Blog Archive

Sunday, October 11, 2026

Supreme Court Should Put a Stop to Unfair, Vague, Vindictive, and Stupid Climate Lawsuits


     A Supreme Court case currently being considered involves climate change litigation. I have always been opposed to these efforts, seeing them as vague, unfair, and vindictive. The Supreme Court heard arguments this past Monday in Suncor v. Boulder, a dispute over whether federal law prevents cities and states from suing oil companies under state law for alleged climate damage linked to emissions that cross state borders. For me, the ruling should clearly not allow such cases to go forward. They are vindictive in that they are propagated by anti-fossil fuel activists wishing to harm fossil fuel companies, which will also harm those who use their products, meaning everyone. Anybody want to see higher oil, natural gas, diesel, and gasoline prices? The answer is clearly no, but a ruling in favor of the plaintiff would likely result in just that. 

     According to Fox News:

 "You would see mass exodus and that would create more scarcity with fuel, more so than we're seeing already today, higher prices," Jason Isaac, CEO of American Energy Institute, told Fox News Digital. "And that's really what this is about. It's about controlling these companies and stopping the use of hydrocarbons."

     One of the plaintiffs was asked if similar lawsuits could be filed against others, including large retailers, and he answered that it could happen. Justice Brett Kavanaugh opined that widespread litigation of the sort could bankrupt defendants.

“The city and county of Boulder, Colo., sued oil giants ExxonMobil and Suncor Energy in 2018, accusing the companies of knowingly contributing to climate change while misleading the public about the alleged dangers of fossil fuels. The municipalities are seeking damages to help cover the mounting costs of climate-related harms. There are roughly 30 similar lawsuits pending in jurisdictions across the country, including cases in Portland and Baltimore.”

“Boulder's lawsuit alleged ExxonMobil and Suncor knew for decades about the climate risks associated with fossil fuels but misled the public about those risks. The complaint pointed to a 1977 internal memo from ExxonMobil that circulated among the company's highest-level managers. The memo reported that "current scientific opinion overwhelmingly favors" that fossil fuels contribute to the rise in CO2 emissions.”

     I have always thought that such claims are patently ridiculous since no one really knew the possible implications of climate change until much later, and even now there are significant uncertainties. The other objection I have is simply that we need inexpensive, abundant, and reliable energy, which can best be provided mostly by fossil fuels. Boulder, also known as the People’s Republic of Boulder for its reputation regarding renewable energy and Marxist socialism, is perhaps where such lawsuits are likely to originate. I have always noted that so-called climate change attribution science holds many uncertainties and is basically unreliable, not unlike the energy promoted by its advocates.

“David Bookbinder, who previously served as counsel of record for Boulder but is no longer involved in the case, described the lawsuit as a way to implement an "indirect carbon tax" during a Federalist Society forum last year.”

“But Boulder has maintained that the case is not an attempt to regulate national climate policy, arguing instead that Colorado has the authority to hold companies accountable under state law for alleged harms suffered within its borders.”

"Since the founding, states have had the power to provide tort remedies for injuries occurring within their borders even when the conduct causing those injuries occurred elsewhere," Russell told the justices.

“O.H. Skinner, executive director of the Alliance for Consumers, argued that the lawsuits are an attempt to accomplish through the courts what climate advocates have been unable to achieve through Congress.”

"When you really boil it down, and you separate it from all the legal arguments, the advocates who push these cases are very clear," Skinner told Fox News Digital. "That it's an effort to get a backdoor carbon tax, because carbon taxes have never passed in Congress, or to bankrupt the energy industry."

     A victory for the plaintiff could lead to a flurry of similar cases which would have a chilling effect on some of the country’s most important companies. Even the costs to defend the cases would be astronomical.

"From Boulder's perspective, anybody who's contributed to climate change would be liable, any sort of company, big or small, and the problem here is that to the left, climate change is everything and everything is climate change," Skinner told Fox News Digital. "So it's very hard to find a line for who isn't contributing to climate change."

     Some other states, including Utah, have banned these kinds of state tort law cases.

"If the energy companies were to lose and Colorado were to win, this would in effect drive up the prices of gas all across the country," Utah Attorney General Derek Brown told Fox News Digital. "And so those kind of decisions ultimately, it's the province of Congress."

     For me, this is a huge no-brainer. I would like to see this case decided in favor of the defendants, and I would also like to see it decided with significant support of the liberal justices as well as the conservative ones. Apparently, Samuel Alito recused himself from the case, so there is a chance of a 4-4 tie. However, I am fairly confident that a majority will rule in favor of the defendants, hopefully an 8-0 unanimous decision that will pour cold water on future cases like this, which basically waste the courts’ time and energy. The cases are just plain stupid.

 


References:

 

Supreme Court climate case could bankrupt oil companies, send gas prices soaring, experts warn. Elaine Mallon. Fox News. October 10, 2026. Supreme Court climate case could bankrupt oil companies, send gas prices soaring, experts warn

3D Printed Cement Supercapacitors Could Power Next-Gen 'Smart' Buildings: Cement-Based Energy Storage Remains Challenging, However


     A new study published in ACS Nano involves cement-based supercapacitors for energy storage in smart buildings. Supercapacitors store very small amounts of energy but charge and discharge rapidly and for millions of cycles. Putting them within building materials like cement would avoid the need for bulky batteries.




     According to Tech Xplore:

"If renewable energy is available to recharge [the supercapacitors] frequently enough, they could meet some energy needs through repeated charging and discharging," says Zhong, the corresponding author of the study.

“Zhong and colleagues Wencai Ren and Haiping Wu first mixed carbon nanotubes, carbon black and cement to form a printable electrode ink. Then, using a 3D printer, they deposited the ink onto a small concrete slab in a pattern resembling interlocked fingers.”

“As the cement within the slab was hydrated, its pores filled with water and ions that easily traveled between the electrodes. And as this design shortened the distance charged ions had to travel, the overall supercapacitor was more efficient than previous iterations.”



     The compressive strength of the supercapacitor was found to be similar to that of commercial concrete. Supercapacitors could be used to power small loads like LEDs, self-powered sensors, and emergency lighting.




