law,” Warns of Threat to Tibetan Ancient Cultures – Central Tibetan Administration

China’s new ethnic unity law legalising cultural ‘erasure’, minorities warn at UN. The Straits Times. June 29, 2026. China’s new ethnic unity law legalising cultural ‘erasure’, minorities warn at UN | The Straits Times

China’s new ethnic unity law legalising cultural ‘erasure,’ Tibetan and Uyghur minorities warn at UN. Hing Kong Free Press. July 1, 2026. China's new ethnic unity law legalising cultural 'erasure,' minorities warn at UN

China approves ‘ethnic unity’ law denounced by rights groups. Hong Kong Free Press. March 12, 2026. China approves 'ethnic unity' law denounced by rights groups

China defends new ethnic unity law, set to take effect July 1, as in line with 'international practices': New law targets organizations, individuals outside China engaging in acts that 'undermine ethnic solidarity and progress, or incite ethnic separatism': Saadet Gokce. AA. 24 June 2026. China defends new ethnic unity law, set to take effect July 1, as in line with 'international practices'

Law on Promoting Ethnic Unity and Progress. Wikipedia. Law on Promoting Ethnic Unity and Progress - Wikipedia

China tells its ethnic minorities to integrate or face consequences with sweeping new unity law. Simone McCarthy. July 1, 2026. Ethnic Unity Law: China tells minorities to assimilate with sweeping new legislation | CNN

NPC 2026: China Enshrines Xi-Era Ethnic Policy in New Law. NPC Observer. March 12, 2026. NPC 2026: China Enshrines Xi-Era Ethnic Policy in New Law

 

Thursday, July 2, 2026

Are the Democratic Socialists of America Growing in Influence? The Answer Would Seem to Be Yes, with 250 Members Holding Elected Office, Most Since 2019, and a 16-Fold Increase in Membership Over the Past Decade: Emzari Gelashvili’s Unique Perspective


       I have been seeing a lot of articles about the rise of the DSA and the fact that they are winning elections in favorable districts. The right-leaning articles point them out as a clear danger, but the left has had a variable approach. A few of the more sensible on the left, like Senator John Fetterman and long-time Democratic Party operative James Carville, have condemned the socialists, saying they don’t belong in the party. Others, including Senator Chris Murphy, former NYC mayor Bill De Blasio, and even Senator Cory Booker, have tolerated them as collateral damage or said they can even welcome them into the “big tent” as a change to the status quo, as De Blasio noted. I don’t want to believe their influence is growing, but, unfortunately, the data show that it is.

     Washington Examiner writer Emzari Gelashvili grew up in the Soviet Republic of Georgia and knows firsthand the problems with socialism, Marxism, and communism, which are all, if not synonymous, certainly closely related. He was also a Georgian politician. He presents an interesting case that the DSA influence is growing and will likely continue to grow if it is not actively opposed within the Democratic Party. However, he also notes, and I agree, that their growing influence does not reflect the Democratic Party or the American people as a whole. They have outside influence due to their organization and playing the primaries in favorable districts that tend to be low turnout.

Here is the part the radicals would rather you ignore. Pew Research Center's June political typology shows their core faction, the leftward progressives, makes up only about 7% of U.S. adults. They win because they are loud and disciplined, while the sensible majority is passive. The largest Democratic-leaning group, the order and opportunity Left at 18%, is economically liberal but wants secure borders and rejects abolishing the police or the Constitution. The center does not want what the DSA is selling. But the leftward progressives are also the youngest group in the typology — and as centrist Democrats age out, this faction becomes the party's center of gravity. Give it a decade, and the platform stops being radical and starts being mainstream.”

     I still think smarter and more sensible people will prevail, and the influence of the DSA will wane. I don’t think people will want what they are proposing. There does need to be better messaging and more pushback against these extremist ideas, like abolishing necessary societal institutions and governing bodies. The goal of these folks is to tear down existing governmental and economic institutions, then allow the new government to own private entities by “seizing the means of production.” All previous attempts at this immensely authoritarian idea have failed miserably. People just aren’t gonna go for that on any large scale.

