Enverus’s Graham
Bain provided an interesting update last month on NET Power's reconfigured
plans for its CCS-equipped power plants and for downgraded CCS project plans in
general in a LinkedIn post. I am a bit disappointed with NET Power, as I
thought they would have had some plants up and running by now after
considerable hype in the 2020-2025 period. Bain notes that they went from
capture-by-design through pre-combustion capture through burning natural gas
with pure oxygen yielding high-purity carbon for capture, to bolt-on carbon
capture after the plants were built, and finally to no carbon capture at all. Below is a section from an August press release by NET Power.
NET Power’s CEO Danny Rice noted:
“Our commercial strategy is recalibrated around what we
believe today’s power customers are actually prioritizing: speed-to-power,
reliability, and scale. Natural gas power generation, co-located with customer
load and deployable on a fast timeline, is how we expect to meet that demand
today. We continue to believe carbon capture and sequestration will play an
integral role in the future of natural gas power, and our approach preserves
that pathway, adding carbon capture in future phases as customer requirements,
economics, and financing support it.”
Bain summarized the changes at NET
Power:
“The company was built on the Allam-Fetvedt cycle, which
is an argument about concentration. Burn gas in pure oxygen instead of air and
the exhaust comes off as nearly pure CO2.”
“𝗡𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟱:
Project Permian Phase I moves to conventional gas turbines paired with Entropy
post-combustion capture. Oxy-fuel is out, capture stays, and it now costs more.”
“𝗔𝘂𝗴𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲:
capture comes out of Phase I too. NET Power contracts 68 MW of turbines against
a roughly 1 GW site ambition, the FID it had targeted for 2026 goes indefinite,
and cash sits at $310mn against $424mn nine months earlier.”
“Speed first, then reliability, then cost, then carbon.
Sustainability is now at the bottom.”
Apparently, the 45Q incentive is
not enough to ensure profitability at present, or at least in a timely manner.
He also summed up other gas-with-CCS projects tied to AI buildout, with only
about a third with announced CCS plans. In the others, CCS is delayed,
deferred, or could be canceled.
“Across 15 announced North American gas-plus-CCS
projects tied to AI there's about 18.5 GW of capacity and only 6.6 GW with
capture in the announced scope. The rest is CCS-ready, deferred or
offset-backed. Chevron ruled capture out of Project Kilby phase 1 on economics.
Entergy pushed it to a retrofit. Prometheus buys 500 ktpa of removals instead
of capturing at the stack. Three US retreats landed within six days, including
Chevron leaving the Western Regional DAC Hub and Heidelberg Materials pausing
Edmonton.”
Commenters were surprised at NET
Power's pivoting, some saying, like me, that they had higher hopes for faster
deployment, and others stressing that the oxy-fuel combustion part of the power
plants was the key feature, and is now the furthest part from deployment.
References:
NET
Power went from
capture-by-design, to bolt-on capture, to no capture at all. Graham Bain. August 2026. Post
| LinkedIn
Net Power Reports
Second Quarter 2026 Results and Provides Business Update. NET Power. Press
Release. August 13, 2026. Net
Power Reports Second Quarter 2026 Results and Provides Business Update


No comments:
Post a Comment