Friday, May 1, 2026

The U.S. Now Has Three Offshore Wind Projects in Production: Dominion’s Coastal Virginia, Orsted’s Revolution Wind, and Vineyard Wind: House GOP Members Propose Extending Wind Tax Credits Expected to Expire in July 2026


       In March, Dominion Energy’s Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind began generating electricity for the grid just days after Orsted’s Revolution Wind entered into service off the coast of Rhode Island. Days ago, it was announced that the Vineyard Wind project offshore Maine is fully up and running. Vineyard had already been producing electricity and played a key role in assuring winter reliability during the 2026 cold spell. As explained below by Heatmap AM’s by Alexander Kaufman, the stage is now set for Vineyard to produce power at affordable prices for power consumers:

On Monday, Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey announced that Vineyard Wind had activated its electricity contracts with utilities, setting fixed prices for the 800-megawatt project 15 miles south of Martha’s Vineyard and Nantucket over the next 20 years. In a press release, Healey said the power purchase agreements will save Massachusetts ratepayers roughly $1.4 billion in electricity costs throughout these next two decades. “Throughout one of the coldest winters in recent history, Vineyard Wind turbines powered our homes and businesses at a low price and now that price goes even lower with the activation of these contracts,” Healey said in a statement. “Especially as President Trump is taking energy sources off the table and increasing prices with his war in Iran, we should be leaning into more American-made wind power.” Vineyard Wind first began selling power to the market in 2024, but at what The New Bedford Light called “fluctuating and at times higher prices.” As of this week and for the next year, the price will be set at $69.50 per megawatt-hour.

     While the biggest recent wind story seems to be the Trump DOI buying out offshore wind leases if the companies agree to invest in oil & gas projects instead, the U.S. wind industry, both onshore and offshore, continues to grow. The U.S. installed wind capacity is at 159.5 GW, of which 159.3 GW is onshore, with a mere 171 MW of offshore wind capacity online. However, offshore wind capacity is expected to grow to 4.2 GW by the end of the year, which means by the end of the year it will be “on the map” in terms of power generation. Many of us thought that Biden’s push for offshore wind was too ambitious, especially as borrowing costs skyrocketed, affecting project economics and triggering renegotiations of terms. Thus, if the Trump administration’s delays of wind projects and wind lease buyouts don’t expand, they will likely just affect some of the total number of projects. It seems clear that offshore wind may be scaled back, but it won’t be shut down. This is important for the fledgling infrastructure, supply chains, component manufacturing, and equipment buildout of a U.S. offshore wind industry. It needs to be supported, preferably by an unconstrained industry.




     Clean Technica’s Michael Barnard summarizes offshore wind project statuses:

What the Trump administration tried to freeze through political interference, the courts largely refused to let die. Five of the country’s marquee offshore wind projects, Vineyard Wind 1, Revolution Wind, Sunrise Wind, Empire Wind 1, and Dominion Energy’s Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind project, all won preliminary court relief after the late 2025 federal suspension orders, and all remained in construction or forward motion by April 2026. Revolution Wind had already begun delivering power into New England, Vineyard Wind had entered initial operations, and Sunrise, Empire, and CVOW were all still advancing through construction, commissioning, and related offshore works. The point matters beyond the individual projects. Washington succeeded in injecting delay, cost, and uncertainty, but it did not erase the industrial reality that billions had already been committed, steel was already in the water, and state demand for large-scale offshore electricity had not disappeared because a hostile administration wished it so.”

     In partnership with the North America’s Building Trades Unions, four GOP House members introduced a bill to restore tax credits for wind, solar, hydrogen, and other clean energy technologies that were phased out by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. The new bill, the American Energy Dominance Act, would remove the accelerated deadlines. The tax credits are currently set to expire in July 2026. Some have suggested that the bill is unlikely to pass unless or until the Democrats gain more seats in Congress, despite House Republicans sponsoring the bill. In March, Democrats introduced a bill to restore the same tax credits. Since both parties have introduced bills to restore the incentives, I am not sure why analysts are so sure the bills are not likely to succeed without a Democratic controlled Congress, but perhaps that is the case for now. I still think the incentives should be restored, but as a ratepayer, I do not think renewables should be overly supported or accelerated.  