     Gelashvili links to an article he wrote last week, urging people to look at the DSA platform as he has done. He points out that their goals go far beyond the social democracy of countries like Denmark, which has abundant social welfare but also a higher economic freedom, which is a proxy for a higher degree of free market capitalism. The country also pays for its social welfare programs with a high middle-class tax rate and a 25% sales tax. He points out that the DSA may use Scandinavian social democracy as an example, but their platform goes much further:

The DSA has considered the Denmark argument and rejected it. In their own words, on their own website, they say their vision “pushes further than historic social democracy.” They do not want a softer safety net under capitalism. They want, in their phrasing, to “collectively own the key economic drivers” of American life. One of the organization’s founders put it without decoration: The end goal is social control of the means of production. They do not want to improve capitalism — they want to get rid of it. The group’s 2025 platform calls for abolishing the Senate, dismantling the police, and building “a new society from the ground up.”

     He also notes that Denmark does not have government-owned grocery stores.

     Below, he refers to what happened to his family. They were deported to Kazakhstan and lived in harsh poverty after they got on a Soviet deportation list in the 1950s. In the second paragraph below, he talks about how the Soviet society was authoritarian and manipulative. The third paragraph below beseeches us to heed the warnings. I believe his words should be well-considered.

Socialism does not begin with deportation lists. It begins with a state that decides who may sell what, at what price, and to whom, and with politics that sort citizens into oppressors and oppressed. The lists come later, and always for the same kind of person: the capable, the independent, the one who refuses to be made smaller. The welfare state redistributes money. Socialism, the article the DSA names in its own documents, redistributes power. Only one of those promises has ever needed barbed wire to keep it.”

I know the difference because I did not read about it in a seminar. In 1996, while serving in Georgia’s security services, I reviewed original Soviet-era intelligence archives in Tbilisi. What struck me was not the espionage. It was how much of the effort went to what the KGB called active measures — the long-term shaping of education, culture, and institutions, designed not to steal secrets but to change how a future generation understood its own society, until it came to see its own civilization as the thing most in need of tearing down. The Soviet Union disappeared in 1991. The assumptions it worked to plant in Western minds did not disappear with it. A young American raising a red flag over an American city is no one’s agent. He is something the planners wanted more than any agent: a free citizen, certain he is liberating his country, doing the work they once had to pay for.”

That is why the Denmark answer cannot be left standing. The New Yorkers who chanted three letters last week believe they chose a kinder society. Their own movement’s documents tell a different story. I gave my warning before the vote, and the vote came anyway. That is democracy, and I do not begrudge it. But a warning ignored is not a warning disproven. The least a free people can do, before the next election and before the next flag is raised, is read what the flag-wavers have already written in their own platform.” 





 


References:

 

Soviet flag flies in New York: A survivor’s warning about socialist takeover. Emzari Gelashvili, Washington Examiner. July 2, 2026. Soviet flag flies in New York: A survivor’s warning about socialist takeover

The socialists won New York. Have you seen their platform?  Emzari Gelashvili. Wahington Examiner. June 26, 2026. The socialists won New York. Have you seen their platform?

 

CoolCove Plug-In Air Conditioner Delivers Cheap and Effective AC as Advertised, According to One Independent Tester and Online Product Reviews: It Is Also a Ceramic Heater: However, There are Also Complaints That It Does Not Cool Effectively and Offers No More Cooling Than a High-End Fan Does


     While I am happy with my whole-house mini-split heat pump AC system, this new product seems to be an authentic breakthrough in affordable, effective, and simple-to-install air conditioning, although single units are only good for smaller spaces. Additional units can be combined for larger spaces. The product has no compressor, no refrigerant, is light, and can be installed simply by mounting it on a wall with the included mounting brackets and plugging it in. The claims are given below.



     The testers were concerned that the product is only available from the manufacturer, rather than from Amazon or eBay, but apparently, this is due to the proliferation of cheaper “knock-offs” with similar-sounding names like Cool Cave, which are likely inferior reverse-engineered copies.



     The product was tested in an attic apartment and in an attic home office, and it cooled down the space quickly. They also noted that the noise level is low, below 40 dB. Power consumption was recorded in the attic home office test.

Power consumption over the 8 hours of operation, measured with a standard outlet energy meter: 0.38 kWh. At current electricity rates, that comes out to about 17¢ for a full workday. A comparable split-system AC running the same load would have used roughly ten times as much.”

     They also tested the product in a senior apartment, a kid’s bedroom, and in an RV, with similarly effective results.



