Blog Archive

Thursday, July 16, 2026

‘Buy, Borrow, Die’ Strategy Works for the Super-Wealthy, Despite Bezos Saying It Isn’t Real


     

     What is the ‘buy, borrow, die’ strategy to optimize wealth? According to an article in Moneywise:

The aptly named “buy, borrow, die” strategy was developed by Professor Edward J. McCaffery in the 1990s to describe how rich people get — and stay — rich by paying less in taxes.”

Buy, borrow, die” is a strategy in which wealthy people accumulate appreciating assets, borrow against them and use the estate to pay off the debt after they die. It works because of how taxes are assessed: Not every financial move is a taxable event.”

Buy a car? Generally, you’ll pay taxes. Earn money? Pay taxes. Sell $62 billion in stocks? That’s a taxable event. But if you borrow money against those stocks — as Elon Musk did to buy Twitter in 2022 — that’s debt, not income and it isn’t taxed.”

In addition to avoiding taxable events, the “buy, borrow, die” strategy also allows whatever assets you borrow against to continue to appreciate, making you even more money. And while you’ll obviously pay interest on the loan, for the uber-wealthy, the math can still work out in their favor.”

     Jeff Bezos has claimed the strategy is not real and not used by the wealthy, despite evidence to the contrary. Elon Musk and Larry Ellison are thought to use the strategy.

The highest income tax bracket, for those earning over $640,601, is 37% (4) but interest rates on loans are typically much lower. In Musk’s case, he would likely have paid capital gains tax had he sold his stocks, which are typically taxed at around 20% (5) — still higher than most interest rates.”

     What irks me about this is that only the wealthy, and specifically the super-wealthy, can and often do benefit from this. The strategy is not available to most investors. The super-wealthy can easily provide collateral for any kind of loan and often provide it in stock. They are already significantly undertaxed, and this strategy allows them to avoid even more taxes. The strategy works best when interest rates are lower since it is interest that is paid instead of taxes. New policies, such as taxing certain loans or loan amounts, could limit the strategy, but no such policies are currently under consideration. The practice also irks me because the world’s wealthiest humans are able to increase their own wealth through this loophole and increase overall wealth inequality, which is already beyond absurd levels. It is effectively a wealth preservation strategy available exclusively to the super-wealthy. 

     Below is a Microsoft CoPilot summary of the practice:




 

References:

 

What is this 'buy, borrow, die' strategy that everyone keeps talking about — and that billionaires like Jeff Bezos deny? Aditi Ganguly. Moneywise. June 10, 2026. What is this 'buy, borrow, die' strategy that everyone keeps talking about — and that billionaires like Jeff Bezos deny?

RMI’s Five Oil & Gas Myths Regarding Methane Emissions: Since Gas Waste Drops When Prices are High, They Say Companies Capture Methane for Profit When it Benefits Them


    This article from the Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI) explains some aspects of methane emissions reductions in the oil & gas sector that are often misunderstood.

Myth 1: In terms of pollution from methane emitted during production, all oil and gas is the same. Some oil & gas fields emit more methane than others. Associated gas from oil wells is often deemed too expensive to produce along with the oil, so it is vented or flared, which results in methane and CO2 emissions, respectively.

Myth 2: Gas leaks are minimal and not too costly. Methane can leak from several different points in oil & gas systems, including valves and controllers, condensate tanks, flanges, poorly maintained flares, and during blowdowns of pressurized compressors. Much more gas can be recovered than is currently recovered due to economics. They estimate Texas is losing $1 billion in annual revenue due to methane leakage.

Myth 3: Gas loss and methane emissions are inevitable and impossible to prevent. They state that gas loss or methane emissions are largely preventable, and the technology exists to capture that gas today. The most interesting section of this article is the graph below that shows how gas flaring and methane venting rise and fall with natural gas prices. When prices are high, more gas is recovered, and when prices are low, more gas is wasted. That clearly suggests that some companies are not doing all they can to minimize methane emissions.




Myth 4: Gas is natural and clean. They are not quite correct here. Gas is indeed natural. It often contains impurities, and some can be toxic, like hydrogen sulfide. Gas often needs to be processed from its field or natural form into a pipeline-quality product. Dry gas is generally clean and requires minimal processing. Thus, they are not quite correct here.

