No one wants to
breathe unhealthy, toxic air. Combustion in its various forms is responsible
for particulate matter (PM), which is dangerous to breathe. It does not only
matter how big the source is, but where one is relative to it. Sources of PM
include wildfires, campfires, bonfires, wood-burning fireplaces, coal-fired
power plants, biomass power plants, waste-to-energy power plants, coke plants,
industrial combustion processes, diesel-burning transportation, home heating,
ships, trains, jets, smoking, and many more. Wildfires can be a major and
dominant force. Weather inversions can bring the smoke closer to the ground,
where humans have no choice but to breathe it. This happens very often in
places like California, where a significant portion of it comes from China and
Southeast Asia. California consistently has some of the worst air quality in
the U.S., due in no small part to its susceptibility to these weather or heat
inversions. Thus, poor air quality events from wildfire smoke require two
conditions: fires and a weather inversion to hold the smoke down.
A few years ago, my car
dealer’s repair shop offered a free cabin air filter replacement when Canadian
wildfire smoke was present. That is one way we can protect ourselves. Another
is simply staying indoors when the air quality is bad due to PM. Vulnerable
people might want to wear masks or use home air purifiers. PM pollution can be
dangerous, especially for vulnerable people. I wrote a detailed post on PM pollution last August.
A group of Republican
Senators just penned an angry letter to Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney,
demanding better forest management practices in light of three consecutive
years of cross-border Canadian wildfire smoke events. However, sometimes the
opposite occurs when smoke from U.S. wildfires impedes Canadian air quality.
The letter included the following:
"Our hospitals are once again treating children,
dialysis patients, and older residents for the effects of smoke that did not
originate anywhere near them."
“This is the third consecutive year we have had to write to Canadian officials about a crisis that Canada has the tools to prevent and has chosen not to."
The pic below shows Vancouver in 2020 under a blanket of U.S. wildfire smoke.
I don’t know whether Canada
could manage its forests better to prevent fires or not. Experts have noted
that there are other climate and weather factors that make fire more or less
likely. According to an article in Cleveland.com:
“Canada’s forests have always experienced wildfires as
part of natural ecosystems, but scientists say today’s fires are increasingly
occurring under conditions that allow them to grow larger and burn longer,
according to CBS. Warmer temperatures, reduced snowpack, dry vegetation and
prolonged drought create landscapes where fires can ignite more easily and
become more difficult to contain.”
“Forest management practices, including removing excess
vegetation, conducting controlled burns and creating firebreaks, can help
reduce wildfire risks in certain areas, USA TODAY reported. But experts say
those tools cannot completely prevent large-scale fires, particularly when
weather conditions create extreme fire behavior across millions of acres of
remote forest.”
Canada’s fires in recent
years have broken records. They did not change their forest management
practices that had been sufficient until the more recent fires. Perhaps they
should intensify those efforts, but it’s not likely that will solve the
problem.
“Scientists and wildfire specialists, however, caution
that blaming forest management alone overlooks the broader forces driving
today’s fire seasons. They say a combination of climate change, weather
patterns, forest conditions and human decisions all contribute to the
increasing frequency and intensity of wildfires.”
Ohio Senator Bernie Moreno
said he would introduce legislation to sanction Canada over the wildfire smoke,
and another GOP senator from affected Michigan quipped:
“Unless you want to become the 51st state, learn to
manage your forests.”
I think the proposed sanctions and the rhetoric, including calls to enter Canada and fix the forests for them, are uncalled for, disproportionate, and an insult to our friendly neighbors.
Moreno called for forest
thinning, fuel reduction, prescribed burns, and beefed-up enforcement against
arson. I don’t know how much that would help. Some major fires have been
started by prescribed burns that got out of control. Detection and enforcement
of arson is difficult in any case.
References:
When
American Smoke Choked Canada: Some Republican lawmakers have blamed Canada for
poor air quality in the United States and said poor forest management is to
blame. But Canadians have also inhaled smoke from American wildfires. Ephrat
Livni. New York Times. July 17, 2026. When
American Smoke Choked Canada - The New York Times
GOP
senator to introduce bill to sanction Canada over wildfire smoke. Alexander
Bolton. The Hill. July 16, 2026. GOP
senator to introduce bill to sanction Canada over wildfire smoke
Canada
wildfires are sending smoke across U.S. - but experts say there’s more to the
story. Chris Pugh. Cleveland.com. July 17, 2026. Why
Canada Wildfires Aren’t Only About Forest Management - syracuse.com
Canada
attacked by Republicans over wildfire smoke crossing US border. Tag24 News. July
17, 2026. Canada
attacked by Republicans over wildfire smoke crossing US border


No comments:
Post a Comment