Blog Archive

Wednesday, September 23, 2026

The Energy Illusion: Why Renewables Cannot Replace Oil & Gas. Justin L. Lurie. Five Lions Publishers (2026): Book Review/Summary


     I saw a free download for an advance PDF copy of this book, and it looked interesting, so I downloaded it. This is a book about energy realism, something that I strongly support and that I believe is necessary if we are to make the best choices about energy. For many years I have read authors and reporters like Jude Clemente for Forbes and Robert Bryce as they argue for realistic views about energy. In terms of me reading this book, he is “preaching to the choir.” There are many quotable energy realism sentences in this book.

     This book is very practical and gives nice explanations to show why we simply can’t replace energy-dense, reliable, and affordable energy like oil & gas, with unreliable, intermittent, and higher cost (especially if battery systems are added) energy sources like wind and solar.  

This book makes a specific argument: Oil and gas remain central because they still carry scale, continuity, timing, and density better than alternatives in many of the world’s most demanding energy jobs. That does not mean every use is permanent. It does not mean innovation stops. It does not mean no system changes. It means only that modern life is organized around performance standards that remain unforgiving, and hydrocarbons still meet many of those standards more effectively than the public conversation often admits.”

     A key idea of Chapter 2 – Addition is Not Replacement, is that the cost of useful energy is greater than the cost of the production of that energy alone. The data show that there has only been addition, not replacement.

Aramco’s Amin Nasser stated the broader scale issue bluntly at the 2025 Energy Intelligence Forum: “Over the past decade, global primary energy demand has risen by the equivalent of around 40 million barrels of oil per day. Hydrocarbons supplied two-thirds of that growth, despite 11 trillion dollars being spent on transition.” That is a useful counterweight to the assumption that renewable growth alone proves replacement. It shows the same layering dynamic from another angle: large spending on transition technologies has occurred alongside continued growth in the hydrocarbon system because the total load has kept expanding.”

     Lurie notes that it is not just production that matters, but deliverability as well. We are experiencing that now, with the loss of energy being delivered from both the Middle East and Russia at the same time, which has been stressing markets. He notes that in order for a renewable energy source to actually replace dispatchable energy sources:

It must reach customers through real infrastructure. It must finance not only generation, but also grids, storage, backup, maintenance, and delivery. It must work through seasons, disruptions, price spikes, and growth.”

The central mistake in much of the energy debate is therefore not optimism about new technologies. Optimism is necessary. The mistake is confusing growth with displacement.”

     He notes that energy trading is often considered to be separate from producing and delivering energy, but he argues that it is a necessary part of the puzzle to get energy here it is needed at a fair price. Traded prices often expose constraints such as inadequate pipeline capacity or high crack spreads that expose scarcity of refined products. Energy trading systems connect supply to demand. He says that energy trading is closely linked to logistics, financing, and physical delivery. Electricity, he notes, is less tradable than oil and gas:

Electricity is tradable, but it is not tradable like oil or LNG. It must move through wires in real time, constrained by transmission capacity, congestion, balancing needs, and storage duration. When transmission is missing, generation cannot simply be placed on a ship and sent elsewhere. When output arrives at the wrong hour, storage or backup must cover the gap. That does not make renewable power unimportant. It means the trading architecture is less flexible than the global oil and gas system unless grids, storage, interconnection, and dispatch tools are expanded in parallel.”

     Chapter 3 explores ‘Industrialization in Emerging Markets.’ He notes that at the beginning of growth, it emerges physically, as, for instance, the movement of freight. Freight is seen as essential.

A corridor is not just a road or a rail line. It is a timed system. Its value lies in whether trucks clear it reliably, whether customs and handling are predictable enough to preserve schedules, and whether the fuel needed to move across it is available at tolerable cost.”

     Diesel and jet fuel are the fuels that predominantly move freight and that is likely to continue as electrifying these sectors has proven to be difficult. Corridors allow freight to move more quickly and at less cost. When they are disrupted, as in the Persian Gulf, currently, the implications cqn be dire. He does note that electrification of the heavy-duty transport sector is happening at a small scale, especially in China.

     Industrial heat, or process heat, is another area where fossil fuels reign because they often require temperatures that only burning fossil fuels can provide. Electric arc furnaces can take on some of these tasks at a higher cost, but the sector is not likely to electrify to a significant degree anytime soon. He considers refineries:

A refinery is not simply a fuel producer. It is an example of controlled industrial heat translated into saleable molecules at scale. Distillation, conversion, hydrotreating, and petrochemical integration all depend on stability, timing, maintenance discipline, and dependable throughput. That is what industrial depth looks like.”

     Petrochemicals are the result of using fuels as feedstocks for materials. Industrial societies require materials. Refineries keep those needed materials in production and make supply of those materials reliable. He stresses that hydrocarbons are not simply fuel but materials as well:

Packaging, coatings, fibers, solvents, films, detergents, pipes, medical components, and countless industrial inputs carry hydrocarbons inside the value chain.”