Myth 5: Gas supplies are reliable and prices are certain. This is true, of course. However, some regional gas prices are more predictable than others, and some supplies are more reliable than others. Geopolitical global price shocks have occurred, but some regions are protected by abundant and available low-priced gas and are less affected by global events.



References:

 

Reality Check: Clearing the Air on Methane: Five persistent oil and gas myths, busted. Deborah Gordon, Nathan Kauffman, Colm Quinn, and Laurie Stone. Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI). July 13, 2026. Reality Check: Clearing the Air on Methane - RMI

Pielke Jr. Explains the Continued Retreat from High Carbon Emissions Scenarios


   

     Climate impact scientist Roger Pielke Jr. explains the recent CMIP-7 scenario retirements due to implausibility.  CMIP-7 concluded in April that the RCP8.5, SSP5-8.5, and SSP3-7.0 scenarios were “implausible.” Since these have been included in most or all past climate science, this is big news. So-called ‘business-as-usual’ scenarios will now show much less global warming. How much less?

The table below shows just how large these changes are in gigatons (Gt) of carbon dioxide emitted from the burning of fossil fuels to 2100 — both in terms of the highest cumulative emissions across the scenario set (in the first bullet below) and in terms of the scenarios designated as reference or current policy (second bullet below):




     The Medium scenario is considered to be most likely and in line with current projections. The low-medium scenario is possible with stronger decarbonization efforts. The carbon emissions of the most likely Medium scenario are nearly a third of those projected in the SSP 5-8.5 scenario.




     Pielke Jr. notes:

While MEDIUM is the only scenario framed as “current policy” in the CMIP7 set — at 3C in 2100 — it sits above other “current policy projections,” which you can see in the table below. In addition, the MEDIUM-to-LOW scenario at 2.3C in 2100 is just about at the lower end of the projections that assume that national pledges are met.”


     The temperature ranges given in the different projections that are considered plausible run from 2.2 degrees Celsius to 3.0 deg. C. 




     He also explains that the High scenario should not be treated as a business-as-usual scenario, but one in which policies are adopted that increase emissions.

Thus, the range from MEDIUM-to-LOW to MEDIUM — with medians of 2.3C to 3.0C in 2100 — can serve usefully as the equivalent of a baseline or reference range. The HIGH scenario, at ~3.4C in 2100, is explicitly designed as an exploratory scenario to illustrate a world in which policies are adopted that increase emissions. CMIP7 explains:

Clearly, this scenario is not a “business-as-usual” scenario nor the no-policy reference scenario for the other scenarios.”

This point needs to be emphasized. HIGH is not a baseline or reference scenario and should not be treated as such. I’m sure this warning will be ignored by some.”

     As he shows below, the most likely Medium scenario means that annual global emissions are projected to stabilize as they are currently close to doing, and begin to drop in the 2030s. That dropping is accelerated in the Low-Medium scenario. 





     With the new changes, we should see graphs in future IPCC reports that look much different. He notes that the current and pledged policies range is now below what RCP4.5 was presented as achieving with aggressive policy. Below, he gives his thoughts on the implications of the new scenario plausibility determinations, including some uncomfortable political maneuverability for those who favor more catastrophic scenarios and who want accelerated decarbonization.

 


 


References:

 

The Retreat Continues: Updated again, lower again. CMIP7's highest emissions scenario now has less than half the CO₂ of RCP8.5. Roger Pielke Jr. The Honest Broker. July 15, 2026. The Retreat Continues - by Roger Pielke Jr.

The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project for CMIP7 (ScenarioMIP-CMIP7). Detlef P. Van Vuuren, Brian C. O'Neill, Claudia Tebaldi, Benjamin M. Sanderson, Louise P. Chini, Pierre Friedlingstein, Tomoko Hasegawa, Keywan Riahi, Bala Govindasamy, Nico Bauer, Veronika Eyring, Cheikh M. N. Fall, Katja Frieler, Matthew J. Gidden, Laila K. Gohar, Annika Högner, Andrew D. Jones, Jarmo Kikstra, Andrew King, Reto Knutti, Elmar Kriegler, Peter Lawrence, Chris Lennard, Jason Lowe, Camilla Mathison, Shahbaz Mehmood, Zebedee Nicholls, Luciana F. Prado, Qiang Zhang, Steven K. Rose, Alex C. Ruane, Marit Sandstad, Carl-Friedrich Schleussner, Roland Seferian, Jana Sillmann, Chris Smith, Anna A. Sörensson, Swapna Panickal, Kaoru Tachiiri, Naomi Vaughan, Saritha S. Vishwanathan, Tokuta Yokohata, Marco Zecchetto, and Tilo Ziehn. European Geosciences Union. April 7, 2026. GMD - The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project for CMIP7 (ScenarioMIP-CMIP7)