     The unit is cheap, around a hundred bucks or less, and there is a 30-day money-back guarantee.

     How does it work?

The answer comes down to the airflow geometry inside the unit. Unlike a traditional AC, which runs a compressor with chemical refrigerant looping between an indoor and outdoor unit, the CoolCove uses three sequential cooling chambers in which warm room air is progressively cooled.”




     I saw a video ad that noted that the inventor’s mother had suffered and maybe died from heat due to loss of AC that was the result of a massive electricity bill that she couldn’t pay. As a result, and since he was a cooling engineer, he was motivated to invent an effective AC system. That could, however, be an exaggerated marketing ploy.








     Perhaps it’s all a scam, and even the testing and the average 4.8 out of 5, 1400-plus positive reviews are part of the scam. I would not doubt that such elaborate scams occur. However, when I asked if it was a scam in a search engine, it came up with a Consumer’s Choice article that listed it as the number one portable air conditioner of the year with a 9.9 out of 10 rating. They did note, however, that it often runs out of stock. Of course, that is probably a good thing for something that likely works.

     However, I did come across a couple of articles that described it as basically an elaborate fan that could not replace a standard AC unit, even in a small space. One Snoops reviewer said that higher-priced fans could cool a room better. She also notes that the marketing ploys used suggest that the company is a bit shady.

     Thus, I would say the jury is still out on the product. I saw it as low as $89, with knock-offs as low as $25. A box fan costs about $20-25, and a better fan can cost about $69. Thus, the risk of simply getting an expensive but effective fan instead of an effective AC unit won’t break the bank. Since it is similar in cost to a high-end fan, the risk of feeling ripped off isn’t that great either, especially since it functions as a ceramic space heater as well. In any case, I don’t need one, but I would like to see for myself whether it works as advertised.  

     I did find a recent detailed review that considered all the pros and cons of the unit. The reviewer here said that as long as one understands that it is basically a unit for a single small room, one will be happy with the result. There are six modes. Wall mounting saves space. It also has a remote control.

A few things point to legitimacy. It’s a coherent, real category of product, a compact plug-in AC and heater, not some impossible gadget that defies physics.”

     This reviewer also suggested that it beats out a fan. They also did not like some of the marketing. Below, they note some of the product's features. 400-800 watts is low for a heating or cooling device. I am guessing the cooling stays in the low range. A typical 20-inch box fan pulls about 50 watts on a low setting and about 75 watts on the high setting. Higher-end tower fans may pull 100 watts. Thus, at 400 watts (my assumption), the device should cool better than a tower fan.



Against a plain fan, CoolCove is the clear upgrade once a room is already hot, because a fan just shoves warm air around, while this actually pushes out cooler air and can heat up too.”


     Another realistic reviewer noted that evaporator-cooling is a real thing:

"In cooling mode, the unit pulls warm room air in through its vents and moves it through what the company calls its internal evaporator cooling chamber, where the heat is drawn out of the air before the cooler air is pushed back into the room. The brand markets this as its RapidCool Airflow System, which is simply its name for the process rather than a new law of physics. The important takeaway is that evaporator-based cooling is a real, established way to lower the temperature of air, and because the moisture is managed inside the cabinet, there's no hose and no tank, which is what keeps the whole thing genuinely portable and wall-mountable."

     Thus, I would say that for $89, the value is likely pretty good or at least comparable to buying a high-end fan and a space heater. In this case, one can get both in one unit.

 


References:

 

Independent Hands-On Test: We Tested the CoolCove at 88 °F in a Cincinnati Attic Apartment: Attic apartment in Cincinnati-West End, around 690 sq ft, outside temperatures up to 93 °F — how the CoolCove performed in the bedroom and the converted attic home office. James Whitfield | Home & Climate | May 25, 2026. Independent Hands-On Test: We Tested the CoolCove at 88 °F in a Cincinnati Attic Apartment

Top 5 Portable Air Conditioners of 2026. Consumer’s Choice. Top 5 Portable Air Conditioners of 2026

Cool Cove AC Review: Scam or Legit? What Buyers Should Know Before Ordering. Juliet. Ibisik. June 28, 2026. Cool Cove AC Review: Scam or Legit? What Buyers Should Know Before Ordering - Ibisik

Is Cool Cove AC a Scam? here’s my BRUTALLY honest reviews. Lilian Davidson, Snoop Reviews. June 28, 2026. Is Cool Cove AC a Scam? here's my BRUTALLY honest reviews - Snoopviews

Cool Cove Reviews: My Honest Take On The No-Install CoolCove AC And Heater. Portable Air Conditioners. July 1, 2026. Cool Cove Reviews: My Honest Take On The No-Install CoolCove AC And Heater | Cooler Find

Cool Cove Reviews: Must Read Before Buying the CoolCove AC! Carl Williams. Tech Times. July,1 2026. Cool Cove Reviews: Must Read Before Buying the CoolCove AC!