     Operation was found to be stable down to about 0 degrees Fahrenheit, and the researchers are hoping to engineer one that will be able to handle colder temps.

Zhong explains that "if building materials could not only support structures but also store energy, sense their surroundings and even interact with people, buildings would become more than passive shelters. They could become truly smart environments."

     Challenges to cement-based energy storage include overcoming the poor mechanical properties at the interface between the electrode and the separator and inefficient ion transport. Other challenges include electrolyte freezing and moisture management.

 

   


References:

 

Cement-based supercapacitors could power next-generation 'smart' buildings. American Chemical Society. Tech Xplore. edited by Robert Egan. October 1, 2026. Cement-based supercapacitors could power next-generation 'smart' buildings

Monolithic 3D-Printed Interdigitated Cement-Based Supercapacitors for Structural Energy Storage. Haiping Wu; Jing Zhong; Wencai Ren. ACS Nano (August 17, 2026) 20 (34): 24078–24090. Monolithic 3D-Printed Interdigitated Cement-Based Supercapacitors for Structural Energy Storage | ACS Nano | ACS Publications

Saturday, October 10, 2026

Trump Buying Diesel from Russia to Counter His Own Failings in Iran is Bad but His Insistence that Ukraine Stop Bombing Russia’s Refineries is Worse


     I’m glad I don’t drive a diesel vehicle because I would be directly supporting the Kremlin’s brutal ongoing invasion of Ukraine. I don’t want to support that. Do you? By his actions, Trump is demanding that we do just that. That sucks for Ukraine and for America, that our leader thinks we should suck up to the Hitler of our time to save a few bucks. We already have it much easier than Asia and Europe in terms of the effects of both the Iran War and the loss of Russian refinery capacity. Trump is demanding that Ukraine stop bombing Russian refineries, but I don’t recall him demanding Russia stop bombing buses, apartment buildings, locomotives, power plants, major bridges, and other civilian targets. Instead, he demands Ukraine not bomb diesel refineries, which I believe are clearly a military target. Power plants are not powering the invasion of their country; diesel is, and they have a right to stop it.

     The diesel deal with Russia amounts to about a 9- or 10-day supply of U.S. diesel over a four-month period. That is a lot if it were just added to the U.S. market but not so much if added to the world market as planned. It would probably help ease high prices a little, but the effect would be temporary and probably a pretty small price drop. However, with recent reports that 51% of Russia’s refinery capacity is offline, I am not sure what they can add to the market. I am not sure how much diesel they have in storage. The deal would certainly help Russia and its full-war economy and help fund the bombing of Ukraine, which takes up much of the country’s budget. It is a pointless war of aggression that benefits no one, not even Russia.

     “immediately supply over 300,000 Tons of Diesel Fuel to the American and Global Marketplace.”

“He promised 500,000 more tons in November, 1 million tons after that and 3 million more “within a short period of time,” depending on the condition of Russia’s refineries. Trump said diesel prices would be “COMING DOWN, IN RECORD NUMBERS, AND FAST!”

“Oil analyst Andy Lipow said the first two Russian shipments are “quite small” compared with the entire global diesel market, according to The Hill.”

“Lipow said the 3 million tons would be more significant and could bring “some relief on diesel prices” if Russia comes up with the fuel.”

“The Treasury Department said Friday on X that it was immediately issuing a temporary license to allow the supply of Russian diesel to the global market.”

“The move came a month after Trump signed a sweeping Russia sanctions law aimed at the country’s energy economy, according to the AP.”

“Congress just voted to increase the president’s authority to punish Russia economically. Instead, he throws them a lifeline by allowing these massive diesel buys,” Haake wrote in another post.

“The White House did not immediately respond to AP questions about who is paying for the diesel, when it would become available or whether November’s shipment would arrive before the Nov. 3 midterm elections.”

     Trump’s comments about Zelensky being in need of being replaced by someone willing to make a deal with Russia are quite concerning. The Europeans and Ukraine are not happy about the diesel buy plan. Europe has long been paying much higher diesel prices than we do in the U.S., around $9.11 average in 2026 and about the same last year.

     Trump recently demanded that Zelensky stop bombing Russian refineries, and now he has doubled down on those demands. Meanwhile, Ukraine is still short on missile interceptors. One reason for the shortage is Trump’s miscalculation of Iran’s missile and drone capabilities, which required more interceptors than predicted. As I understand it from the Kremlin’s own statements and from the bulk of news stories, it is Russia that refuses to make a deal. Territorial concessions of any sort are not a deal worth making. Freezing the conflict at the line of contact is the only deal to be made, and Russia does not want to make it despite its abysmal loss of lives. Stories of Russian troops starving, lacking water, lacking supplies, shooting deserters, shooting and torturing captives, and targeting civilians have continued throughout the whole war that is nearing five years. Ukrainians are trapped by mines and starving in Russian-held areas. The Russians are not helping. The Ukrainians are dropping them food via drones. Ukrainian civilians are dying in greater numbers from recent attacks directly on them while they are short on interceptors. There has only been one aggressor and one victim in this war, and making deals with the aggressor is not warranted. Zelensky rightly called it “weak,” which is likely to perturb Trump. Their offensive strikes on Russian refineries are having the intended effect of slowing Russian supply lines and causing economic disruption.

“He better damn well stop," Trump said of Zelensky's authorization of attacks on Russian refineries.

     Congress just passed a needed heavy sanctions package against Russia, and long has had sanctions on its oil sector, which now will be undermined by the waiver. He is insisting that Ukraine enable its invader. That is cold. Ukraine is not the country that needs a new leader. In any case, none of the potential replacements for Zelensky are likely to make a deal with Russia, so Trump is just blustering. Zelensky is still popular in the country.

     Trump would effectively be rewarding Putin twice: once for allowing them to sell diesel at market prices and a second time for impeding Ukraine’s ability to attack its invader.  

  


Addendum: October 11


     Trump just announced that Russia and

Ukraine have agreed to an energy ceasefire.