Cyanide-Free Gold Extraction and Arsenic-Capture: Quebec Chemical Company Pioneers Non-Toxic Gold Extraction and Processing


       A chemical company from Quebec has developed a cyanide-free and generally non-toxic method to extract gold from mineral ores. This could relieve companies from environmental compliance burdens associated with toxic gold extraction and processing. Dundee Sustainable Technologies is offering a patented process they call GlassLock, which safely removes and recovers arsenic from gold ore. The process can replace the current practice of utilizing cyanide leaching to remove arsenic. Both arsenic and cyanide are highly toxic. In the process, arsenic is isolated and turned into inert glass. Andy Corbley of Good News Network explains the GlassLock arsenic removal process, followed by an explanation from the company's website: 

Mixed with common components like silica, recycled glass, and hematite, the arsenic is then vitrified into a stable and insoluble glass product that can be removed and processed far more easily.”






     Below, he explains the CLEVR gold circuit extraction process, followed by an explanation from the company's website:

Dundee’s gold circuit process uses sodium hypochlorite and sodium hypobromite in ambient pressures and room temperature to extract gold from ore at a fraction of the time of the cyanide-in-leach method. Contact time is short, just 2 hours compared to 36 hours, and the process operates in a fully closed loop. All chemicals are recycled within the circuit for reuse.”

     They call the cyanide-free extraction process CLEVR. 





     Neither of the two processes requires tailing ponds, which also reduces environmental risks of rain, flooding, acid mine drainage, and dam breaches.

     Mining companies are testing and using the process, including Freegold Ventures Limited, which is using the GlassLock process on its Golden Summit project in Alaska.

In tests, Freegold used GlassLock to recover 95% of the gold contained in the ore while isolating 98% of the contained arsenic as inert glass, reducing the toxicity from 7% to 0.17%. It also was able to remove the need for cyanide leaching, and the resulting gold concentrate would be direct-to-smelter quality.”

The results of this program were extremely positive and encouraging for Freegold as it advances the project through Pre-Feasibility,” the company wrote in a press release.

     Freegold is testing GlassLock among other oxidation processes, but it looks encouraging. Freegold notes in a press release:

Recent results from the GlassLock Process™ demonstrate an enhanced gold grade in concentrate, with no measurable gold losses during processing, resulting in the production of a saleable, direct-to-smelter concentrate that avoids the use of cyanide while significantly reducing arsenic content. The concentrate would be highly attractive to numerous end users.(Source: PR, December 16th, 2025). Ongoing trade-off studies will determine whether the additional processing and capital investment required for further treatment are warranted, or whether a simpler gravity- and CIL-based flowsheet is more cost-effective despite lower recovery rates.

 

 


References:

 

Quebec Firm Pioneers Cyanide-Free Gold Extraction and Arsenic-Capture to Clean up Mining Industry. Andy Corbley. July 10, 2026. Quebec Firm Pioneers Cyanide-Free Gold Extraction and Arsenic-Capture to Clean up Mining Industry

Dundee Sustainable Technologies. Website. Dundee – Sustainable mineral extraction technologies

Freegold Provides an Update on its 2026 Plans. Freegold Ventures Limited. January 23, 2026. Freegold Provides an Update on its 2026 Plans | Freegold Ventures Limited

Eco Wave Power Promotes Wave Energy and AI-Driven Energy Infrastructure in Coastal Areas


      Company Eco Wave Power recently completed wave energy pilot projects. The company reported its Q1 results in May. The company reported:

Eco Wave Power believes that its proprietary wave energy technology is uniquely positioned to support the emerging energy needs of coastal and nearshore infrastructure, including data centers, by providing a predictable and scalable source of renewable energy.”