    

 

 

References:

 

Vineyard Wind enters into full service. Heatmap AM. Alexander Kaufman. April 29. 2026.

America’s Wind Market Keeps Building Under Policy Pressure. Michael Barnard. Clean Technica. April 17, 2026. America’s Wind Market Keeps Building Under Policy Pressure - CleanTechnica

House Republicans introduce bill to extend renewables tax credits. Diana DiGangi. Utility Dive. Apri 27, 2026. House Republicans introduce bill to extend renewables tax credits | Utility Dive

The Environmental, Water Quality, Habitat, Flooding, and Climate Impacts of Beaver Dams: New Research Shows They Are a Good Carbon Sink, but What About Methane Emissions?



Some Beaver Facts

     There are two beaver species worldwide, the North American beaver (Caster canadensis) and the Eurasian beaver (Caster fiber). Beavers inhabit all 50 U.S. states but are less common in the Southwest. They also inhabit much of Canada, Northern Mexico, much of Europe, and some of Asia. The North American Beaver is one of North America’s largest rodents. They have specialized teeth, suitable for gnawing down trees with which to build their dams and lodges. They live 5-12 years. They mate for life. Each couple produces a litter of 1-4 kits each year. The young adolescents help with their parents’ following litter, then at two years old, they set out to mate and then build their own family lodge. They are herbivorous. Their flat tails are used as rudders for swimming, to aid them in sitting, and to smack on the water to warn other beavers of potential danger.






     Beavers have been referred to as ecosystem engineers since they literally create wetlands and ponds, which become habitats for other species. Their dams filter water, mitigate drought, and increase the biodiversity of flora and fauna. They use trees, branches, sticks, rocks, vegetation, and mud to build their dams. They also build canals to connect ponds. I am guessing the dam below is from the American West.




     They build two kinds of lodges: bank lodges on stream banks and open-water lodges. An open-water lodge is shown below.




     Beavers are also sometimes considered to be skilled foresters:

Beavers practice what is known as coppicing, which means cutting away some of the woodier sections of plants to allow for new growth of beaver food.”

This is something that conservationists currently do to stimulate new diversity in regions with no natural beaver populations and is absolutely necessary for some species to thrive.”

Robins, blackbirds, chaffinches and tits are examples of coppice species, that thrive in coppiced woodlands.”

     Beavers have been extensively trapped for their pelts, which has led to roughly 10 times fewer of them. However, their numbers are now growing fast. 





Mosquitoes, Flooding, and Loss of Water Downstream: Some Potential Negative Impacts

     One potentially negative impact of beaver dams is that the pooled water can increase the prevalence of mosquitoes. The Northeast Massachusetts Mosquito Control and Wetlands Management District did a study to determine the impact of beaver dams on mosquito populations and determined that they can increase the prevalence of mosquitoes, especially if the beaver lodges are abandoned. This is concerning since mosquitoes transmit diseases to humans, including West Nile Virus.

Beaver impacted waterways were evaluated to determine where and when breeding takes place within the system. In addition, overwintering conditions were evaluated to determine the potential for beaver lodges to act as hibernacula for adult mosquitoes. The results suggested that waterways with abandoned beaver lodges had a greater chance of increased mosquito breeding versus waterways with active beaver lodges.”

     Beavers are thought to mitigate flooding in general. However, some people who live very near beaver dams say they can increase flooding locally. I know of one area in Western West Virginia, in the backwaters of the Little Kanawha River, where they seem to keep the water in check. There is no flooding there. There, they seem to have a mechanism to keep the water flowing as well. This is in a shady area. I took the picture below a few years ago. They have since moved their dams around a little bit. This is in a confined area, very close to human dwellings. 




     The other beaver dams I am familiar with are in Southeastern Ohio. This is in a sunny area with several large dams. I have heard that some of the locals have complained about flooding and mosquitoes. It is said that the ponds behind beaver dams can create localized flooding. There are ways to mitigate it, including diverting water or lowering the dams. I took the picture below.




     A 2025 study published in Communications Earth & Environment had researchers from Stanford and the University of Minnesota examine the effects of beaver reintroductions.