Europe Needs Air Conditioning Amid Intense Heat Wave: AC is a Form of Climate Adaptation, It Saves Lives, and Avoiding It is Irrational


 

     Europe just experienced an intense heat wave. Here in the U.S. Midwest, we are undergoing a heat dome as well, with temps as high as 100 deg F predicted. There will be a difference in impacts. More people will be miserable, suffer, and die in Europe than in the U.S. simply because U.S. residents have much better access to air conditioning than those in the E.U.

     In European countries, AC use is only around 20% of the population, compared to countries such as the U.S. and Japan, where it is about 76% and 90%, respectively. The difference is simply that lives are saved during heat waves, where there is more AC.

     It was hot enough in the U.K. that people lined up at markets to purchase AC units and fans.




     There is no doubt that Europe is warming, as Roger Pielke Jr. confirms. Heat mortality is also rising in Europe, with over 1000 deaths attributed to the recent heat wave. He writes:

Heat mortality has also been increasing in Europe: Summer 2022 saw an estimated ~68,000 heat-related deaths, 2023, ~50,800; 2024, ~62,800. The WHO European Region reports that heat mortality is up by about 30 percent over two decades.”




     In contrast, heat mortality has fallen in every region in the U.S. over the past 50 years due mainly to the widespread adoption of air conditioning. The graph below shows very clearly that air conditioning saves lives. It really is that simple.




     Pielke Jr. shows some evidence that if Europe had increased in AC adoption from 19% to nearly 90% during the 2022 heat wave, then about 35,000 lives would have been saved.



     The graph below shows clearly that heat mortality increases with age. Most deaths from heat occur indoors. The elderly and infants are most protected by air conditioning. He notes that in Europe, 93% of deaths from heat occur in people over 65, and 90.5% of deaths in the 2022 heat wave occurred in people over 80.




     Kevin Kohler’s July 2025 article, ‘Make Europe Cool Again’, has more data showing that Europe by far leads the world in deaths from heat per capita. He argued that AC is not a luxury, but a necessity.





     Kohler puts some blame on EU policies that de-emphasize economic growth.

These regulations have not happened by accident, but they come from an ideology that emphasizes energy degrowth as the only viable solution to climate change. What that means in practice is that Europe has heavily prioritized insulation and passive cooling. In contrast, active cooling through an AC, even if running on clean energy, has been disincentivized because it requires energy.”

     As Pielke Jr. shows in the table below, countries in the E.U. clearly have policies that discourage air conditioning, and one could say that these policies increase the risk of death as well. Thus, one could also say that efforts to protect the climate are literally killing people. Can one call them climate policy deaths? He also points out that AC demand increases when solar energy is at peak generation, so that a significant amount of the power for AC can come from solar energy that might otherwise be curtailed, where applicable. The aversion to AC in Europe may well be based on seeing energy usage as a vice to be avoided to protect the climate. There are other reasons as well. Northern Europe did not have a real need for AC until a few decades ago, when summer heat began increasing. Historical temperatures did not demand AC, and so some cultural aversion to it developed.




     Maarten Boudry writes in a recent article for Quillette:

In practice, Europeans of all ages are told to suck it up and sweat it out. France would sooner close its schools in a heat wave than fit them with devices that demonstrably improve concentration and learning. In the Swiss canton of Geneva, installing an air conditioner requires a doctor's certificate. During the recent energy crisis, Spain and Italy barred public buildings from cooling below 27°C— hot enough to dull your cognitive powers by 5 percent.”