In parallel, the Company has initiated discussions with data center developers and infrastructure”partners to explore the integration of wave energy into AI-focused energy solutions.”

     The company was also featured during the keynote presentation delivered by NVIDIA’s CEO, Jensen Huang, at the NVIDIA GTC conference.

     Its pilot project is the EWP-EDF One project at the Port of Jaffa, on the Israeli coast. It continues to provide power for the national grid.

During the quarter, the system demonstrated stable performance and reliability under real sea conditions, including record production levels during peak wave events. The project continues to validate the Company’s technology in real-world environments, including grid integration, durability, and cost efficiency.”

     The project continues to evaluate its wave power for powering data centers. The project includes “the integration of advanced data analytics and AI-driven optimization tools such as the Company’s planned WaveGPT platform.”

     Another pilot project was recently completed in the Port of Los Angeles, California. It validated the feasibility of deploying wave energy systems integrated into existing coastal infrastructure without seabed connections or construction.

     The company is continuing its MW-scale wave energy production project offshore Portugal. The company is developing the first wave energy project offshore Taiwan. The company is also planning a project in India and exploring the feasibility of a project in South Africa.





     The company is developing onshore and nearshore wave power that does not attach to the seabed. While offshore wave energy is higher than nearshore or onshore wave energy, the amount of that energy that is exploitable, especially nearshore, is nearly the same as offshore. In addition, it is more stable, much cheaper, easier to install, easier to insure, and safer against high wave damage. Breakwaters are proving to be ideal locations for nearshore wave power deployments. Breakwaters are permanent structures constructed in a coastal area to protect against tides, currents, waves, and storm surges. The wave power devices can be attached to breakwater structures.

     The graphic below shows the total wave power and the exploitable wave power of offshore, nearshore, and onshore environments.




     Below is a global map of wave power resources.

 




     


References:

 

Eco Wave Power Reports Q1 2026 Results and Advances Positioning in AI-Driven Energy Infrastructure. Eco Wave Poer. May 7, 2026. Eco Wave Power Reports Q1 2026 Results and Advances Positioning in AI-Driven Energy Infrastructure - Eco Wave Power



Wednesday, July 15, 2026

China Announces Synthetic CO2-to-Fuel Breakthrough: It Can Make Synthetic Jet Fuel More Economically Competitive


      Slash Gear reported in May that scientists from the Shanghai Advanced Research Institute (SARI) have created the long-chain hydrocarbons used in jet fuel by combining waste CO2 with water. Hydrocarbon fuels contain carbon and hydrogen, and combusting them releases CO2 and water vapor. A process known as reverse combustion can combine CO2 and water to make long-chain hydrocarbons.

The SARI team's process converts these gases into the hydrocarbons, some of which fall within the molecular weight range that distinguishes jet fuel – namely, C8 to C16, where the number denotes how many carbon atoms are in the chain.”

     Producing hydrocarbons from CO2 and water or other intermediate components has long been achievable. The resultant fuel is known as synthetic fuel and may include intermediate products or other end products, including hydrogen, syngas, and methanol. The bottleneck is doing it efficiently or cost-effectively.

The SARI team's breakthrough came from the catalyst used in the process. Using an iron-based catalyst laced with aluminum and potassium additives, the scientists have created a process that may have overcome these hurdles. We won't get too technical, but the process produces about 454 ml of heavy olefins per gram of catalyst per hour — heavy olefins are a class of long-chain hydrocarbons. Using one particular catalyst "recipe" (FeAlK8 to give it its proper title), the process converted nearly half the incoming CO2 — around 49% — into hydrocarbons.”

The catalyst also allowed the process to be completed at a relatively low temperature (626 degrees Fahrenheit) and at pressures of about 290 PSI.”

     This is lower or comparable to the pressure in the Fischer-Tropsch process that is used to make nitrogen fertilizer from natural gas.

     The fuel in the new process was found to be stable in a test lasting 33.33 days. Slash Gear also notes that the fuel must pass strict certification and safety testing, and compliance with these standards is necessary if it's to be widely used in commercial aviation. They also point out that if the jet fuel derived from reverse combustion is to be sustainable, it should be generated with renewable electricity. The process uses lots of power, and that adds to the costs as well.

    If captured carbon is utilized as the source of CO2, the process can be considered to be an example of carbon utilization, the U in CCUS.