     He also stresses that reliability and predictability support growth while price volatility impedes it.

Growth is physical before it is statistical. It happens where goods move, heat holds, feedstocks arrive, and finance can finally see far enough ahead to trust the next step. Dense energy matters not because it is ideologically preferred, but because it remains one of the surest ways to widen what an economy can practically do.”

     Chapter 4 is about energy security. He notes that energy insecurity often leads to price volatility and volatility can be more damaging than a single high price. Price volatility impedes planning and price stability aids planning. Uncertainty about cost can be worse than the cost itself. He stresses the importance of spare capacity, as OPEC utilizes it. It may seem inefficient, but it allows the market to respond quickly to disruptions. The same is true of gas storage.

Time matters in energy security because rerouting is never instantaneous. Cargoes do not teleport. Tankers queue. Regas slots are limited. Pipelines cannot reverse themselves without engineering. Refineries cannot instantly run any crude in any configuration. Storage cannot be filled after the emergency has already arrived. Security depends on how much room an economy has between the first disturbance and the moment when somebody must start curtailing, bidding aggressively, or shutting down. Buffers are the difference between absorbing that interval and being ruled by it.”

     He notes that it is not the feedstock, crude oil, that is critical to daily life, but the refined products people use. This is borne out in the current shortage of these products and their inflated prices due to disruptions in the Middle East and Russia. Diesel is a global workhorse, and disruptions of its supply, which we are currently experiencing due to upheavals in the Middle East and Russia are showing our vulnerability in terms of higher prices for consumers and businesses. As we all well know, when fuel prices rise, the price of everything else also rises. Thus, disruption in diesel supply undermines energy security, especially for net importers. Storage and spare capacity can be seen as optionality. He states that energy security has a market price. Reliable supply also has security benefits through trade balances and industrial competitiveness.

Reliable energy allows a country to attract industry, run ports, support manufacturing, expand chemicals, operate data centers, move exports, stabilize utilities, and keep capital confident. In a competitive world, reliability itself becomes a form of industrial policy. The country that can promise energy availability at scale has an advantage over the country that can only promise ambition.”

     Import dependence is a vulnerability. Wealth also matters. High income countries that export have the most advantages, including optionality and the ability to handle volatility. He notes that the practical meaning of energy security is the ability to keep normal economic life functioning under stress.

     Getting back to the renewables replacing hydrocarbons myth, he notes that even though spending on renewables is beginning to exceed spending on hydrocarbons, investment in hydrocarbons, including coal, in 2025 is projected at $1.1 trillion. And that amount goes a lot farther with hydrocarbons in terms of reliable energy, specialist energy such as for industrial process heat, and for electricity with much higher utilization rates than renewables can achieve.

     He praises AI and automation for its role in optimization, reducing down time, ensuring precision, enabling faster decision-making, and for predictive maintenance, all of which help the entire system function better. He covers operational efficiency and optimization in the upstream, midstream, and downstream sectors. Predictive maintenance is especially valuable in the refining sector, where small issues can be costly.

A refinery is not just a machine. It is a schedule. Once that schedule breaks, value leaks out in every direction. Feed plans are disturbed. Offsites lurch. Operators stop optimizing and start stabilizing. Product balances tighten. That is why refinery utilization and refining performance appear repeatedly in company disclosures: the commercial value is not only in the asset, but in keeping the asset inside its planned rhythm.”

“…the value of digital systems lies in their ability to reduce operating chaos.”

“…the operating edge is procedural before it is digital. The software matters. But the chain of command, the thresholds, the restart logic, and the work sequence matter first.”

     Chapter 6: Access Before Transition, explores energy access and energy poverty, emphasizing that mere connection is not service.

     He cites the 2025 Sustainable Development Goal 7 (SDG7) tracking report, which estimates that 666 million people still lacked basic electricity access in 2023, while 2.1 billion people still relied on polluting fuels and technologies for cooking. Sub-Saharan Africa, where power grids and utilities are weak and poverty rates are high, is a major region that is lacking. It is also a place where, as I have pointed out elsewhere, the youth population is rising.  Simply connecting to energy is not enough, there needs to be reliable energy service that is adequate to meet modern needs. That is why a few hours of power or powering lights with a solar panel and small battery is not enough.

African Development Bank analysis points to the same pattern: brittle feeders, overloaded transformers, poor collection, and high service cost per connection recur as barriers. When utilities serve long lines badly, losses rise, bills go unpaid, and maintenance slips further. Service worsens. Customers hedge with generators, batteries, charcoal, kerosene, and whatever else keeps the household functioning. The system becomes more expensive to run and less able to earn its way out of fragility.”

     The region needs adequate power supply and service that people are willing to pay for. It needs to be adequately financed.