     He, too, cites the insane AC disincentives:

The resistance is baked into European regulation. In many countries a conventional air conditioner lowers your building's energy rating. The result is entirely predictable: owners and landlords decline to install units, or rip out the ones they have. Those left without built-in cooling fall back on drafty, inefficient portables that can scarcely make a dent in the temperature. I own one myself—a wheezing box with a fat hose shoved through a rickety fabric covering the window. It is the thermodynamic equivalent of mopping the floor with the tap running, but that’s simply the direction in which Europe’s regulations have nudged me.”

     Boudry, a philosopher, gives more commonsense insights into the matter and argues successfully that it is prosperity that enables adaptation.

The practical fixes for deadly heat are straightforward: do what the Americans are doing. Reform the energy ratings so they stop penalising air conditioners. Streamline the permits for built-in cooling. Retrofit every care home and hospital ward. Open publicly accessible cooling centres. And accelerate the build-out of clean, reliable electricity—because a Frenchman relaxing in a spacious air-conditioned villa, drawing on nuclear power, still emits less carbon than a frugal German drawing from a coal-fired grid. Grid management beats self-flagellation.”

But these are just symptoms. The harder task is the mental switch: to stop treating energy as something to atone for. Energy is the master resource, the thing that buys us nearly every other good. The whole of human history is the story of harnessing ever more energy to improve our lives and to hold the lethal forces of nature at bay. To despise energy is to bite the hand that feeds you.”

Which brings me to one last trivia question: which continent suffers the most cold-related deaths? It’s neither Europe nor North America, but Africa. Prosperity is what allows us to adapt—to heat and cold alike—and adaptation is what stands between us and an inhospitable nature.”

     I remember when I was young in the 1970s, when we got our first air conditioning unit. It was huge and very heavy. It took two or even three people to lift it up to the window and required a wooden substructure under it to hold it in place. Now, AC units are small and not nearly as energy-intensive.

     While Britain is not known for being hot, as noted, summer heat waves have been increasing. Yet, only 5% of British households have AC, according to a 2025 article by the Centre for British Progress. The 2022 heat wave caused about 3000 deaths there. Since then, installation of air-source heat pumps has been rising, but the costs for these units is pretty high, and electricity costs are also high in the U.K., so the costs also disincentivize AC adoption. They do mention one caveat of higher AC adoption in cities. It does increase the urban heat island effect. They site a study in Phoenix that estimates an increase of 1-1.5 deg C nighttime temperature increases during heat waves due to the heat island effect. That is important, but remember, most heat deaths occur indoors.

     The French aversion to AC does have a lot to do with views on climate change.

A recent survey in France found that one in six people said they would rather suffer for the sake of the environment. Vandecasteele told CBS News she doesn't find that surprising.”

"We're not doing this for us," she said. "We're doing this for the future generations."

     What about the thousands of elderly people who just died and the others who will die in future heat waves? Over a decade or so, the number of easily preventable deaths easily exceeds 100,000.

     The current heat wave in the U.S. Midwest has maximum temperatures near 100 deg F, just a few degrees cooler than the maximum temps in the European heat wave. I am experiencing little discomfort and going outside to do yardwork in the evening when it cools down to the upper 80s, with lots of sweating, but no ill effects. I plan to take a bicycle ride in a cool, shady area this evening.

     Europe has favored alternative approaches to AC, such as awnings, better insulation, and passive cooling. While these are all good, they can’t replace AC. In Europe, the right-wing favors AC.  The issue may propel far-right candidate Marine La Pen in France. It is good that some environmentalists in the country are beginning to realize that AC is indeed a necessity. Places like hospitals and nursing homes are especially in need of adequate AC systems since the elderly are most vulnerable. But more is needed at the governmental level in Europe to embrace AC.

"We do not have a defined position on air conditioning, neither for nor against," said Anna-Kaisa Itkonen, European Commission spokesperson for climate.

     I remember a day I was home a few years ago when the power was out for an extended period after a storm, and it hit about 97 degrees F. It was miserable. I went outside to the shade and hung out there for a while. I was not wearing much clothing either.

     While it is likely that anthropogenic climate change has contributed significantly to the rise in European heat waves, the answer to that is clearly not to restrict and make more difficult the use of life-saving AC.  

     In terms of risk, one could say that Europe is risk-averse when it comes to climate change risks, but is willing to endure more direct and immediate risk by avoiding the widespread adoption of AC. Climate change may kill, but one can hardly deny in this case that climate policy also kills. 