 

 

References:

 

China claims a new breakthrough in alternative fuels: Could it solve global oil problems? Bob Sharp. Slash Gear. May 19, 2026. China claims a new breakthrough in alternative fuels: Could it solve global oil problems?

The UN Failed in Gaza and in Lebanon as UNRWA and UNIFIL Allowed Iranian-Backed Terrorist Sectarian Armies to Proliferate, and the UN’s Extraordinary Anti-Israel Bias



 UNIFIL’s Failure and the Lebanese Government’s Failure

     Lebanon is roughly one-third Sunni Muslim, one-third Shia Muslim, and one-third Christian and Druze. Additionally, the country hosts a large population of refugees, most of whom are Sunni Muslim. Its government is tripartite, like that of Iraq. In Lebanon’s case, the president must be a Maronite Christian, the prime minister a Sunni Muslim, and the speaker of parliament a Shia Muslim. According to a 1913 census, Christians made up 79.44% of the population, Druze made up 11.4% of the population, and Muslims only made up 9.15%. By the 1956 census, Christians dropped to 54.66% of the population, Druze dropped to 6.26%, and Muslim’s rose to 38.09%. By 2023, the estimates were 30.46% Christian, 5.5% Druze, and 64% Muslim. Sunni and Shia Muslims are fairly equally represented. Refugees are majority Sunni Muslims, most from Palestine and Syria. Thus, a country which once had an overwhelming majority of Christians, some Druze, and even fewer Muslims, has become a Muslim-majority population over the past century, with an equal number of Sunnis and Shias. 




     The Shias are concentrated in some urban suburbs as well as in Southern Lebanon, which is of most concern to Israel. Basically, they have been assembling a military buildup on Israel’s border for decades.

     Lebanon has a national army, but it has been eclipsed by the Iran-financed military buildup of the unified Shiite militia that is Hezbollah, which is widely recognized around the world as a terrorist group. This is simply unacceptable and was supposed to be remedied by UNIFIL. UNIFIL failed miserably in that regard as Hezbollah became the world’s largest non-state army, with vast quantities of weapons, including: 

precision-guided munitions (PGMs), which is the first time such lethal weapons have been wielded by a non-state actor. Hezbollah also has hundreds of deadly drones in its arsenal.”

     Hezbollah has rightly been accused of undermining Lebanon’s sovereignty, and they have been doing it for decades.

     The United Nations’ Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) was created in 1978 and accepted a mandate to re-establish Lebanese sovereignty and manage an Israeli withdrawal from Southern Lebanon. Now, nearly 50 years later, the situation is not better, but much worse. UNIFIL clearly failed miserably in its objectives. Danielle Greyman-Kennard writes in the Jerusalem Post:  

UNIFIL was created in 1978 after Israel’s Litani operation against terrorism in southern Lebanon. At the time it was established, UNIFIL’s mission basically was to monitor the Israeli withdrawal and help Lebanon reestablish its authority.”

     Finding vast military at Beauford Castle, an underground site just a few kilometers from Israel’s border, the IDF recently re-captured it again. It was an IDF post during the Israeli operation in the war in 1982. Hezbollah’s tunnel system under the castle included operating rooms and numerous weapons. She writes:

What was found in the tunnels near the castle appears to indicate a large engineering project and a significant investment. Reports also indicate this system of tunnels would have taken many years to complete. The tunnels had to be cut into rock, not dug out from the sand, as in Gaza. This was complex.”

     Regarding the history and what was supposed to happen with UNIFIL’s help, she writes:

The Lebanese state, however, was supposed to be rebuilt after the Taif Agreement in 1989 that ended the civil war. When Israel left southern Lebanon in 2000, chronicled in the 2007 film, the Lebanese government was supposed to return. A key part of Lebanon’s return was supposed to be linked to the UNIFIL deployment in southern Lebanon.”

