Blog Archive

Wednesday, June 11, 2025

New York and New England Need Energy from Both Offshore Wind and Natural Gas: Revived Empire Wind Project and Revived Constitution Pipeline and Northeast Supply Enhancement Projects


     Whether or not it amounts to a quid pro quo of offshore wind approval by the Trump administration for natural gas approval by New York Governor Kathy Hochul’s administration, all of these projects are needed to ensure power generation and reliability, and natural gas service reliability for New York and New England.

     According to Hochul’s staff, she had several phone calls with Trump, convincing him to revive the Empire wind project he halted, arguing that 1500 union jobs would be affected. Hochul stated publicly that she will only approve the pipelines if they meet federal and state requirements. According to the Institute for Energy Research, Equinor has already lost well over $200 million due to the delay:

The pause of more than a month was costing Norway-based Equinor up to $50 million per week with 11 ships out at sea and on standby. Equinor’s Chief Executive Officer, Anders Opedal, visited the White House to lobby on behalf of the project.”










     The $5 billion Empire 1 project has a design capacity of 810 MW and is expected to be completed in 2027. Empire Wind re-negotiated a price of $150.15 per MW, triple the cost of natural gas plant generation.







     The Constitution Pipeline was originally proposed in 2013 by Williams Companies and received nearly all of its permits before the state of New York’s environmental agency refused to approve some key water permits. Their argument was that the pipeline could affect wetlands and streams with its water crossings. If approved, the 124-mile pipeline could be constructed in a year or less. It was originally expected to cost $700 million, but legal challenges and delays caused the price tag to increase by 40% to over $1 billion. The pipeline was officially scrapped in 2020. New York State has a ban on fracking. I had worked on several Marcellus vertical well tests and cores in preparation for horizontal drilling back in the early 2010s. The ban was official in early 201,5 but was implicit in the years before that. Pipelining to New York and New England, one of the most abundant and lowest-cost natural gas sources in the world, is practical and just common sense.






     Williams is also reviving its Northeast Supply Enhancement project. This project is a 23-mile underwater pipeline from New Jersey to New York City that would run parallel to its existing Transco pipeline and then connect to it to provide gas for state markets. While radical environmental orgs like Food & Water Watch are vowing to fight these projects again, they will have less ability to do so than before as Congress moves toward permit reform, and if the governor and the Trump administration agree on their importance. Importantly, other New England states would gain needed increased access to natural gas.








S&P Global found in a recent survey that expanding pipelines could reduce natural gas prices in the Northeast by up to 30%. Connecticut Gov. Ned Lamont “wants to bring new energy resources into New England to lower costs for ratepayers and is willing to work with federal and regional partners to achieve this goal,” he said in April in a statement to Barron’s.

     Environmental groups argued that the NESE pipeline was not needed, and Williams scrapped the project in May 2024. Reviving the development of both pipelines is expected to cost about $2 billion.

     The bottom line is that power demand is expected to rise, and to ensure the reliability of power and natural gas service, an all-of-the-above strategy is needed for New York State and New England. Many in the Northeast have been infuriated by New York’s ability to stop pipelines not only for New York state but for other New England states that are landlocked, as any pipelines coming from Marcellus fields in Northeast Pennsylvania would have to go through New York State first.

    

 

 

References:

 

Deal Or No Deal? The Empire 1 Offshore Wind Project Is Moving Ahead, But Hochul Is Denying There Is A Pipeline Quid Pro Quo. Institute for Energy Research. Natural Gas Now. June 10, 2025. Deal Or No Deal? The Empire 1 Offshore Wind Project Is Moving Ahead, But Hochul Is Denying There Is A Pipeline Quid Pro Quo.

Trump Reverses NY Wind Farm Stance in Pipeline Deal With Hochul. Bloomberg. May 20, 2025. Trump Reverses NY Wind Farm Stance in Pipeline Deal With

Williams throws in towel on NESE pipeline project. Suzanne Mattei. Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis. May 14, 2024. Williams throws in towel on NESE pipeline project | IEEFA

Williams to Revive Constitution, NESE Pipelines in Joint Effort with Regulators. Pipeline & Gas Journal. May 29, 2025. Williams to Revive Constitution, NESE Pipelines in Joint Effort with Regulators | Pipeline and Gas Journal

Developer Confirms Revival of Northeast Gas Line Projects Totaling $2B. Debra K. Rubin. Engineering News Record. June 3, 2025. Developer Confirms Revival of Northeast Gas Line Projects Totaling $2B | Engineering News-Record

Empire Wind 1. Empire Wind. Empire Wind 1 - Empire Wind

No comments:

Post a Comment

     The SCORE Consortium is a group of U.S. businesses involved in the domestic extraction of critical minerals and the development of su...

Index of Posts (Linked)