    

      

References:

 

Huge queues outside Lidl as Brits strip shelves of air con units on hottest June day ever at 36.7C. Mark Duell, Eleanor Mann, and Jon Brady. Daily Mail. June 25, 2026. Huge queues outside Lidl as Brits strip shelves of air con units on hottest June day ever at 36.7C

Europe's Deadly Aversion to Air Conditioning: Tens of thousands die in European summers for want of a technology the rest of the rich world takes for granted. Roger Pielke Jr. Substack. June 25, 2026. Europe's Deadly Aversion to Air Conditioning

Make Europe Cool Again. Kevin Kohler. Machinocene. July 4, 2025. Make Europe Cool Again - by Kevin Kohler - Machinocene

How Europe Became the World Champion of Heat Deaths: The continent with the lowest number of hot days leads the world in heat mortality. Europe’s self-inflicted aversion to air conditioning betrays a deeper hostility to energy and to progress itself. Maarten Boudry. Quillette. 24 June 2026. Europe Leads World in Heat Deaths Despite Fewer Hot Days

Air conditioning: saving lives and accelerating net-zero: Air conditioning can save lives, boost productivity and help the UK achieve net zero. Currently, government regulation all but bans it. Ed Hezlet and Lauren Gilbert. Centre for British Progress. July 25, 2025. Air conditioning: saving lives and accelerating net-zero

Why some Europeans resist air conditioning amid deadly heat waves. Leigh Kiniry. CBS News. June 30, 2026. Why some Europeans resist air conditioning amid deadly heat waves

The most severe and extensive heatwave in Europe: hundreds dead, dozens drowned, road closures, school and nuclear plant shutdowns. Carlos Fresneda. El Mundo. June 30, 2026. The most severe and extensive heatwave in Europe: hundreds dead, dozens drowned, road closures, school and nuclear plant shutdowns

Europe suffers under rare heat wave. Statista. June 30, 2026. Europe suffers under rare heat wave

Air conditioning is fascist. The Daily Digest. July 1, 2026. Air conditioning is fascist

 

Wednesday, July 1, 2026

DOE Office of Critical Minerals and Energy Innovation Awards $75 Million for Five Projects to Extract Minerals from Coal and Coal-Based Feedstocks: It Follows Earlier Announcement to Spend $134 Million to Shore Up REE Supply Chains


     The U.S. Dept of Energy’s Office of Critical Minerals and Energy Innovation announced awards of $75 million to five energy projects for the extraction of critical minerals from coal and coal-based feedstocks. These include the extraction of rare earth elements (REEs). These awards are part of the funding for the DOE’s Mines & Metals Capacity Expansion – Piloting Byproduct Critical Minerals and Materials Recovery at Domestic Industrial Facilities. The funding will be used to develop pilot projects. The recipients are listed below.




American industrial facilities have the potential to produce valuable critical materials from coal and coal byproducts,” said Assistant Secretary of Energy (EERE) Audrey Robertson. “By investing in these facilities, we can increase domestic critical materials production and help mitigate the financial risk of commercial deployment.”    

     This funding is a part of the nearly $1 billion in funding announced last year to advance and scale mining, processing, and manufacturing technologies across key stages of the critical minerals and materials supply chains. It follows the announcement on June 2 to spend $134 million to bolster rare earth element supply chains. The two projects listed below plan to extract REEs from industrial waste, the first from bauxite ore waste, and the second from “domestic industrial waste-derived feedstocks.”




References:

 

DOE’s Office of Critical Minerals and Energy Innovation Awards $75 Million to Accelerate Critical Minerals and Materials Recovery from Coal and Coal-Based Feedstocks. U.S. Dept. of Energy. July 1, 2026. DOE’s Office of Critical Minerals and Energy Innovation Awards $75 Million to Accelerate Critical Minerals and Materials Recovery from Coal and Coal-Based Feedstocks | Department of Energy

DOE’s Office of Critical Minerals and Energy Innovation Announces $134 Million To Bolster Rare Earth Element Supply Chains. U.S. Dept. of Energy. June 2, 2026. DOE’s Office of Critical Minerals and Energy Innovation Announces $134 Million To Bolster Rare Earth Element Supply Chains | Department of Energy

     Western Pennsylvania has a high pressure gradient, but I don't know how much that will matter in a cased-hole Enhanced Geothermal S...