Fly ash, or coal
ash, is a waste product left over after the combustion of coal in power plants.
It is typically stored in very large slurry ponds. In order to get the fly ash
out for use, it needs to be dredged out of those ponds and conditioned for use.
A device is shown below that classifies and thickens the ash. Before use, it
also needs some separation into ideal particle sizes.
The use of fly ash as a proppant component began to be explored in earnest in the 2010s. I remember hearing a talk, I believe in 2014, that mentioned it as a possibility. According to a slide presentation at the Kentucky Oil & Gas Association (KOGA) meeting in 2024, the company Enhanced Solution Services (ESS), formerly Metis, began field trials in 2017 with fly-ash-based proppants. The presentation explores fly ash suitability as a standalone proppant. Some fly ash properties are given below. Particle sizes are up to five times smaller than frac sand. Proppants compress when induced fractures close, which reduces flow. If they crush, that creates finer particles which are much more likely to impede flow. Fly ash has good crush resistance but inadequate compressive strength, which limits its applicability.
The fly ash is first separated into different particle sizes.
The paper touts a hydraulic
fracturing method known as Dar-Stim, which utilizes fly ash as a proppant. It
has been tested for refracs of marginal wells and for stimulating new wells.
About 25% of the tests were on horizontal or deviated wells, so most were on
vertical wells.
Fly ash as a proppant has
sufficient rounding and sphericity, as well as acceptable crush resistance. It
has smooth surfaces and low drag. It has no surface charges. It stays in
suspension, which means its use requires much less pumping horsepower than
pumping frac sand. However, the particles are much smaller than those of
typical frac sand or ceramics.
Dar-Stim has been tested across
multiple formation types. Well production improvement post-frac has been very
good. Most of the tests were in wells with pressure below hydrostatic pressure.
It has a lower carbon footprint,
requires fewer site personnel, uses less water, has much greater flowback
recovery, and does not use polymer gels.
A June 2025 study presented at the
SPE Europe Energy Conference and Exhibition explored Class F fly ash proppants
mixed with volcanic ash. It noted that the lightweight, low-density ash
proppant mix with enhanced buoyancy and compressive strength has some
advantages over sand. They explored different mix designs and binder-to-water
ratios. They concluded that volcanic ash can offer higher strength and better
structural integrity than class F fly ash. However, that compressive strength
is still well below industry standards. Thus, for now, it is confined to
lightweight proppant applications. The abstract is given below.
A January 2025 paper published in
the journal Materials also assessed the compressive strength
of fly ash proppants. The study evaluated these proppants under harsh
environmental conditions, including high temperature, high pressure, acidic,
alkaline, saline, and crude oil environments. Some of these are typical in deep
horizontal wells. The different environmental conditions were found to pose
little to no difference in the compressive strength of the proppants. However,
as the abstract below notes:
“The B20W25 sample demonstrated a compressive strength
of 1181.19 psi (8.1 MPa), which, although resilient, remains below industry
standards.”
Unfortunately, this is far
below the required minimum of 5000 psi for compressive strength. A
typical sand proppant can withstand up to 5800 psi, and a ceramic proppant from
7000 psi to 15,000 psi.
Below is the mix design, the
composite-bound cubic and spherical samples, and the machine used to test
compressive strength. I used a machine like this back in the late 80s when I
worked for a short time as a concrete inspector in the construction and
geotechnical industry. It was fun to smash the concrete cylinders!
While the compressive strength of
fly ash proppants remains far below industry requirements, the use of
additives, different binders, and activators could bring it up to those
standards.
“When further understanding has been developed,
enhancing the fly ash alkaline-activated proppant with additives can be looked
at to reach the industry standard. Other binding and activating
materials/solutions also need to be investigated besides the alkaline
activators. Furthermore, an exploration of varied proppant geometries and
utilization techniques could yield significant enhancements in performance
across multiple applications. In sum, this study lays a robust foundation for
ongoing inquiry and advancement within the realm of proppant technology.”
They suggest testing different
types of fly ash, binders, and activators.
“The first actionable recommendation for future work is
to test different types of fly ashes and binders as well as chemically
analyzing the raw materials and synthesized products to understand further how
a proppant compatible with industry standards can be made from fly ash.
Although this study identified certain mechanical limitations, it provides a
solid foundation for future investigations aimed at optimizing fly ash
proppants. In summary, fly ash holds significant promise as a cost-effective
and sustainable proppant material for hydraulic fracturing applications.”
Superior Energy makes a fly ash
proppant called EcoReach, which they describe below:
“EcoReach™ is a next-gen micro proppant sourced from
coal combustion byproducts. It’s made up of perfectly spherical particles, over
five times smaller than a grain of sand. These microscopic spheres glide
without jamming, staying in suspension longer. They travel farther into the
microfractures that conventional proppants can't reach. And they do so without
damaging the reservoir or the environment, all while cutting operating costs.”
For now, fly ash can only be practically
used alone in wells that don’t require high compressive strength. However, it
can be blended with sand or ceramics, and more experiments with blending and
recipes are likely to be developed as testing continues. As a waste product, it
is cheaper to obtain than mined sand or manufactured ceramic proppants.
References:
Use of
Fly Ash as a Proppant in Fracking of Unconventional Oil & Gas Wells. Thomas
Robl, Anne Oberlink, Robert Jewell, University of Kentucky Center for Applied
Energy and Curtis Wilie, Jim Crenshaw, Enhanced Solutions Services. KOGA Annual
Meeting 6/27/2024. Program Briefing
Developing
Fly Ash Based Proppants and Evaluating Their Load Bearing Capacity for
Hydraulic Fracturing Available to Purchase/ Raz Haydar; Sherif Fakher. Paper
presented at the SPE Europe Energy Conference and Exhibition, Vienna, Austria,
June 2025. Paper Number: SPE-225632-MS. Developing Fly Ash Based Proppants and Evaluating Their Load
Bearing Capacity for Hydraulic Fracturing | SPE Europec featured at EAGE
Conference and Exhibition | OnePetro
Ecoreach.
Smarter Proppant. Stronger Performance. Superior Energy. Wellsite Solutions. EcoReach™ Micro Proppant | Superior
Energy Brands
Investigating
and Evaluating Novel Fly Ash-Based Proppant Compressive Strength Under Various
Environmental Conditions. Raz Haydar and Sherif Fakher. Materials 2025, 18(2),
399; Published: 16 January 2025. Investigating and Evaluating Novel Fly Ash-Based
Proppant Compressive Strength Under Various Environmental Conditions
EcoReach:
Smarter Stimulation for Production Enhancement. Superior Energy. EcoReach_Flyer_02.24.26


















No comments:
Post a Comment