It is very well known that wood smoke is toxic,
especially indoors, if it is not properly vented. Wood smoke pollution is in
the form of particulates and toxic gases. PM 2.5 particulates are a major wood
smoke pollutant, associated with asthma attacks, respiratory illnesses,
probable cancer, and other health issues. Other harmful emissions include
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, methane,
benzene, and formaldehyde. The EPA reported in 2016 that about 150 people die
in the U.S. each year due to carbon monoxide poisoning associated with more
than 17.5 million fireplaces, 241,000 hydronic heaters, and 10.1 million wood
stoves nationwide, and that 65% of the wood stoves, or 6.5 million of them, are
older and inefficient. They recommend replacement with EPA-certified stoves.
Benefits of replacing an old wood stove with an
EPA-certified stove:
· saves
money, fuel, time, and resources.
· up to 50
percent more energy efficient.
· uses 1/3
less wood for the same heat.
· cuts
creosote build-up in chimneys that helps reduce the risk of fire.
They also recommend using wood that has been split,
stacked, covered, and stored for more than 6 months. They also note that
chimney smoke, up to 70% of it, can re-enter the home or nearby homes. While
they say stoves should be smoke-free inside the house, they also recommend HEPA
filters, which can decrease any indoor smoke by 60%. There are cases where
neighbors of someone who heats with wood have gotten respiratory diseases from
wood smoke. The notion that since wood smoke is natural, it is also clean and
even carbon-neutral are all wrong. Wood ovens in use at restaurants are another
source of toxic wood smoke. The hipster local solar and shallow
geothermal-powered café that got massive government subsidies also runs a wood
oven, which likely significantly wipes out their pollution and CO2 footprints.
I just noticed my neighbors, who have an extra small house to soon be inhabited
by their son as he attends college, has been outfitted with a wood burner,
judging from the chimney pipe. It is not too close to me and mainly downwind,
so I am not too worried about it. Wood smoke kills. According to a 2022 article
in Undark Magazine:
“…a 2017 study, researchers from Boston and North Carolina
estimated that residential combustion causes 10,000 premature deaths in the US
every year, mainly from woodsmoke.”
Wood stoves are the U.S.'s
third-largest source of particulate matter pollution, after wildfire smoke and
agricultural dust. In the winter in populated areas, the use of wood stoves may
be restricted as they can account for the majority of poor air quality. This is
especially the case in areas where winter weather inversions are common. These
inversions keep the wood smoke in the lower atmosphere where it can be breathed
for a longer period and collect at higher concentrations.
Chimney Fires and House Fires
After we bought a house that was
heated with a stove, fireplace, and an oil furnace in 1998, one of our first
fires resulted in a chimney fire. The previous occupants had been burning pine
wood, which leaves a very high amount of creosote buildup in the chimney. It
had just gotten dark, and I was outside when it seemed the sky had lit up. It
was the chimney on fire. Luckily, my wife was inside and immediately closed the
flue, and the fire went out. After that, we had a chimney sweep come and clean
the chimney. We then decided to sell the wood stove and the oil furnace and
install unvented propane heaters and just have occasional fireplace fires.
According to the EPA:
“The National Fire Protection Association estimates that
in 2011, heating equipment was involved in an estimated 53,600 reported U.S.
home structure fires, with associated losses of 400 civilian deaths, 1,520
civilian injuries, and $893 million in direct property damage. These fires
accounted for 14 percent of all reported home fires.”
The main reason for the fires was a lack of cleaning out
the creosote buildup in chimneys.
Solutions for Cleaning Up Wood Smoke
A recent paper published in the
Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, led by Nordica MacCarty
at Oregon State University, notes that “70% of the pollution emitted from
wood stove flues happens at two points in time: when a stove is first lit, and
when it's reloaded.” In old stoves, heat transfer and combustion are not
optimized.
"They have no catalysts or secondary combustion to
reduce emissions and lower the risk of creosote buildup that can cause chimney
fires."
New methods to reduce wood smoke
pollution include optimizing the amount of air in the mix and the timing of air
input through automated systems. According to Tech Xplore:
“MacCarty's group is developing automated technologies
that inject jets of primary and secondary air into the fire to provide just the
right amount of air and mixing at the right time and place in the fire.
Prototypes are showing about a 95% reduction in particulate matter emissions
compared to older models, she said.
This research can also inform the
development of safer wood-burning cooking stoves, which are used extensively
around the world, especially in poor countries. About 2.7 billion people around
the world depend on wood stoves for cooking. This has led to many respiratory
illnesses, including premature deaths. This affects women and children mostly.
"It's difficult to measure wood stove emissions in
the field, so there has been relatively little in-use performance data
available in the past to guide designs," MacCarty said. "Our study
introduces a new system that makes collecting real-world emissions data more
practical."
Below is a section of the paper’s
abstract:
“Implications: Detailed
time-apportioned PM emissions data identified conditions leading to high
emission rates including startup, large loads, and operation of an uncertified
stove. Provides wood stove designers insights toward optimizing performance of
future stove designs, and policy makers information about the impact of user
and technology on air quality objectives. Demonstrated new equipment for
real-time emissions and fuel consumption monitoring that enables time-resolved
PM and direct fuel mass measurements to yield better design insights for
heating stoves. This method can be used by other researchers to gather much
needed field measurements at a lower cost and complexity than existing methods.”
I think the bottom line is that
while an occasional wood fire is probably OK, when people heat their whole
house with wood all winter, they risk their own health and their neighbor’s
health, even if they have the least-polluting wood stoves. The problem is
exacerbated when there are many people in small areas burning wood for primary
heat. While wood can be a cheaper alternative, it is definitely not safer.
References:
New
technologies help wood-burning stoves burn more efficiently, produce less smoke.
Steve Lundeberg, Oregon State University. Tech Xplore. June 6, 2025. New
technologies help wood-burning stoves burn more efficiently, produce less smoke
Burn
Wise. Wood Smoke Awareness Kit. U.S. EPA. 2014. Microsoft
Word - Burn Wise fast facts_9.24.2014.docx
In-situ
measurements of emissions and fuel loading of non-catalytic cordwood stoves in
rural Oregon. Samuel Bentson, Ryan Thompson, Jaden Berger, Jonah Wald & Nordica
MacCarty. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association. May 2025. In-situ
measurements of emissions and fuel loading of non-catalytic cordwood stoves in
rural Oregon: Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association: Vol 0, No
0 - Get Access
An EPA
fix for pollution-spewing wood stoves is backfiring. Officials are increasingly
treating woodsmoke as a public health and environmental justice issue, despite
opposition. Diana Kruzman / Undark. Popular Science. March 7, 2022. The health
risks of wood stoves and smoke pollution | Popular Science
No comments:
Post a Comment