Lenders and concessional funders will not keep supporting a system that cannot distinguish between technical loss, commercial loss, and honest low-income demand. Reliability, collections, and creditworthiness do not move in sequence. They move together, or they fail together.”




     Many businesses, schools, and clinics in these countries with unreliable grid power, also must rely on diesel generators for backup. One study found that 15% of power-sector NOx emissions in Sub-Saharan Africa come from backup diesel generators. Power theft and meter tampering are also common in these areas of weak grids. People don’t want to pay for power that is not reliable and collection rates for power bills remain low. Those people must buy generator fuel as well.

     Clean cooking fuels are another huge challenge in Sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia. Where power is available and reliable, electricity can be used. LP gas is the cleanest of the fuels when the others are wood, charcoal, and kerosene. Even where LP gas is available, those other more polluting fuels are used as well. Women and children, as a result, suffer lung diseases and other health problems. Having an LP gas stove requires having a reliable supply of LP gas, usually a tank refill, which is not always the case.

Energy poverty is often a matter of insecure substitution rather than absolute absence.”

The energy challenge for the unserved and underserved is not solved by announcing a future portfolio. It is solved by making the next hour more dependable than the last. People live inside kilowatt-hours and reliable refills, not megawatt announcements. Access that does not hold is not access yet.”

     Chapter 7 considers future growth opportunities in the oil & gas sector, including LNG continuing to replace coal. Lurie notes that gas is where demand and infrastructure still reinforce each other most visibly. He notes the big spending in LNG infrastructure in recent years. He stresses that LNG deals rely on commitments from buyers, which push them to FIDs.

The wrong way to read the future is as a referendum on the whole sector. The better way is to ask which segments combine durable demand, scalable infrastructure, and operating discipline. Those are the segments where schedules can still be trusted long enough for capital to work.”

     Another opportunity for LNG, offshore wind, hydrogen, and CCUS projects is reusing existing offshore tiebacks to accelerate project timelines and decrease project costs.

Projects that can reuse hosts, subsea lines, export routes, and service ecosystems typically deliver greater calendar certainty than projects that must build every layer of infrastructure from scratch.”

     He also cites the repeatability and continued improvements of shale plays. Thus, shale plays will continue to be good opportunities for oil & gas. To summarize: offshore tech can benefit via reuse and shale can continue to benefit via repeatability.

     He presents downstream upgrades as an opportunity and cites growing refinery capacity utilization as proof. Refineries continue to be profitable, and now especially so as their products are in unprecedented demand compared to current choked supply. Refining margins were expected to be fairly flat before the current geopolitical events made them skyrocket.

     He stresses that timing of often the key to monetizing growth:

Growth becomes cash only when capacity arrives on time, runs steadily, and reaches customers inside a system that can actually absorb it.”

     Lurie states that future growth should be ranked rather than narrated.

     Chapter 8 explores refining, refined products, and pricing. We have all had a lesson in this in recent months, though it happened just after this book was finished. It really exemplifies the importance of timing, reliable supply, and reliable delivery. He stresses the importnac  eof geography in refining projections:

IEA projects 4.2 million barrels per day of new or expanded refining capacity through 2030, partly offset by 1.6 million barrels per day of announced closures. That is the shape of the market: new capacity is being added, but not everywhere, not equally, and not always close to the demand centers that feel product tightness first. Geography has become part of the price.”

     The current high fuel prices suck, whether we agree with the Iran war or not, and whether we agree that Ukraine should bomb Russian refineries or not. I wonder how the seasonal maintenance shutdowns will affect prices going into winter if these issues are not resolved. He notes optionality for refineries and crude buyers where in times of low demand more crude can be diverted to crude-to-chemicals and back to crude-to-fuels when demand is high. He notes, however, that the optionality is limited.  

     Next, he considers hydrogen, which is vital for refineries where it is used in hydrocracking and hydrotreating, including hydrodesulfurization. Desulfurization requirements use energy and are cost to run. Refineries need a reliable supply of hydrogen at low cost to best meet requirements and keep their own product costs low. Hydrogen constraints can impede capacity utilization.

     He notes the rising crack spread in April 2026, so the book’s timing is at least to then.

The market is also telling you what it values. Jet and diesel remain central to the margin story because middle-distillate cracks are often where product tightness becomes most visible. Hydrocracker reliability, FCC uptime, hydrogen availability, and maintenance timing are not background engineering details. They are part of the price-formation system.”

     The whole system sets the product prices, not just the cost of the crude feedstock.

     The final chapter is self-explanatory: Reliability is Designed. Reliability involves a chain of decisions.

That has been the thread running through this book. Chapter 3 showed that growth concentrates where freight, heat, and materials can be trusted. Chapter 4 showed that energy security is an economic condition before it is a geopolitical slogan. Chapter 5 showed that the operating edge is procedural before it is digital. Chapter 6 showed that access means dependable hours, not nominal connection. Chapter 8 showed that prices are increasingly written through the reliability of complex conversion systems rather than through crude abundance alone. Chapter 9 gathers those threads into one conclusion: prosperity depends less on declarations than on systems designed to work under stress.”