That is certainly a positive development.

Maybe Ukrainians won't have to freeze so

much this winter. It makes me wonder what 

Russia will bomb instead: more buses, 

locomotives, apartment buildings, restaurants,

shopping malls? 


 

References:

 

Trump says Ukraine needs ‘a new leader who can make a deal’. Washington Examiner. October 10, 2026. Trump says Ukraine needs 'a new leader who can make a deal'

Trump’s big fix for fuel crisis unravels as experts point to basic math: 'Head scratcher'. David Edwards. Raw Story. October 9, 2026. Trump’s big fix for fuel crisis unravels as experts point to basic math: 'Head scratcher'

 

 

Anti-Zionism and Anti-Semitism: Conspiracy Theories, Academic Papers and Bias, Teachers Unions, Publishers, Hollywood, Housing, War Crimes, Genocide, Delusions, Data, the Abrahamic Movement, Early Arab/Zionist Solidarity, and the Origin of Anti-Zionist Propaganda: PART 2


PART 2

     I will begin part 2 of this essay with the shameful words of the Democratic Socialists of America on October 7, 2026:

“October 7th marks three years of the ongoing genocide of the Palestinian people, one of the deadliest ongoing and globally broadcasted massacres in modern history.”

“October 7th marks three years since resistance against imperialism changed the fate of our world forever.”

“Resistance to imperialism?” Try mass murder, rape, and torture of civilians.

     While the post was collaborative with other groups to announce a pro-Palestinian event happening today and the DSA has since removed itself from the announcement, whatever that means, it is way beyond the pale and, frankly, a disgusting display.

     The Palestinian Authority, after October 7, framed the massacre as not just resistance, but heroic resistance. They conducted surveys among the population (presumably in the West Bank) and around 80% agreed. Over the past three years, they have acknowledged that the massacre was problematic for Palestinians, but they blame the Israelis fully (for being brutally invaded). It reminds me of the surveys in Palestine and Gaza after 9/11 where majorities that high were pleased with the bombing, both right after the massacre and years later. In fact, the first news story I saw after 9/11 was a video of Palestinians passing out candy in celebration. My point is that I believe the vast majority of the Palestinian populace sees itself as at war with Israel and America. Israel and America are the enemies. The PA's actions, like “pay-for-slay” and terrorist cells, including Hamas, in the West Bank complicate matters. Some Israeli settlers have been rightly accused of terrorist actions as well, including intimidation tactics. Some are racist. However, the data show that West Bank Palestinians have committed far more terrorist acts and killed and injured more people there over the years. I remember not long after October7, maybe in early 2024, there was a story that noted a restaurant opened up in Jordan called October 7, a disgusting display of support for murder.

     I was also aghast to note that more pro-Palestinian events had been scheduled around the world on this most recent October 7 than events honoring the massacred Jews.

“The far left sees October 7th — the deadliest day for Jews since the Holocaust — not as an occasion to mourn the 1,200 Israelis murdered in an act of terror but as an occasion to romanticize the mass murder of Jews as ‘resistance,'” Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-NY) said on X in response to the Instagram post. “The inevitable consequence of glorifying political violence is political violence itself. That is the dangerous direction in which American politics seems to be heading.”

     Already this morning, October 7, I have read that a Texas church display of solidarity with Israel on its day of mourning was vandalized. Meanwhile, France is suffering from riots spearheaded by young leftists, migrants, and Islamists in cahoots. This is probably another example of the Marxist-Islamist alliance Netanyahu spoke about.

     The articles and evidence show shocking harassment of Jews, not just by outliers of society like the KKK and white supremacist groups, but by populist leftist anti-Zionists.

     As if things couldn’t get more absurd, anti-Zionists in NYC protested the mourning ceremonies by calling Mayor Mamdani complicit in genocide, amid calls to globalize the intifada.

 

‘Zionism is Racism’ Declares the UK’s Green Party and Canada Declares ‘Anti-Zionism is Antisemitism’

     The Green Party in Britain just held a vote and declared that Zionism is racism. Meanwhile, Canada has declared that anti-Zionism is antisemitism. Britain’s descent into antisemitism was once epitomized by the Labour Party's “Islamo-Communism under the doomed leadership of its "friend" of Hamas and Hezbollah, Jeremy Corbyn,” according to Ian Haworth in an article for Creators. It is commonplace for antisemites and anti-Zionists to have secular Jews, some of whom are only Jews by ethnicity, not specifically by religion, represent their views, as if to say there are Jews who support them. However, there is no reason Jews can’t be antisemitic or anti-Zionist. These Jews are, of course, very much in the minority.

     Haworth writes about antisemitism in Britain's National Health Service:

“In yet another example, the "Campaign Against Antisemitism" released its documentary this week, titled "Malignant: Antisemitism in the NHS." It documents the experiences of Jewish patients and providers in Britain's government-run, government-controlled and taxpayer-funded healthcare system, including Nazi salutes, anti-Semitic rants during surgery and throat-slitting threats by the very people tasked with caring for the physical and mental health of British citizens.”

     He notes that many of the doctors, nurses, midwives and therapists are Muslims. He suggests that some Jews are afraid to go to the doctor, of being subjected to hate by Muslims.

     Danny Cohen writes in the Telegraph about the British Green Party:

“The Greens’ obsessive focus on Gaza is a very significant factor. It is a party uninterested in any other conflict or humanitarian crisis taking place around the world. The result of this disproportionate focus by the Greens and others is that the Jewish State is being portrayed as uniquely evil. This fuels anti-Semitism in Britain and around the world.”

     Canada’s declaration that anti-Zionism is antisemitism is an interesting turn of events. Since many people, including a lot of the Progressives I have encountered, are fond of declaring they are anti-Zionist, not antisemitic, I wonder what they would think of it.

     Michael Geist writes that anti-Zionism is often just a workaround:

“…anti-Zionism is too often thinly veiled antisemitism, as if substituting the word Zionist for Jew renders the unacceptable acceptable.”

