With Trump
considering a diesel export ban, his advisors, including current DOE Secretary
Chris Wright and his former first-term DOE chief Dan Brouliette, have argued
against it. Wright said there will be some restrictions but not a ban on
exports. Commentators have suggested that the effects of an export ban were
uncertain and could actually lead to higher prices rather than the lower prices
desired. With diesel selling for $6.53 per gallon, there is a clear need for
lower prices. Those levels are not sustainable for farmers, truckers, and
others who use diesel extensively. There are no real alternatives for them.
Jason Lindquist and John Auers of
RBN Energy asked whether spare Chinese refinery capacity could help world
markets. They conclude that China could buy and refine more oil into products
like diesel and export more for the global market. However, they note that
China needs diesel too and conjecture that there are some Communist Party
policies that may make it harder to refine and export more.
The graph below shows that diesel
and other oil products are not getting through the Strait of Hormuz. It has
been a trickle, 100M Bbl /day at the trough in April to about 700 M Bbl/day
now, compared to 2025 when well over 3 MM Bbl/day were moving through the
strait. That is about 15-22% of pre-war volumes.
Persian Gulf refineries produce a
lot of oil products, and several of those refineries have been bombed, dropping
output by an estimated 2.5 MMb/d, two-thirds caused by refinery bombing. Less
delivery of crude oil to refineries in Asia from the Middle East and Russia
added to that, amounting to a 5.1 MMb/d cut in global refinery output. That
means, even if they could send more, it won’t really happen until the
refineries are back to partial and then full operation. Refineries have been
bombed in Russia as well, which has taken more oil products off the global
market. Thus, two wars, both conducted for protection against rogue militant
states that do not accord with international laws and do not respect human
rights at all (Russia and Iran). Russian refinery output has dropped
dramatically to about 60% capacity utilization, the lowest in 20 years.
Meanwhile, U.S. refineries are operating at over 95% average capacity
utilization. We are also exporting refinery products as much as possible. They
estimate that distillate exports averaged 1.56 MMb/d, 30% above the five-year
average, in the past quarter. Thus, we can’t really refine or export any more
than we are right now. But China can.
They note that China has
government controls on how much oil is refined and how much oil products are
exported. They explain the details below:
“Crude-import quotas are one measure China uses to
maintain market control. Independent “teapot” refiners generally need
government authorization to import crude, allowing Beijing to influence both
the volume of crude entering the country and which refiners can access it.
State-owned companies such as Sinopec, PetroChina and CNOOC are subject to
fewer of these constraints but remain closely aligned with broader government
priorities, particularly energy security and domestic supply.”
“Refined product exports are another powerful tool.
Beijing allocates export quotas for gasoline, diesel and jet fuel, effectively
determining how much surplus production can be placed into international
markets. When quotas are tight, refiners have less incentive to run at high
rates because their ability to export excess product is constrained. Larger
export allowances can have the opposite effect, allowing refiners to capture
overseas margins and supporting higher utilization.”
As the graph below explains,
Chinese refiners dropped exports to about 400Mb/d due to the Strait of Hormuz
disruption but are back up to normal at about 1 MM b/d since August. They note
that China could double that export output to 2MM b/d, which would increase
capacity utilization from the current 80% to about 85%.
I had wondered when I saw the
article headline whether Trump and Xi talked about this issue a couple of days
ago when they met, and apparently the authors wondered as well. Trump asked
Zelensky to stop bombing Russian refineries but I think he has a right to do
whatever is necessary to thwart a brutal invading enemy.
“China’s refining sector won’t single-handedly solve the
global refined-products squeeze, but it represents one of the few meaningful
potential sources of additional supply available to the market in the short
term. Beijing’s control over crude imports, refinery operations and, most
importantly, export quotas gives it the ability to influence how much product
reaches international buyers. With Middle Eastern and Russian supply still
constrained and U.S. refiners running near full tilt, even a modest increase in
Chinese exports could take some pressure off global balances. The question is
not whether China has the barrels, but whether Beijing decides it wants to
supply them to meet global market needs. With President Trump scheduled for a
state meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping on Thursday in Washington, the
topic certainly could come up. While refined product exports are unlikely to be
a headline Trump-Xi negotiating item, they could be part of a broader
discussion about global fuel availability and energy-market stabilization,
topics of mutual interest to the U.S. and China.”
References:
Help!
– With Refining Capacity to Spare, China Could Help Ease Global Gasoline,
Diesel Crunch. Jason Lindquist and John Auers. RBN Energy. September 23, 2026.
Help!
– With Refining Capacity to Spare, China Could Help Ease Global Gasoline,
Diesel Crunch | RBN Energy


No comments:
Post a Comment