Despite the potential for wetland resilience and restoration, beaver activity can create problems for nearby communities. New dams can temporarily reduce water flows, putting stress on downstream water users already struggling to find sufficient surface water supplies during drought conditions. Unmanaged beaver populations can pose a flooding threat to homes, crops, and infrastructure.”

     The researchers also noted that in places where beavers have become a nuisance by flooding farmers' fields or even roads, they can be moved to other areas where they will not have those negative effects on humans.

Ultimately, the researchers envision dynamic risk maps that policymakers, watershed managers, and ecologists can use to quantitatively evaluate where, when, and how to bring back beavers.”

 

Mostly Beneficial Water Quality Impacts

      A Microsoft CoPilot Search for Beaver Dam effects on water quality yielded the following:

Beavers significantly improve water quality by building dams that slow water flow, trap sediments, and create diverse habitats, which collectively enhance freshwater ecosystems.”

     Water with more sediment filtered out is clearer and cleaner. According to the EPA, we still don’t know the full effects of beavers on water quality.

Because stream ecosystems are complex, it can be difficult to understand how disturbances and changing environmental conditions will impact the ecosystem. Additionally, the impacts of beaver dams may vary widely across biomes because the underlying watershed characteristics are different.”

     Studies have shown that water downstream of beaver dams has less suspended solids and nitrates. However, some pollutants may increase downstream of the dams. The effects on water quality can vary depending on factors like season, temperature, water depth, and water flow rate. Sediments that are trapped and then drop to the bottom may increase pollutants in sediments accumulating at the stream bed bottoms. This can be beneficial for a pollutant like nitrogen since it can buy time for microbes to convert nitrates to nitrogen gas, a process known as denitrification. However, it can also lead to the accumulation of pollutants. Beaver ponds can also help to recharge local groundwater.




     A 2025 study in Communications Earth & Environment assessed the variables that led to the most surface water accumulation due to beaver dams in the Western U.S.  They determined that dam length was the most important variable and that dam length was controlled mostly by hydrologic and geomorphology variables. The paper’s abstract is below.

“…valley geometry alone does not determine dam length, but rather a balance between valley shape, hydrological inputs, and soil conditions.”

 




Beaver Dams Create and Improve Habitats

     The trapped sediment will eventually drop to the bottom and support aquatic plant life, which creates habitat. The dams can also trap some agricultural runoff, which also supports aquatic plants.

     According to the Beaver Trust, beaver dams can significantly increase biodiversity:

Beavers are defined as a keystone species as they create unique, complex freshwater ecosystems which provide opportunities for many insects, amphibians, birds, fish and mammals. Beaver wetlands have been found to be home to 50% more species than wetlands not created by beavers.”

     As noted above, the beavers practice coppicing, which is known to increase forest biodiversity. Beavers are considered to provide many ecosystem services, and habitat creation is one of the most important.

     A 2025 study in the Journal of Animal Ecology suggests that beaver dams improve bat habitats. The study shows that more bats hunt in beaver territories than outside of them. One reason is thought to be that there are more insects for the bats to feed on in beaver areas. One endangered bat thrives in dead trees, and beavers do create more dead trees both through flooding them and chewing them down.

 

Beaver Dams as Carbon Sinks

     A 2026 study published in Communications Earth & Environment assessed the ability of Eurasian beavers to create net carbon sinks. According to Phys.org:

The researchers' findings demonstrate that these beaver-engineered wetlands can store carbon at rates up to 10 times higher than similar systems without beaver activity. Over a 13‑year period, the wetland accumulated an estimated 1,194 metric tons of carbon, equivalent to 10.1 metric tons of CO2 per hectare per year.”




     The researchers found that in some seasons, the beaver-dammed regions were a net carbon source, but when averaged throughout the year, they were a significant sink. This study also found that the increase in methane due to expanding wetlands was a negligible effect. I admit I found that to be surprising.  It could mean that these complexes were not resulting in increases in net new inundation. As noted in the section below, this may differ considerably from other environments, such as Arctic tundra, as well as with changes in new inundation. 

Despite uncertainties, the capacity for sediment burial to offset and exceed gaseous C emissions underscores the role of beavers as natural agents for buffering climate change.”

     The researchers also cautioned that beaver dams are often temporary, which can change carbon sequestration effects. The sequestration effects are also limited to small areas compared to the overall land areas.