     The statement, issued by Public Safety Canada, says, more specifically, that antisemitism includes anti-Zionism as noted below:

“Antisemitism, which includes anti-Zionism, is not always obvious. While some incidents involve explicit threats, violence, or hate speech, others may take the form of conspiracy theories, Holocaust denial, coded language, stereotypes, or the collective blaming of Jewish people. Recognizing antisemitism consistently is an essential first step toward responding effectively.”

 

 

The Film ‘Naza’ (Likely) Reveals IDF’s Collateral Damage Strategy Worthy of Criticism, but Not Genocide

     Urban warfare is difficult. It is especially difficult with an enemy that has perfected suicide bombing, the utilization of human shielding, and the embedding of military assets at hospitals, schools, and mosques. The population has been highly indoctrinated from a young age to hate Israelis and Jews. Its government has long been widely recognized as one of the premier terrorist organizations in the world. It reveres death via martyrdom. It does not care about its civilians being harmed and uses them in a way that they are likely to be harmed. The IDF makes phone calls, distributes leaflets, and tells people to evacuate before it bombs military assets. It may not do so when it is targeting specific terrorists in smaller operations. It also makes mistakes in targeting and allows a certain amount of unavoidable collateral damage, arguably too much. It is a fair argument to make that the IDF allows too much collateral damage and has, in some cases, committed war crimes. To this very day, Israel notes that Hamas is rebuilding its military capabilities. Just recently, weapons were found in an aid shipment. Recruitment is also up. Hamas still refuses to disarm.

     The recent movie Naza, with its bizarre 25-minute standing ovation in Europe, has helped to fire up anti-Zionists. Bilge Ebiri for Vulture.com calls it one of the most important films of our time, noting that the information in the film has long been available through Palestinian journalists:

“Palestinian journalists have reported on these facts. In other words, the information has been out there for months, and much of the world has shrugged, if not ignored it completely.”

     I will simply point out that Israel has proven that many Palestinian journalists are members of Hamas, some even participating in the October 7 massacre. Surely, we should take their views with a grain of salt.

     Of course, I have not seen the film, but I have heard that it tries to equate the IDF to Nazis and its treatment of Gazans to the Holocaust. One article in Haaretz notes that even the name Naza suggests both Nazi and Gaza, although that may well be coincidental rather than intentional.

     Certainly, the destruction in Gaza is horrific, and it has been used to justify hatred of Israel. However, it is not that different from the destruction wreaked by Russia and Syria on Syria’s cities or the destruction by Russia of Ukrainian front-line towns or the destruction in other wars. Additionally, the IDF was bombing to destroy a vast network of military tunnels stretching for many tens of miles that was paid for by Qatari donors, the UN, and even by U.S. aid, as Hamas diverted aid funds to military uses.

     Israel likely overreacted to the October 7 massacre and overly sought revenge, resulting in the committing of war crimes, especially early in the retaliation cycle.




     Amos Harel writes in Haaretz:

“Still, the procedures for collateral damage authorizations have become stricter, and the number of civilians who were killed this year in the Strip fell considerably. In the first months of the war there was a rampage, part of which was a bottom-up initiative, and part was a top-down directive. Many officers confirm this in not-for-attribution interviews.”

“The bottom line of what has been described here is clear enough: Israel committed war crimes in Gaza, both by soldiers acting on their own and in operations by units and teams, which were part of a broader system. There are similarities to the way the Americans operated in urban combat in Iraq and Syria (in the campaign against ISIS in particular).”

     Former Israeli prime minister Naftali Bennet noted about the movie:

“What makes it especially painful and infuriating is that this lie comes from Israeli filmmakers and is now being spread around the world,” Bennett posted on X the day after the premiere.”

“If Israel wanted to hurt the people of Gaza, we would not send our sons and daughters to fight house to house, through alleyways and tunnels, at the terrible cost of our own soldiers being killed and wounded,” he argued, adding that “The war in Gaza is terrible. The death of every child is a tragedy. But a terrible war is not genocide.”

     Around 1000 IDF troops have been killed in the Gaza conflict thus far.

     Israeli October 7 hostage Omer Shem Tov writes that Israel’s Naza policy saved lives, likely his, but mostly Palestinian lives:

“Shem Tov, who was kidnapped on October 7, 2023, from the Nova music festival near the Gaza border, recounted an instance when the mother of one of his captors received a phone call from the IDF warning her of an imminent airstrike.”

“Hamas knew where I was and left me to die. Israel didn’t know my location, but it knew where my captor’s mother was and called to make sure she wasn’t killed accidentally,” he wrote. “There I was — kidnapped, starved and tortured by her son — while my army was trying to keep his mother alive.”

“He said his captors in Gaza celebrated death and destruction on both sides: “For Hamas, destruction itself could be victory. As long as there was death on either side, Hamas could win.”

“Shem Tov said that “Israel desperately wanted me home. But not at any price. There were Palestinian civilians between Israel and me. So Israel dropped leaflets, sent messages, made phone calls and ordered evacuations. It tried to minimize NAZA, or collateral damage.”

“The freed hostage suggested that Israel “paid a price” for its efforts to reduce civilian casualties: “They gave Hamas time. They exposed Israeli soldiers to greater danger. And they left hostages like me waiting longer.”

“If Israel had cared less about NAZA, perhaps I would have come home sooner,” he added. “Fewer Israeli soldiers might have died. Fewer hostages might have died. But more Palestinians would have.”

 

 

The LA Review Spikes Interview with Pro-Israel Jew Shai Davidai

     Shai Davidai is the author of a new book, American Intellectual Antisemitism: The Anti-Jewish Movement Tearing Through Our Universities, which details anti-Jewish sentiment being propagated at American universities. I fairly commonly see “Free Gaza” or “Free Palestine” graffiti near my local university, but a few days ago I did see a sticker that said “Stop Framing Israel,” which, frankly, was encouraging.

     The senior editor of the LA Review pulled the interview, calling Davidai a toxic and controversial figure. Davidai commented:

“Ironically, part of the book concerns these exact distortions and erasures in the media,” he told The Post.

“What’s most shocking is that they’re saying the quiet parts out loud,” he added, blasting “the double standard” at work.