     He cites the reliability of supply in the form of available U.S. lease sales in the Gulf. He also sites the reliability of environmental law, or what has become known as regulatory certainty, noting that it doesn’t have to be perfect, but needs to be certain enough to attract capital and not delay decision making. He cites the industrial approach of Chevron in the Permian Basin where they operate according to a long-term plan, which ensures steadiness and reliability of production. They don’t respond to prices as much as companies that are more focused on short-term plans. Procurement, interconnection, and delivery contracts are all important for ensuring reliability. Functional port operations are vital for reliability. Permitting timelines can aid or impede reliability.

     He cites improved leak detection systems and faster leak response times as another technology that improves reliability and can reduce downtime. Disruption mitigation is key to successful operational optimization. He stresses the importance of adequate investment to reliability:

Underinvestment and logistics constraints do not have to be the only cause of instability to matter; they become dangerous because they reduce the system’s ability to absorb the shocks that commodity markets already face. Clearing backlogs is not just an engineering task. It is a stability policy.

That is the logic this book has been assembling chapter by chapter. Industrial growth depends on systems that move freight and hold heat. Security depends on supply that can be planned around. Operations depend on routines that keep small problems small. Access depends on reliable hours, not ceremonial connections. Prices are written by products and the systems that keep them flowing. The final lesson now comes into view: all of those truths are really about design.”

“…major operators still understand continuity, firm service, and dense fuels as governing variables in the real system.”

Reliability is what turns energy from a commodity into a civilization-scale service.”




     Energy abundance supports reliability by being available, accessible, and deliverable. He offers one last quip for reliability remaining to be the future of energy, noting we must be honest and realistic about our energy systems:

The task ahead is not to defend the past. It is to build a reliable future. That future will include new technologies, cleaner processes, better monitoring, lower emissions intensity, stronger grids, more efficient operations, and broader access to modern energy. But it must also include the fuels and infrastructure that continue to carry the heaviest burdens of the real economy.”

     This was a great book, emphasizing the importance of energy realism, operational optimization, effective disruption mitigation, optionality, and reliability, in our energy systems. There are many quotable sections which I include. As someone who has favored energy realism for a long time, I am quite familiar to many of the book’s arguments, so he is “preaching to the choir” here. The book did not offer me that much that was new to me, but others not so well informed should read it.

 

Tuesday, September 22, 2026

EIA: Public Companies Comprise Just 2% of Total U.S. Oil & Gas Companies, but Are Responsible for 68% of Total U.S. Oil & Gas Production

 

     I have had the opportunity to work for both public and private oil & gas companies in the Appalachian region, where, according to this analysis, 80% of oil and 85% of natural gas are produced by public companies, but they only make up 1% of total companies. I have also done consulting work for a private company drilling the Haynesville Shale in Louisiana and Texas, where private companies produce 55% of the natural gas.

     As the title of the post notes, 68% of U.S. oil & gas is produced by publicly traded companies, but they only make up 2% of the total oil & gas producing companies. Private companies include companies funded by private equity and small operating companies that produce a lot of low-profit-margin wells with small amounts of production, aka. stripper wells.




     EIA notes that there are about 12,000 oil & gas producing companies in the U.S. and 2%, or roughly 240 companies, are public companies.

Massive scale, prime drilling locations, and advanced technologies help publicly traded oil and gas producers maintain their edge on production. Publicly traded companies generally report lower breakeven prices—the minimum price needed to cover operating costs—than privately held companies. These lower breakeven prices are driven in part by higher-quality acreage holdings that yield higher volumes of oil and gas. The immense size of the public producers also gives them economies of scale that lower the cost of production.”

The 12 firms with the most wells make up less than 1% of the companies, but they each operate from 10,000 to over 50,000 wells, producing an average of 39,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day per well. In contrast, 64% of all operators have 10 or fewer wells, which are nearly all stripper wells, producing less than 15 barrels of oil equivalent per day.”







     The Appalachian and Permian regions are where private companies have the highest share of companies and the lowest share of production. As I suggested above, the Haynesville is the only region where private companies produce more than public companies; in this case, it is about 99% natural gas.  

In the Haynesville, production is concentrated among the largest private producers. The top five private natural gas operators alone produced 38%, or 5.8 billion cubic feet per day, of the region's natural gas output.”