     UNIFIL had forces from many countries, some Muslim, many not. UNIFIL was supposed to be a major part of the fix, but that did not happen. Hezbollah managed to continue its militantism despite the presence of these UN peacekeepers. In 2024, Hezbollah began attacking Israel daily on October 8, 2023, in response to its operations in Gaza, which were in response to the brutal, unprovoked attack on mainly unarmed Israeli civilians, a day earlier. Once again, UNIFIL was revealed as powerless to stop Hezbollah. UNIFIL had ample opportunity to set up a post at Beaufort Castle, but did not. Why won’t or why can’t Lebanon control its own territory? A common answer is that it wants to avoid a civil war. She concludes:

It isn’t like Hezbollah was running away from UNIFIL and the LAF in some complex cat-and-mouse game. It was blasting tunnels into mountains under a major fortress that everyone knew about. This wasn’t in some hidden swamp somewhere that no one can find on a map.”

The question now is whether Lebanon can finally step up and control its own territory. The Lebanese people have suffered from the failure of UNIFIL and Lebanon to do their jobs. Numerous villages have now been destroyed.”

All the foot-dragging didn’t help the Lebanese; it ruined their lives. There is now an opportunity to avoid entering another cycle that began decades ago in the 1970s.”




     It is great that Israel is having peace talks with the Lebanese government, but Hezbollah is not a party to those talks and openly rejects them.

     Shiite activists in Lebanon who oppose Hezbollah were recently arrested and detained as possible Israeli spies. Fortunately, they were released. This can only happen in a government in which Hezbollah has a significant number of backers, unfortunately. Shiite discontent with Hezbollah is surely needed.

    

UNRWA’s Failure in Gaza and Complicity with Hamas

     The U.N. Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), the U.N. organization for Palestinian refugees, has been found to have been absolutely complicit with Hamas in several ways. Some UNRWA staff were Hamas operatives and participated in the October 7 massacre. Tunnels and military infrastructure were built under UNRWA schools, and teaching material at schools routinely glorified jihadism and terrorism. UNRWA members celebrated the October 7 attack.

     In November 2023, just after the attacks, Fox News reported:

IMPACT-se CEO Marcus Sheff said, "Time and again we have warned that UNRWA staff and school materials have created a breeding ground for terror. Our worst fears have now been tragically realized with the horrific attack on Oct. 7. All governments that fund UNWRA, including the United States, must urgently review and concurrently freeze financial support to UNRWA to help ensure that another generation is not lost to the evils of hatred and incitement."

IMPACT-se wrote that the UNRWA material reflects "years of hate-teaching in these schools." One telling example for IMPACT-se is students study textbooks in UNRWA schools in which the terrorists al-Walid and Izz ad-Din al-Qassam, whose names Hamas used for its military wing, are glorified as "heroes" of jihad in a Grade 5 Arabic reading comprehension exercise titled "Hooray for the Heroes."

     Trump pulled U.S. funding for UNRWA in 2018, but Biden restored it.

Former President Donald Trump pulled the plug on U.S. UNRWA funding in 2018. The Biden administration swiftly restored the money to UNRWA and in July 2022 announced it had given more money to UNRWA than any other organization in the world.”

     Thus, we were funding UNRWA at a high level when the attack occurred. We should not fund education that teaches and glorifies jihadism and terrorism.

"It is statistically probable that the majority of the estimated 3,000 terrorists who committed acts of murder, rape, beheading, and abduction of Israelis on October 7 graduated from UNRWA’s education program and schools, as UNRWA operates the majority of the schools in Gaza," it alleges.”

     One commenter noted that the U.S. does not fund pro-Taliban education or pro-Islamic State education, and it should fund pro-Hamas education.

U.S. officials have increasingly called on U.N. member states to defund UNRWA after decades of concerns about its school materials promoting terror, the presence of Hamas tunnels beneath UNRWA schools and charges that staff members participated in the Hamas terrorist attacks of Oct. 7 against Israel.”

     The UN has done its own investigations and found there was complicity with Hamas in a number of cases, and 108 members were referred for exclusion from working there. More recently, it has been noted that 1500 members of UNRWA are currently under investigation.

     It was noted in 2023:

UNRWA maintains a staff of over 13,000 just in Gaza to serve the territory’s 2.2 million Palestinians. Meanwhile, the UNHCR serves more than nearly 90 million people worldwide with under 19,000 staff members.”

     This is not rocket science. The U.S. or any moral modern country should not pay the salaries of terrorists.