“It was clear to me it wasn’t about her not asking the right questions, but about her asking the wrong person.”

     This is from a publication that was happy to feature anti-Zionist protest leader Mahmoud Khalil in what has been called “fawning.”

     In Part 1 of this essay, I wrote about antisemitism in the publishing industry. Here Davidai notes that he had a hard time finding a publisher for his book, according to the New York Post:

“It’s a fraught time for Jewish and pro-Israel authors dealing with “blacklists” and “boycotts,” and Davidai said that he was rejected by 36 out of 38 publishers before finding a home with Wicked Son, an imprint of Post Hill Press that is distributed by Simon & Schuster.”

“The human behavior researcher went from celebrated staffer – who was regularly published in journals and mainstream outlets and collected awards like “best 40 under 40 MBA professors of 2023” – to being barred from the classroom and campus.”

“He finally left the poison Ivy last year after spurious charges against him were ultimately dropped. The New York-based academic went on to join the Institute for the Study of Global Antisemitism and Policy as a research fellow.”

     Raihaana Adira is a Canadian Ismaili Muslim who considers herself to be a Zionist. She praises the Abraham Accords as a potential beginning of better relations between Israel and Muslim countries. She describes the difficulty of simply having pro-Israel views at her Canadian University:

“When anti-Israel protesters tried to shut down my graduation at McGill this summer, it felt less about opposing the war in Gaza and more about whether someone with my views belonged in the room. That same absolutism drives the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement against Israel, which presents itself as a campaign for Palestinian rights but actually calls for cutting the research and business ties that connect Israelis and Palestinians. On campus, the movement treats dissent as morally suspect, not merely a differing opinion.”

 

Genocide, Urban Warfare, and Civilian Casualties

     The New York Post Editorial Board writes:

“Urban warfare expert John Spencer, who’s studied the war in Gaza, reports that Jerusalem has “implemented more civilian harm mitigation measures than any military in history.”

“That includes not just calling off strikes and diverting missiles mid-flight rather than skirt the rules of war, but also informing civilians in advance of an attack by phone and leaflets, using pinpoint targeting and more.”

“And it doesn’t just avoid casualties; IDF soldiers have actually risked their lives to protect civilians — from Hamas.”

     A Progressive Facebook friend of mine posted the following meme.




     Sure, that looks bad. It is unfortunate that such a level of destruction happened. Could the area have been cleared of terrorists in another way? Possibly, but I would guess unlikely.

     Is it a genocide? Not by definition. It may be objectionable to many but does not fit the definition of a genocide.




     The Gaza Health Ministry, run by Hamas, tabulates Gazan casualties. Apparently, they do not differentiate normal deaths from war deaths, but they do release the ages of the dead. They recently released numbers that show most deaths among males of the age usually utilized in war. With recent footage and information gathered about Iran’s mass killing of protestors last January, it is possible that Iran killed more civilians in two days than Israel killed in Gaza in three years. There is one difference. Iran intended to kill each and every one of those civilians and continues to execute others who were imprisoned at the time, typically hanging them from cranes with public viewing.

     If only 76% of the dead were war dead, then the 72,000+ number would become 55,000+, with somewhere around half of those likely being Hamas fighters. By the standards of modern urban warfare, that’s pretty good, and it shows that they have been trying to reduce civilian casualties rather than committing genocide.




 

Antisemitism at a 50-Year High as is Spending for Security at Synagogues and Jewish Centers: West Bank Violence Offers a Talking Point for Anti-Zionists and Antisemites

     A recent poll shows that sentiment in the U.S. favors Palestinians over Israelis for the first time.

“Slightly more American voters say their sympathies lie more with Palestinians than Israelis, according to a new poll from Quinnipiac University, adding to evidence of the growing animosity toward Israel among the U.S. electorate.”

     Other polls have shown the same. Among the changes are more conservatives following the lead of rampant anti-Israel prognosticator and all-around shmuck Tucker Carlson.

     New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman has compared right-wing Israeli actions in the West Bank with Nazi hate campaigns. While there is no doubt that some ultra-right-wing Israelis are racists, it is surely a small minority. Yes, there are Jewish supremacists, and some are active in the West Bank as settlers, and yes, the Israeli government has likely not done enough to counteract them. It would help if there were not far-right members in Israel’s current ruling coalition.

     Robert Cherry in the Washington Examiner notes that the West Bank has a long history, much of it involving anti-Jewish actions by Palestinians.

“As religious Jews began rebuilding their houses of study in Hebron, they were attacked by Islamists, including Tayseer Abu Sneineh. He was sentenced to life imprisonment for the 1980 killing of six Jews at the Hadassah House, home to a Hebron yeshiva. He was released in a prison exchange in 1983 and returned from exile a decade later to a hero’s welcome; and for the last decade, he has been Hebron’s mayor.”

     The article compares treatment of Palestinians in East Jerusalem to treatment of Palestinian “refugees” in Jordan:

“Though they lack Israeli citizenship, East Jerusalem Palestinians are free to travel throughout the country and face few employment or educational barriers. By contrast, 1 million stateless Palestinians living in Jordan and Lebanon face severe restrictions. When the head of the Jordanian human rights commission sought improvements, she met fierce opposition within the government: “When we talk about civil rights, political rights and so on, they would say ‘Well, we don’t want to help Israelis achieve their goals by giving those people access to all types of activities and normal living so that they could forget about their right of return.’”

“None of this denies that right-wing extremists have been given a free hand in the West Bank and cause serious damage to Palestinian communities there.”

     Cherry also cites the West Bank city of Jaffa as a place where Muslims and Jews have refrained from violence by design, with positive results in relations.

     However, West Bank settler violence is quite rampant in other places, and the IDF reportedly allows it to happen and, in a few cases, even has participated. This is unacceptable. Israel has been accused of ethnic cleansing. At most, they are allowing it to happen, and they need to stop it from happening. Opposing Israeli policy in the West Bank is legitimate, not antisemitic, although as we saw in Part 1 of this essay, in the section about NYC housing, it can be used in an antisemitic manner.