     


 

References:

 

Public companies produce most U.S. crude oil and natural gas. Energy Information Administration. September 22, 2026. Public companies produce most U.S. crude oil and natural gas - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

 

Heating Oil Prices Will Likely Cause Economic Hardships in the Oil-Dependent U.S. Northeast: Heating Assistance is Up and Has Been Expedited After Bipartisan Push


      Many of us have long argued that the U.S. Northeast was too dependent on heating oil. Compared to natural gas and LP Gas, heating oil is more expensive, much worse for air quality, and has higher carbon emissions. Prices for the petroleum distillate fuels are likely to remain high into the winter as disruptions in the Middle East and Russia strain global refined products markets. Petroleum distillates are refined products that are produced from crude oil delivered to refineries. It takes time for such products to be made available to buyers. With functional refinery capacity way down in Russia, a major oil products exporter, due to Ukrainian attacks, and with deliveries of refined products limited in the Middle East, another major exporter, it is unlikely that supply will rise and prices will lower in time for winter.   

     People facing a potential doubling of their winter fuel bills are understandably concerned, even if they should have been aware of the possibility. They will likely pay far more than double what a natural gas user pays. They would be better off installing a heat pump or an LP gas tank, lines, and appliances, or getting a natural gas hookup. I bought a house in the late 90s that had a fireplace, a wood burner in the basement, and an oil furnace. We installed a propane/LPG system, including outdoor and indoor piping, converted the stove to LPG, and installed unvented LPG heaters. It was more expensive than hooking up to natural gas, but there were no gas lines available for hookup. We sold the oil furnace.




     As the article in The Cool Down notes, people in Eastern Pennsylvania are facing a near doubling of fuel oil prices from $3 to $5.50 per gallon. This is on top of rising electricity and food prices. One person noted:

"The spike in utilities and heating oil and gas is outrageous, along with the food prices. It's just unsustainable for people. People are going to have to choose between eating and heating their home."

     As a result, people are weatherizing more, and more people are enrolling for government heating cost assistance.

     The price in Maine was $5.77/gal. prompting GOP Senator Susan Collins to lead a bipartisan effort to expedite the release of federal heating assistance. Maine has over 300,000 heating oil customers. The Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program, or LIHEAP, provides for many seniors and low-income residents around the country. According to The Maine Wire:

In April, Collins announced that HHS had released another $421.5 million nationally in fiscal year 2026 LIHEAP funding after Collins, Reed and Murkowski led another bipartisan request for the remaining money to be distributed.”

LIHEAP provides vital relief to thousands of Mainers, helping them avoid the constant worry of choosing between heating their homes and covering other basic necessities,” Collins said following that release.”

     The Maine Wire article also points out that heating assistance dollars are not going as far if they don’t adjust to pricing. The National Energy Assistance Directors Association (NEADA) is calling for a funding increase for LIHEAP.

     In New York, heating oil prices have reached $6.14/gal, up from $3.70 a year earlier.

The National Energy Assistance Directors Association projected this week that U.S. households relying on heating oil will pay 31.3% more to stay warm this winter, with average seasonal bills reaching approximately $2,300 — a direct result of surging crude oil prices driven by the war in Iran.”

NEADA is urging Congress to raise funding for the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program, known as LIHEAP, from $4 billion to $7 billion. Roughly one in six American households has fallen behind on utility payments, and the total amount owed to energy providers has climbed toward $23 billion, NEADA said.

     They also note that virtually all hydrocarbon fuels are facing price increases this winter, including a projected 8.7% increase for propane, which is produced in the U.S. and thus insulated from the Iran and Ukraine wars.

         Fuel oil is both produced domestically by U.S. refineries and is also imported. Like propane, it is largely produced domestically. However, since the international crude oil price has risen much more than the U.S. natural gas price, propane, which is a natural gas derivative (mostly), has not risen in cost as much as fuel oil distillate. Heating oil is often imported in the winter months to supplement stocks. However, if the El Niño weather pattern proves true, it may not be necessary to import any or much fuel oil.

 

References:

 

Pennsylvania homeowners fear ‘eating or heating’ as oil climbs from $3 to $5.50. Aaron Goldstein. The Cool Down, September 21, 2026. Pennsylvania homeowners fear 'eating or heating' as oil climbs from under $3 to $5.50

Heating oil costs rising 31% this winter due to Iran war. Cris Tolomia. Quartz. September 18, 2026. Heating oil costs rising 31% this winter due to Iran war

Maine Heating Oil Hits $5.77 a Gallon as Collins Pushes for Early Release of Federal Heating Aid. Jon Fetherston. The Maine Wire. September 20, 2026. Maine Heating Oil Hits $5.77 a Gallon as Collins Pushes for Early Release of Federal Heating Aid - The Maine Wire

Heating oil explained: Where our heating oil comes from. EIA. Late updated October 2023. Where our heating oil comes from - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

 

China’s ENN Group Hopes to Produce Electricity Via Hydrogen-Boron Nuclear Fusion by 2030


      China’s ENN Group just broke ground on its ENN Fusion Spherical Ring Hydrogen-Boron Plasma Platform, or Helong-2, from which it hopes to generate its first electricity by 2030. The groundbreaking happened on September 15 at ENN's fusion R&D center in Hebei's Langfang Economic and Technological Development Zone.