Dr. Joshua Larsen, from the University of Birmingham and lead senior author of the study, said, "Our findings show that beavers don't just change landscapes: they fundamentally shift how CO2 moves through them. By slowing water, trapping sediments, and expanding wetlands, they turn streams into powerful carbon sinks. This first-of-its-kind study represents an important opportunity and breakthrough for future nature‑based climate solutions across Europe."

 

Methane Emissions Increase Significantly from Beaver Ponds on Arctic Tundra

      Wetlands emit significant amounts of methane via anaerobic decomposition of newly submerged organic matter. Beaver dams basically submerge previously unsubmerged land or partially submerged land.

     A 2023 paper published in Environmental Research Letters examined beaver ponds in the Arctic tundra in Alaska, where beavers have been expanding. They found that beaver ponds increase the amount of methane emitted.

Comparing beaver ponds to all non-beaver waterbodies (including waterbodies >450 m from beaver-affected water), we found significantly greater CH4 hotspot occurrences around beaver ponds, extending to a distance of 60 m. We found a 51% greater CH4 hotspot occurrence ratio around beaver ponds relative to nearby non-beaver waterbodies.”

     This research suggests that while beaver ponds in temperate regions may not affect methane emissions very much, they do increase methane emissions significantly in Arctic tundra regions.

A study from the boreal forest of Quebec found that beaver ponds were responsible for emitting 18% of the total CH4 flux. The high uncertainty on existing estimates of beaver pond CH4 fluxes is partly due to the difficulty of monitoring CH4 fluxes in-situ or remotely and the challenges of extrapolating spatially and temporally limited samples. Our results indicate that in the Arctic tundra environment, where permafrost predominates, beaver ponds enhance CH4 release.”

 

 

 

References:

 

Beavers can convert stream corridors to persistent carbon sinks. Science X staff. Phys.org. March 18, 2026. Beavers can convert stream corridors to persistent carbon sinks

Beavers can convert stream corridors to persistent carbon sinks. Lukas Hallberg, Annegret Larsen, Natalie Ceperley, Raphael d’Epagnier, Tom F. Brouwers, Bettina Schaefli, Sarah Thurnheer, Josep Barba, Christof Angst, Matthew Dennis & Joshua R. Larsen. Communications Earth & Environment volume 7, Article number: 227 (2026). Beavers can convert stream corridors to persistent carbon sinks | Communications Earth & Environment

North American Beaver. Nevada Department of Wildlife. North American Beaver - Nevada Department of Wildlife

Beaver Factsheet (FAQ). Beaver Trust. December 2020. Fact sheets

Do beaver ponds increase methane emissions along Arctic tundra streams? Jason A Clark, Ken D Tape, Latha Baskaran, Clayton Elder, Charles Miller, Kimberley Miner, Jonathan A O’Donnell, and Benjamin M Jones. Environmental Research Letters. 18 (2023) 075004. July 3, 2023. Do beaver ponds increase methane emissions along Arctic tundra streams?

Factors influencing surface water accumulation in beaver pond complexes across the Western United States. Luwen Wan, Emily Fairfax & Kate Maher. Communications Earth & Environment. volume 6, Article number: 614 (August 11, 2025). Factors influencing surface water accumulation in beaver pond complexes across the Western United States | Communications Earth & Environment

Strategically bringing back beavers could support healthy and climate-resilient watersheds. Madison Pobis. Phys.org. August 11, 2025. Strategically bringing back beavers could support healthy and climate-resilient watersheds

Beaver Facts. Fact Animal. 18 Beautiful Beaver Facts - Fact Animal

Beavers create habitats for bats and support endangered species. Beate Kittl. Phys.org. November 13, 2025. Beavers create habitats for bats and support endangered species

Beaver Impacts on Mosquito Control. Northeast Massachusetts Mosquito Control and Wetlands Management District. Beaver Impacts on Mosquito Control | Northeast Massachusetts Mosquito Control and Wetlands Management District

How Do Beaver Dams Affect Water Quality? U.S. EPA. June 11, 2024. How Do Beaver Dams Affect Water Quality? | US EPA

 

 

         In March, Dominion Energy’s Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind began generating electricity for the grid just days after Orsted’s Rev...