     Leading U.S. reform Rabbi Ammiel Hirsch recently noted that hatred of Israel was corrupting the U.S. He noted:

“While pervasive anti-Jewish hostility is not new, it is new to us. We grew up in what has been described as the ‘Golden Age’ of American Jewry,” he said, according to a transcript shared with The Times of Israel before the speech. “It is this clear and obvious change that has so unnerved us.”

     Jews are targeted in hate crimes far more than any other group in New York City, with at least 229 confirmed antisemitic hate crimes so far this year, according to NYPD data.

“Hirsch warned that hatred of Israel and animosity toward Jews in politics, the intellectual sphere, and online were damaging US society.”

“Jew-hatred is harming America. We are not only worried about ourselves. We are worried about the country we love,” Hirsch said. “Unhinged and obsessive loathing of Israel is corrupting American values. If allowed to spread, it is not only Jews who will pay the price. America will too.”

     An article in Psy Post by Eric Dolan about a recent study published in American Psychologist notes that after October 7, antisemitism spiked, especially among liberals:

“Hate crimes against Jewish people in the United States spiked following the onset of the Israel-Hamas war in October 2023, rising from 11% of all hate crimes in the year before the war to 27% in the year after. Historically, political liberals have been fiercely protective of minority groups and quick to condemn discrimination. In fact, a study covered by PsyPost in 2022 found that, before the war, agreement with overtly antisemitic statements was two to three times higher on the American far right than on the far left.”

     The researchers argued:

“…by 2025, 75% of Republicans but only 21% of Democrats said their sympathies lay with Israelis, which they argued may make criticism of Israel a marker of liberal identity. They proposed two potential psychological mechanisms: ingroup favoritism, where a justification signals shared political views, and alliance politics, where a justification implies the speaker is not indiscriminately hateful toward other groups.”

“Moon said the team was surprised by how participants responded to a conspiracy trope long associated with the political right. “One of the justifications we included was the trope that Jews hold too much power and influence over financial markets, governments, and the media,” he explained. “Historically in the U.S., this has been a right-coded justification. However, in our experiment, participants thought the profile uttering this trope was more politically liberal than the profile expressing unjustified antisemitism, and this trope had a similar effect in licensing antisemitism as the disapproval of Israel and the war in Gaza justification.”

     A New York Post article reports that synagogues and other Jewish institutions across America spent more than $1 billion on security last year. They reported that over 60% of all religiously motivated US hate crimes in 2025 were against Jews, despite Jews comprising under 3% of the population. The problem has gotten so bad that this year Gov. Kathy Hochul allocated $70 million in state funds to bolster city Jewish centers’ security measures during this year’s high holidays.




     Jews at U.S. state assemblies and at Green Party headquarters in the UK have had to be isolated due to the prevalence of hate against them. One incident in March 2026 in Michigan involved a Muslim man ramming a Jewish children’s school with a vehicle full of explosives with the clear intention to kill Jewish children. He nearly succeeded. When the story broke, it was suggested he was somewhat justified since his two brothers were killed by the IDF in Lebanon. However, they were not civilians but part of a Hezbollah rocket unit. He didn’t succeed simply because the center buffed up its security;

“Bollards had been installed at entrances. The doors were bulletproof. Just weeks before the attack, FBI agents led active shooter preparedness training for clergy and staff.”

“We’ve been talking for two weeks about the potential, sadly, for this happening,” Oakland County Sheriff Michael Bouchard said at a press conference that day.

     Similar bombings were attempted in the Netherlands and the UK in the days that followed. Antisemitic incidents more than doubled in the UK from 2022 to 2025. This is in addition to the more routine arsons, swastika graffiti, and the like.

     Antisemitism used to be considered a right-wing-driven problem. Now it is clearly a left-wing-driven problem, despite the Tucker Carlson crowd. Lots of left-wingers are also pro-Russian, like Carlson, especially the Marxists and socialists who basically share a worldview with the Soviets. Both views are disturbing.

 

The Origins of Anti-Zionism Are in Nazi Europe and the Soviet Union: Dara Horn   

      Jewish author Dara Horn recently wrote:

“The through line of antisemitism for thousands of years has been the denial of truth and the promotion of lies. These lies range in scope from conspiracy theories to Holocaust denial to the blood libel to the currently popular claims that Zionism is racism, that Jews are settler colonialists, and that Jewish civilization isn’t native to the land of Israel. These lies are all part of the foundational Big Lie: that antisemitism itself is a righteous act of resistance against evil, because Jews are collectively evil and have no right to exist. Today, the Big Lie is winning.”

     After being involved as a part of Harvard’s Antisemitism advisory group in 2023, she notes:

“You realize the depth of this 30-year investment and the role of this hate movement in teaching [antisemitism]… There’s obviously been a lot of press about the protests at universities in the US, but to me, the story that was totally missed was that they are teaching antisemitic lies as facts, and saturating it to the point where it’s in everything. You’re taking an English class, and it’s about decolonizing Palestine. It’s in the graduate school of education and the school of public health. This is a plot,” Horn said.

     Horn’s solution to the problem of antisemitism, particularly the kind that shows up at universities, is better and more historically accurate education. Importantly, she notes that Anti-Zionism actually originated before the state of Israel existed.

     In the video below she states that right-wing and left-wing antisemitism are the same. She proceeds to tell the story of a Nazi ideologue and author. He designed the Third Reich’s educational curriculum. After the war, he first escaped to Argentina, then to Egypt, where he was hired by the Egyptian government to write anti-Israel propaganda for the Arab League. He did this till his death in the 1960s, having converted to Islam. His work was translated into Russian, which the Soviets used to inform their own anti-Zionist campaign in the 1960s. She says the slogans used were the same: Zionism is racism, etc.