     I have not written much about nuclear fusion on this blog mainly because the technology is not ready. I have my doubts about China’s timeline here as well, but the more concrete plans for electricity production in three years are the best I have seen. There are several other interesting fusion projects and pilots happening as well. I will likely write about them if and when they get closer to reality. TAE Technologies in the United States and Marvel Fusion in Germany are companies pursuing hydrogen-boron fusion technology.

     According to The Cool Down:

ENN says the project is meant to create a "world-leading" hydrogen-boron fusion experimental platform built around more than 10 core systems; the Helong-2 complex will span about 120 acres.”

If the schedule holds, experiments would start by the end of 2027 after construction and commissioning are finished, and the site should be ready for equipment installation by the end of June 2027.”

Also called proton-boron fusion, the reaction pairs a hydrogen proton with boron-11 to produce helium nuclei and energy. ENN is targeting 2030 for the project's first electricity from hydrogen-boron fusion.”




     According to World Nuclear News:

Hydrogen-boron fusion is an advanced nuclear fusion reaction that combines a hydrogen proton with a boron-11 nucleus to produce harmless helium nuclei (alpha particles) and energy without releasing high-energy neutrons.”

     ENN maintains a three-step commercialization strategy for hydrogen-boron fusion, beginning with Xuanlong-50 and Xuanlong-50U, its first two hydrogen-boron fusion devices. Step 1 is for Xuanlong-50U to achieve a hydrogen-boron fusion reaction in 2026. Step 2 is finishing Helong-2 in 2027 and producing fusion power by 2030. Step 3 is having a demonstration reactor producing low-cost electricity by 2035.

"Helong-2, as the third-generation fusion device built by ENN, is a key engineering platform for moving towards a fusion smart power plant," said Yu Jianchao, Chairman of ENN Group. "It carries the important mission of breaking through key technologies of hydrogen-boron fusion and exploring new paths for future energy. It is an important milestone in the commercialisation of hydrogen-boron fusion by ENN and an important step on the road to commercialisation of fusion energy in China."

 


References:

 

China breaks ground on Helong-2 fusion platform, set to produce first hydrogen-boron electricity by 2030.Leigh Cook. The Cool Down. September 21, 2026. China breaks ground on Helong-2 fusion platform, set to produce first hydrogen-boron electricity by 2030

China begins building hydrogen-boron fusion device. World Nuclear News. September 16, 2026. China begins building hydrogen-boron fusion device - World Nuclear News

Monday, September 21, 2026

Deep Fission Drills a Test Well in Kansas for Its 15 MWe Deep Subsurface Pressurized Water Nuclear Reactor Design


   

     Company Deep Fission, founded by father and daughter Richard and Liz Muller, thinks they can design a way to produce nuclear power from deeply buried micro-reactors, and they think their method can reduce timelines for nuclear deployment. They are aiming for a deployment timeline of two to three years vs. ten years for conventional nuclear. One reason for this is that safety is more easily ensured underground. The method involves drilling a large-diameter hole, 50 cm (about 10 inches) in diameter, at depth for the reactor. Oil and gas companies typically drill holes this large and larger, but usually for closer-to-surface applications. A hole of this size is required to house the reactor-canister, which is expected to be lowered down into the hole. That is what the company did in a recent test well in Kansas, presumably drilled into Precambrian granite. They drilled the well about 1.8 km (about 5900ft) deep, lowered the canister in and retrieved it.

     Henk Kombrink of GeoExPro recently wrote about the project:

The idea is for the small pressurised water reactor to be placed in a canister, lowered down the hole, which is subsequently filled with water. One reactor is supposed to generate around 15 MWe, which is not that much, and compares to what a prolific geothermal well can produce. But in this case, there is no scaling nor a temperature decline.”

     Below, he illustrates the company’s ambitious hopes for broad and fast deployment:

The company has now started to drill the second well in their campaign, and also announced that they already have signed Letters of Intent with various data centres and other industrial entities for the delivery of a total of 18.5 Gw of generation capacity. That would require more than 1,000 wells, meaning that the technology needs to upscale fast. Since the company aims to use known technology, with the only difference being the new setting, the teething issues may hopefully be limited.”










     A Deep Fission press release from September 10, 2026, gives more detail into the recent test and design principles. The company’s CEO points out that all of the components and contractors for the system are commercially available, which should also accelerate deployment capability.

On Thursday, September 3, 2026, the crew lowered the 20-foot canister to 100 feet depth inside a 34-inch-wide borehole, aligned it, and brought it back to the surface. This is the emplacement and retrieval sequence that Deep Fission's deployment model depends on. The equipment used is available today from commercial drilling contractors.”

     The 34-inch hole is likely a surface casing, where larger diameter holes are required. These are required to protect groundwater drinking sources.