 

The UN’s Extraordinary Bias Against Israel

     The configuration of the UN as a body for all countries, despite the despicable actions of some countries, can allow those “bad actors” to have influence, and this is generally not good for anyone. Those countries, and some other Muslim countries, but also many non-Muslim countries, are responsible for the extraordinary anti-Israel bias of the UN. The UN’s structure allows authoritarian countries to form blocks that can and do affect UN decisions. The actions of China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea are often directed against the U.S. and democracies in general.

     A July 2025 article in Israel Fact Check asks this question of the UN:

Why do 50% of its so-called Human Rights resolutions target one nation?”









     The UN passes more human rights resolutions against Israel than all other countries combined. In fact, since 2015, if one counts all UN resolutions, not just human rights resolutions, Israel has been targeted more than twice that of all other countries combined. This is not something new either. It has been recognized for a long time. According to an article in the Mid East Journal:

In 1998, UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan admitted that the UN behavior gives an impression of bias. “It sometimes seems as if the United Nations serves all the world’s people but one: the Jews,” he stated.

     What did the UN do about the October 7 massacre? It waited until Israel responded, calling for a ceasefire, but failed to condemn the initial attack, nor did it demand the release of the hostages:

On October 27, 2023, the General Assembly (GA) adopted an Arab-drafted resolution that called for a humanitarian ceasefire in Gaza. The resolution committee rejected amendments to condemn the terrorist attacks by Hamas and to demand the immediate release of all hostages held in Gaza.”

     Jonathan Schanzer, director of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, noted the UN’s tepid response to the Hamas attack in a November 2023 article. He pointed out that some UN officials, even Secretary General Guterres, sought to justify the attack, or at least downplay it as the desperate attempt of a long-oppressed people. He points out:

The UN doesn’t recognize Hamas as a terrorist organization. Nor does it recognize Hezbollah either. That means UN resources can be and regularly are provided to members of those terrorist groups.”  

Most UN officials commenting on 10/7 tried to equate Hamas’s butchering of innocent civilians and Israel’s legitimate military response. In doing so, the UN revealed the extent of its failure.”

     I will note that I don’t think there is a problem with criticizing Israel. Its military responses can be heavy-handed, and it often allows more collateral damage and civilian deaths than it should. I disagree with some of its policies regarding settlers in the West Bank. Thus, some of the resolutions against Israel are probably justified. However, most are not. Israel does not seek genocide against Palestinians, but Hamas clearly does seek genocide against Israel. It is its clearly stated goal and the reason for its very existence.

     In conclusion, I give the UN an F for clearly mismanaging and exacerbating the situation in the region. I am in favor of the UN's humanitarian work in general, but not in these cases. 

 

 

References:

 

Hezbollah’s rock-cut tunnels under Beaufort Castle expose decades of UNIFIL failure. Seth J. Frantzman. Jerusalem Post. July 13, 2026. Hezbollah’s rock-cut tunnels under Beaufort Castle expose decades of UNIFIL failure

Trump administration probes UNRWA over alleged employment of 1,500 terrorists. Beth Bailey. Fox News. July 13, 2026. Trump administration probes UNRWA over alleged employment of 1,500 terrorists

UN Anti-Israel Bias: Why do 50% of its so-called Human Rights resolutions target one nation? Updated July 14, 2025. UN Anti-Israel Bias: Why do 50% of its so-called Human Rights resolutions target one nation? - Israel Fact Check

UN Bias Against Israel: Fact or Fiction? Mid East Journal January 7. 2024. UN Bias Against Israel: Fact or Fiction?

United Nations’ Bigotry Towards Israel: UNRWA Anti-Semitism Poisons Palestinian Youth. Foundation for Defense of Democracies. November 8, 2023. United Nations' Bigotry Towards Israel: UNRWA Anti-semitism Poisons Palestinian Youth

Religion in Lebanon. Wikipedia. Religion in Lebanon - Wikipedia

Lebanese activists face judicial persecution in Lebanon after criticizing Hezbollah. Danielle Greyman-Kennard. Jerusalem Post. July 14, 2026. Lebanese activists face judicial persecution in Lebanon after criticizing Hezbollah

Employees at US-funded United Nations agency celebrated Hamas terror massacre: report: 100 Hamas terrorists who attacked Israel likely educated at UNRWA schools in Gaza, per IMPACT-se. Benjamin Weinthal. Fox News. November 7, 2023. Employees at US-funded United Nations agency celebrated Hamas terror massacre: report | Fox News