Video | Facebook



The Abrahamic Movement

     For many years, several decades, there have been attempts to ease the ethnic tensions between Israelis and Palestinians and between Jews and Muslims. One is the Abrahamic Movement, which seeks members of both faiths to acknowledge and embrace their common origins as Abrahamic faiths. The movement’s founder, Tom Wegner, notes that Europe achieved a more lasting peace through a sense of shared identity. He thinks the Jewish and Muslim worlds can do the same by emphasizing shared origins. This is not unprecedented, as there was a period in the past in some parts of the world in the 8th-12th centuries, known in some places as the Jewish-Arab Golden Age. Most of the modern hostilities result from 20th-century actions, despite a much longer history of antisemitism in the world. The movement may help relations, but I don’t see it as a final solution. Someone I worked with in the oilfields told me once about a discussion about religion between a Christian, a Muslim, and an Atheist. The Muslim said he could accept the Christian but not the Atheist. That reminded me of how the Muslim invaders in the early Middle Ages in India dealt with the Indian Theists and Buddhists. The Indian Theists, or Hindus, as they are known today, were accepted as fellow “people of the book” who believed in God. The Buddhists were considered to be atheists who don’t believe in God and were oppressed, and many were enslaved. That story simply shows that solidarity can be used for both acceptance and rejection. While a shared identity can lead to acceptance, a non-shared identity can lead to non-acceptance. The shared identity phenomenon is all about in-group and out-group dynamics. Ultimately, we need to move away from such dynamics, but it may be the beginning of something better: acceptance for all. Right now, Jewish-Muslim relations are more important than the potential pitfalls of Jews and Muslims outcasting other groups.

     Interestingly, Wegner states that he wants to formulate a politically moderate alternative to extremist ideological groups like the Muslim Brotherhood. That is needed.

“Losing your honor in this part of the world is worse than losing your life. When it comes to Arab and Muslim society, you’re better off losing your life than losing your honor,” he said, highlighting that Hezbollah, Hamas, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, and every other enemy of Israel face the choice to die in battle as a martyr or sacrifice their honor by surrendering to Israel.”

“If we understand that killing all the radicals is not a very good or solid plan, then we should ask ourselves what the way out is. And over here, the Abrahamic Movement represents a way out for many reasons.... It implies that this is common ground, and when you come to common ground, that’s not surrendering,” he said. “That’s an identity that both of us can live with, without losing our honor.”

     Wegner has suggested that “The Quran is a Zionist document,” and often cites the Quran and his knowledge if it in support of his arguments.

     He emphasizes the importance of diplomacy:

“If we really want to speak with the Muslim world and create some sort of dialogue, the whole approach of saying ‘Muhammad was a pedophile,’ or all that jazz that basically tries to contradict Islam at face value, is not relevant. It’s not helping anyone,” he insisted. “It’s only creating more animosity and tension.”

“We can probably get better results if we speak to our cousins the way cousins speak to each other, focusing on our shared heritage and the things that are common to us.”

      Muslims in many countries, especially when there are high illiteracy rates, are subjected to anti-Jewish propaganda from a young age.  Thus, better education could help lessen widespread beliefs in anti-Jewish conspiracy theories. The reality is that in many Muslim countries there is no freedom of religion, something we take for granted. People can be imprisoned for things like simply supporting normalization of Israel, as happened in Iraq. That should be unacceptable. These are laws that promote and enforce hatred. Normalization is clearly needed and would benefit all. The Abraham Accords and the Abrahamic Movement are a start.


 

References, Part 1 and 2:

 

The academic case for blaming the Southport riots on Zionism is chilling. Nicole Lampert. The Telegraph. September 3, 2026. The academic case for blaming the Southport riots on Zionism is chilling

Jews at US teachers unions subject to discrimination, forced to self-censor: report. Luke Tress. Times of Israel. August 27, 2026. Jews at US teachers unions subject to discrimination, forced to self-censor: report

The 'Gaza genocide' is a hoax. David Harsanyi. Creators. September 2, 2026. The 'Gaza genocide' is a hoax

When every Hollywood cause becomes an anti-Israel cause. Yuval David, Washington Examiner. August 28, 2026. When every Hollywood cause becomes an anti-Israel cause

Deluded Western activists must stop shouting over actual Palestinians like me. Nicole Lampert. The Telegraph. August 28, 2026. Deluded Western activists must stop shouting over actual Palestinians like me

Opinion: Just war is not the same as 'genocide'. Opinion by Dan Pollak. The Hill. September 3, 2026. Opinion: Just war is not the same as 'genocide'

In protests and politics, 'Zionists' are being blamed for NYC housing woes. Luke Tress. The Times of Israel. September 7, 2026. In protests and politics, 'Zionists' are being blamed for NYC housing woes

The poison of anti-Semitism has seeped into the fabric of British society. Danny Cohen. The Telegraph. September 8, 2026. The poison of anti-Semitism has seeped into the fabric of British society

Antisemitism charges plague the literary world. New publishers are pushing back. Pamela Paul. September 10, 2026.  Antisemitism charges plague the literary world. New publishers are pushing back.

Fox News 'Antisemitism Exposed' newsletter: Hate steals the show. Fox News Staff. Fox News. September 10, 2026. Fox News 'Antisemitism Exposed' newsletter: Hate steals the show

Naza Is One of the Most Important Films of Our Time. Bilge Ebiri, Vulture.com. Naza Is One of the Most Important Films of Our Time

IDF rejects testimonies in Israeli-made documentary about AI-powered killing in Gaza. AFP, ToI Staff. Times of Israel. September 11, 2026.  IDF rejects testimonies in Israeli-made documentary about AI-powered killing in Gaza

US support for Palestinians continues to eclipse sympathy for Israelis, poll shows. Arno Rosenfeld. Haaretz. September 11, 2026. US support for Palestinians continues to eclipse sympathy for Israelis, poll shows

Voices: Confronting Jewish terrorism is not an act of Jew hate. Opinion by Alan Rusbridger. The Independent. September 12, 2026. Voices: Confronting Jewish terrorism is not an act of Jew hate

If Israel’s war in Gaza is 'genocide,' so is every modern war ever fought. Opinion by David Harsanyi, Washington Examiner. September 16, 2026. If Israel’s war in Gaza is 'genocide,' so is every modern war ever fought