"The most important thing about this demonstration is what we did not have to do," said Liz Muller, CEO and Co-Founder of Deep Fission. "We did not have to develop new technology. We used a rig and rigging that is commercially available in the field today, and our reactor uses pressurized water technology that has been operating in the nuclear industry for decades. Our innovation is in how we put proven pieces together, not in inventing something that has never been built. That is the difference between a science project and something you can deploy."

     The company can bank its 15MW micro-reactors by drilling additional wells for projects, where 10 wells = 150 MW and 100 wells = 1,500 MW. 

     The company also recently published its DOE-approved Nuclear Safety Design Agreement.








References:

 

Drilling a well to produce nuclear energy: How a US company brings together technology from the oil and gas and nuclear sectors to build small nuclear reactors one mile below the ground. Henk Kombrink. September 10, 2026. Drilling a well to produce nuclear energy - GeoExpro

Deep Fission. Website. Advanced nuclear energy deployment :: Deep Fission, Inc. (FISN)

Deep Fission Installs and Retrieves Full-Scale Reactor Canister Using Off-the-Shelf Drilling Equipment. Press Release. September 10, 2026. Deep Fission Installs and Retrieves Full-Scale Reactor Canister Using Off-the-Shelf Drilling Equipment :: Deep Fission, Inc. (FISN)

Deep Fission Publishes DOE-Approved Nuclear Safety Design Agreement for Gravity™ Pilot Reactor, Demonstrating Commitment to Transparency. Press Release. September 15, 2026. Deep Fission Publishes DOE-Approved Nuclear Safety Design Agreement for Gravity™ Pilot Reactor, Demonstrating Commitment to Transparency :: Deep Fission, Inc. (FISN)

Deep Fission Gravity Reactor Nuclear Safety Design Agreement (NSDA) Document ID: RPP-LIC-NSDA-NP Revision: 0. July 17, 2026. RPP-LIC-NSDA-NP+-+Rev+0.pdf

 

Groundwater Flow Pathways Influence Tracer-Based Age Estimates: Different Recharge Characteristics Affect Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) Estimates in Study of Matsumoto Intermountain Basin, Japan


      Groundwater tracers are used to age groundwater, and the age of groundwater is determined by how fast water reaches the aquifer from the recharge areas at the surface. Groundwater flow characteristics can be estimated by knowing the permeability of the rocks through the grain matrix porosity and fracture networks. Chemical tracers offer a more precise way to age groundwater. Knowing the age of groundwater is important for determining the level of natural remediation of contaminants that come from surface water. For example, alluvial aquifers in unconsolidated sand, often found under modern river systems, host younger groundwater since it can flow faster from the surface through unconsolidated sand.

     Types of groundwater tracers include fluorescent dyes, environmental isotopes, radioactive isotopes, chlorofluorocarbons, and sodium hexafluoride (SF₆). Tracer studies are used to identify recharge areas and flow paths, assess contamination risks, and assess recharge characteristics. The two general categories of groundwater tracers are: 1) environmental tracers, which include naturally occurring components such as isotopes and atmospheric gases, and 2) artificial tracers, which are deliberately injected into the subsurface for a specific investigation, such as fluorescent dyes. I have used fluorescent dyes in septic system investigations. Industrial gases such as chlorofluorocarbons and sodium hexafluoride entered the atmosphere in more recent years, but their atmospheric presence allows them to be used as tracers and thus, they are classified as environmental tracers.






     EVS Institute has an informative section on groundwater tracers:

Tracers help quantify groundwater recharge, discharge, flow velocity, and mixing – information that underpins nearly every decision in groundwater management.”

     Dye tracers are often used early in aquifer studies. They are used extensively to determine hydraulic connectivity in karstic carbonate terrains, where groundwater can move fast and far. Oxygen and hydrogen isotopes are typically used to define aquifer recharge areas by comparing groundwater isotopes to rainwater and surface water isotopes. Tritium, a hydrogen isotope, is used to age very young groundwater. These isotopes can be vital for contamination studies. Radioactive isotopes include Carbon-14, which is used to date groundwater that is between 1,000 and 30,000 years old. Other radioactive isotopes are used to date groundwater older than that.

     Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and sulfur hexafluoride (SF₆) are industrial gases that entered the atmosphere from the 1930s and 1950s onward.

CFCs can also trace seepage from rivers, provide early warning of landfill and septic tank leakage, and assess the vulnerability of water supply wells to near-surface contamination. Their usefulness is limited in heavily anaerobic environments where microbial degradation can alter concentrations, which is why they are typically used alongside other tracers.”

     Older groundwater is much less likely to be contaminated since it takes time for surface water to arrive there. Using multiple tracers is often a useful strategy, especially since groundwater may be recharged differently in different recharge areas, mixing older and younger groundwater. Managed aquifer recharge programs utilize tracers in their assessments.