Mitigating Natural Gas Emissions at Data Centers: RBN Energy’s Housley Carr Explains (Part 1)


     Carr begins by noting the different approaches that can be used to reduce data center natural gas emissions. Data centers require 24/7 power. Natural gas is the most suitable and practical power source. Natural gas power can be supplemented with solar and wind power, intermittent sources that can’t be used on their own due to intermittency and the availability of land for their large footprints. Data center owners can buy and retire environmental credits for low-methane-intensity (low-MI) gas. They can capture and sequester CO2 from the combustion of the gas (I don’t believe many are doing this yet). They could also buy power from nuclear energy plants or deploy small nuclear reactors. But, in the near term, natural gas will power data centers. Thus, the tech companies that own them, who had previously been at the forefront of emissions reduction, are confronted with threats to their previous low-carbon pledges. They are doing as much as they can to mitigate this new emissions growth engine.  

     He notes that buying certified gas has emerged as a necessary way to reduce emissions, although it is upstream emissions that are being reduced. Certified gas has been independently verified by a third-party verification company. Going through the verification process typically involves a company’s investing in projects such as switching out “high-bleed” pneumatic valves and controllers with “low-bleed” or “no-bleed” ones, replacing compressor seals, and expanding leak detection & repair (LDAR) programs. He notes that MiQ is the main certification standard in use.

MiQ, which established the most widely used standards for gas-related MI and has already certified about 30% of U.S. gas production, gives gas with an MI of 0.5 a letter grade of “D” and gives better grades to gas with an MI of 0.2 (“C”), 0.1 (“B”) and 0.05 (“A”). Most of the gas certified by MiQ so far gets an “A.




     I would have thought that more than 30% of U.S. natural gas would have been certified by now. We should double that. The graph shows that 79% of gas is grade A certified. That means that 23.7% of total U.S. natural gas production is grade A certified. It makes me wonder how much of that 23.7% is being pursued by buyers seeking to reduce their emissions. Is there more gas than buyers, or more buyers than gas? In other words, can demand meet supply? It seems likely that at the moment there is enough certified gas to go around, but with increased European imports, which often favor certified gas, and now data centers, I wonder how that will play out in the future.

     He notes that MiQ-certified gas can be bought bundled as physical gas or on the spot market at CG Hub or Xpansiv’s CBL Global Spot Exchange. He notes that Meta recently submitted a Request for Proposal (RFP) for certified gas:

We aim to use our purchasing power to create demand for certified low-methane gas and support responsible methane management across the natural gas supply chain. To advance this goal, we are conducting a targeted RFP to identify interventions that specifically mitigate emissions from upstream natural gas production.”

     That request was for its hyperscale data center being built in New Albany, Ohio, which will source natural gas from the Marcellus and Utica region of Ohio, West Virginia, and Pennsylvania. That region has a much higher percentage of certified gas than the national average, so availability should not be an issue.




     The project began construction in 2020, experienced some delays, but has since been expanded and will require more power. They have contracted Williams Cos., a midstream operator branching out into power production, to build, own, and operate several behind-the-meter (BTM) generation projects for the data center. So far, the two collaborators have announced 1150 MW of these projects along with 376 MW of battery energy storage. The natural gas will be powered by turbines and reciprocating engines. Williams is also expanding its pipeline system in the area, putting in large-diameter trunk lines to ensure supply. He notes that Meta put in a requirement for Williams to source the gas locally.

Meta and other companies that buy MiQ certificates tied to gas that might reasonably make its way to their sites are employing the “regional book & claim” method, under which the certified low-MI gas is required to flow into the same pipeline network that supplies the certificate buyer.”

     Carr notes that a future blog will cover how these companies are planning to add carbon capture and sequestration, renewables, and nuclear.

   

 

References:

 

Flawless – More on How Hyperscalers Mitigate the Impacts of Their Fast-Rising Use of Natural Gas. Housley Carr. RBN Energy. July 13, 2026. Flawless – More on How Hyperscalers Mitigate the Impacts of Their Fast-Rising Use of Natural Gas | RBN Energy

           What is the ‘buy, borrow, die’ strategy to optimize wealth? According to an article in Moneywise: “ The aptly named “buy, ...