Top UN Aid Official Says Hamas Is Not a Terrorist Group. Foundation for Defense of Democracies. February 16, 2026. Top UN Aid Official Says Hamas Is Not a Terrorist Group

Britain's NHS: Waitlists, taxes and Jew-hatred. Ian Haworth. The Telegraph. September 15, 2026. Britain's NHS: Waitlists, taxes and Jew-hatred

Britain’s Jews are right to fear the Greens. Opinion by Danny Cohen. The Telegraph. September 18, 2026. Britain’s Jews are right to fear the Greens

Jewish centers spent more than $1 billion on security last year as antisemitism soars across US. Alex Oliveira. New York Post. September 17, 2026. Jewish centers spent more than $1 billion on security last year as antisemitism soars across US

LA Review of Books spikes interview with pro-Israel professor Shai Davidai: 'Double standard'. Doree Lewak. New York Post. September 18, 2026. LA Review of Books spikes interview with pro-Israel professor Shai Davidai: 'Double standard'

The Fury Over 'NAZA' Doesn't Change the Bottom Line: Israel Committed War Crimes in Gaza. Amos Harel. Haaretz. September 18, 2026. The Fury Over 'NAZA' Doesn't Change the Bottom Line: Israel Committed War Crimes in Gaza

The left lobs yet another 'big lie' on Israel — and the fallout keeps getting worse. Opinion by Post Editorial Board. New York Post. September 18, 2026. The left lobs yet another 'big lie' on Israel — and the fallout keeps getting worse

I’m a Muslim Zionist. Anti-Israel activists have it completely backward. Raihaana Adira, Washington Examiner. September 19, 2026. I’m a Muslim Zionist. Anti-Israel activists have it completely backward

'I am pro-Abraham': Meet the unlikely allies risking everything for peace with Israel. Danielle Greyman-Kennard. The Jerusalem Post. September 19, 2026. 'I am pro-Abraham': Meet the unlikely allies risking everything for peace with Israel

‘Mein Kampf in reverse’? How the New York Times weaponizes Holocaust metaphors against Israel. Robert Cherry, Washington Examiner. September 19, 2026. ‘Mein Kampf in reverse’? How the New York Times weaponizes Holocaust metaphors against Israel

Leading US Reform rabbi in Yom Kippur sermon: Unhinged, obsessive loathing of Israel is corrupting US values. Luke Tress. The Times of Israel. September 21, 2026. Leading US Reform rabbi in Yom Kippur sermon: Unhinged, obsessive loathing of Israel is corrupting US values

Rebutting ‘NAZA,’ freed hostage says he knows what its like ‘to be collateral damage.’ The Times of Israel. September 23, 2026. Rebutting 'NAZA,' freed hostage says he knows what it's like 'to be collateral damage' | The Times of Israel

Mamdani’s genocide lie: How NYC’s mayor turned Hamas’s atrocities into Israel’s crime. Mendi Glik. Washington Examiner. September 24, 2026.

What if Israel isn’t committing genocide in Gaza? Faisal Kutty. Newsweek. September 25, 2026.

Silent on Sudan, loud on Israel: Your antisemitism is showing. Even R. Bernstein. Washington Examiner. September 25, 2026.

Opinion: If Trump is serious about antisemitism, he should reopen this lifeline for refugees. Opinion by Mia Emmunah Toubian and Jason Bryan Silverstein. The Hill. September 27, 2026. Opinion: If Trump is serious about antisemitism, he should reopen this lifeline for refugees

We know today's leftwing antizionism comes directly from Nazi anti-Jewish theology. Dara Horn. Zionism and Anti-Zionism. (1) Video | Facebook

Anti-Zionists are the real racists: Infiltrated by Gaza-obsessed entryists, the Green Party will this weekend debate the Soviet-inspired motion: ‘Zionism is racism’. Nicole Lampert. The Telegraph. October 1, 2026. Anti-Zionists are the real racists

Gaza Health Ministry makes massive blunder, releases health numbers debunking their own genocide narrative. C. Douglas Golden. October 2, 2026.  Gaza Health Ministry makes massive blunder, releases health numbers debunking their own genocide narrative

Left-wing justifications partly shield antisemitism from liberal disapproval, study suggests. Eric W. Dolan. Psy Post. October 3, 2026. Left-wing justifications partly shield antisemitism from liberal disapproval, study suggests

The war on European Jews and the new reality of American Jewish life. Daniel Ross Goodman, Washington Examiner. October 4, 2026. The war on European Jews and the new reality of American Jewish life

Petitioner calls for the removal of member from season 2 of Heated Rivalry amid pro-Zionist claims. Caroline Gaspich. The Mirror. October 2, 2026. Petitioner calls for the removal of member from season 2 of Heated Rivalry amid pro-Zionist claims

Greens are forced to give Jewish delegates safe room at 'febrile' party conference. Glen Owen and Lee Harpin. Daily Mail. October 3, 2026. Greens are forced to give Jewish delegates safe room at 'febrile' party conference

Greens branded UK's 'first openly anti-Semitic party' as members pass Zionism is racism motion. Sophie Church and David Wilcock. Daily Mail. October 4, 2026. Greens branded UK's 'first openly anti-Semitic party' as members pass Zionism is racism motion

DSA groups walk back post calling Oct. 7 ‘resistance against imperialism’.  Hudson Crozier. Washington Examiner. October 6, 2026. DSA groups walk back post calling Oct. 7 massacre 'resistance'

A Definition That Meets the Moment: Federal Government Recognizes Antisemitism Includes Anti-Zionism. Michael Geist. September 25, 2026. A Definition That Meets the Moment: Federal Government Recognizes Antisemitism Includes Anti-Zionism - Michael Geist

Dara Horn tackles enduring antisemitic lies head-on with optimistic ‘Final Solution’. Renee Ghert-Zand. Times of Israel. September 3, 2026. Dara Horn tackles enduring antisemitic lies head-on with optimistic 'Final Solution' | The Times of Israel

     A Supreme Court case currently being considered involves climate change litigation. I have always been opposed to these efforts, seei...