Best practice in hydrogeology is to combine multiple complementary tracers – a short-range dye test to confirm flow paths, tritium to establish whether water is modern or premodern, and radiocarbon or noble gases to resolve deeper age structure. Using multiple residence time tracers is strongly recommended to reduce uncertainty, particularly in complex systems with fractured or dual-porosity aquifers where a single tracer may misrepresent the full age distribution.”

The growing integration of tracer data with numerical groundwater models is also strengthening both disciplines: tracers validate model predictions, and models help interpret tracer signals in complex multi-layered aquifer systems. As water scarcity intensifies globally, the role of groundwater tracers in guiding sustainable management decisions will only become more critical.”

     A 2017 summary on chemical tracers by the U.S.G.S. notes:

Tracers have a wide variety of uses in hydrologic studies: providing quantitative or qualitative estimates of recharge, identifying sources of recharge, providing information on velocities and travel times of water movement, assessing the importance of preferential flow paths, providing information on hydrodynamic dispersion, and providing data for calibration of water flow and solute-transport models (Walker, 1998; Cook and Herczeg, 2000; Scanlon et al., 2002b). Tracers generally are ions, isotopes, or gases that move with water and that can be detected in the atmosphere, in surface waters, and in the subsurface. Heat also is transported by water; therefore, temperatures can be used to trace water movement.”

 

 

Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6)-Based Groundwater Age Estimates Identify Groundwater Flow Pathways in Study of Matsumoto Intermountain Basin, Japan

     A study published in the journal Hydrologic Processes shows that tracer-based age estimates of groundwater in mountainous regions depend on groundwater flow pathways in different recharge areas. Researchers studying the Matsumoto Intermountain Basin in Japan were able to integrate SF6 tracers and isotopic tracers to identify two major groundwater flow pathways. One flow pathway originates from mountain catchments. The water trickles into the aquifer over time. The water was found to be older and more chemically evolved and reduced than the other pathway, which originates in the lowlands with recharge via surface water flowing from the mountains. This water is more oxygenated. 




     According to the abstract:

Intermediate hydrochemical signatures indicate hydraulic connectivity and mixing between these flow systems, reflecting differences in groundwater residence time, flow dynamics and water–rock interaction histories.”

     The authors note that knowing these flow pathways and how they connect will be vital for developing the best aquifer recharge strategies for the basin.





References:

 

Identifying Groundwater Flow Paths in Mountainous Systems Using Environmental Tracers: Insights From the Matsumoto Intermountain Basin, Japan. Shinji Nakaya and Ryogo Takada. Hydrological Processes 40(9), September 2026. Identifying Groundwater Flow Paths in Mountainous... : Hydrological Processes

Chemical tracer methods. U.S. Geological Survey. January 1, 2017. Chemical tracer methods | U.S. Geological Survey

How Groundwater Tracers Reveal Water Movement and Age. EVS Institute. Last updated: December 21, 2025. How Groundwater Tracers Reveal Water Movement and Age • Environmental Studies (EVS) Institute

 

Sunday, September 20, 2026

Siliciclastic vs. Carbonate Systems: Modified Graphic Shows That Relative Sea-Level Fluctuations Control Each, but Carbonate Systems Undergo More Complex Post-Depositional Alteration Processes


      Siliciclastic sedimentation derives from exposed continental regions delivering terrigenous sediment via rivers and deposition along a submerged siliciclastic shelf. This is termed a non-marine or terrigenous siliciclastic system. Sea level fluctuations typically control sedimentation through time. Thus. Relative sea level curves are typically constructed to explain sedimentation in the context of what is known as sequence stratigraphy. High-stand Systems Tract (HST) refers to the maximum high sea level for the period under analysis. Transgressive Systems Tract (TST) refers to a sea level that is transgressive or moving to inundate more shoreline. Low-stand Systems Tract (LST) refers to the sea level minimum where subaerial exposure is the most extensive. Falling Regressive Systems Tract (FRST) refers to a sea level that is falling.

     Carbonate shelves are inundated long enough to develop an accumulation of shell material in an open sea or, in some cases, a freshwater lake. They are exposed when sea level drops and undergo different alteration processes, or diagenetic processes, than siliciclastic shelves. Diagenesis can significantly overprint the original depositional fabric through dolomitization, dissolution, karstification, and cementation. Some diagenetic processes also occur on exposed siliciclastic shelves, but they are more extensive and more complex on carbonate shelves. This has implications for oil & gas exploration, including seismic interpretation. Siliciclastic shelves are generally more predictable, although configurations can be complicated by overlapping channels and delta lobes.

     The following graphic was posted by Ibrahim Nasser, Geoscientist at Capricorn Energy, in a LinkedIn post. It was sourced and modified as noted at the bottom right of the graphic.




 

References:

 

LinkedIn post by Ibrahim Nasser, Geoscientist at Capricorn Energy. August 2026.  (25) Post | Feed | LinkedIn

     I saw a free download for an advance PDF copy of this book, and it looked interesting, so I downloaded it. This is a book about ener...