According to a market report by Bluefield Research, U.S. municipal wastewater utilities are facing growing costs for biosolids management. They estimate that US$36.4 billion will be needed over the next decade, nearly double current costs. Biosolids management is being affected by the closing of older incinerators, landfill capacity constraints, and PFAS contamination management. These all make biosolids management more expensive.
“According to a new Insight Report, U.S. Municipal
Biosolids Management: Drivers, Trends, and Forecasts, 2025–2035, total U.S.
municipal biosolids management spending will surge, growing from US$2.5 billion
in 2025 to more than US$4.8 billion annually by 2035.”
Cities, towns, and wastewater
utilities will bear the costs.
According to Smart Water
Magazine:
“…more than 23,900 treatment plants across the country
process wastewater effluent for approximately 267 million people. In doing so,
they generate about 6.3 million dry metric tons of biosolids each year—a
nutrient-rich byproduct that has long been applied to farmland, converted into
fertilizers, incinerated, or sent to landfills.”
Incinerators are closing due
to stricter air quality rules. Community opposition and permitting obstacles
are slowing landfill expansions. Concerns about concentrated PFAS contamination
in biosolids are also slowing land application for fertilizer use.
“Many municipal wastewater utilities, particularly in
urban areas, are finding that their preferred low-cost disposal methods are
increasingly becoming less available or just simply more expensive,” says Pat
Byrne, an analyst at Bluefield Research. “As a result, utilities are investing
in more affordable methods and technologies like drying and dewatering, while
also giving greater consideration of advanced destruction systems.”
Bluefield forecasts that the
Northeast will account for US$13.6 billion, more than one-third of total U.S.
municipal biosolids spending over the next decade. Landfill tipping fees have
been increasing in the Southeast amid continued population growth. This will
drive spending to US$9.8 billion, or 27% of the national total. Land
application remains more accessible across the Midwest and West. However,
logistical challenges and growing local opposition may change that. The graphic
below shows that landfilling will remain the most common method. It also shows
regional differences in strategies expected over the next decade.
“There’s no one-size-fits-all approach,” Byrne notes.
“Utilities are making decisions based on local capacity, alternative costs, and
community sentiment—all key factors in driving regional differences in how
biosolids are managed across the country.”
Some states are banning land
application of biosolids. Maine enacted the first ban in 2022. New monitoring
rules and contaminant thresholds are also being developed. The EPA’s recent
designation of PFOS and PFOA as hazardous substances also presents liabilities
for those who choose land application.
“Rising biosolids hauling costs and limited local
disposal capacity are pushing utilities to invest in dewatering and drying
technologies aimed at reducing biosolids volume and moisture before disposal.”
Other innovations include
advanced destruction and thermal processing systems.
“There’s a growing opportunity for companies that can
help utilities adapt to these shifting market dynamics,” Byrne explains.
“Whether through advanced destruction technologies or improved operational
models, utilities are looking for partners that can deliver sustainable,
cost-effective solutions for biosolids management.”
References:
U.S.
utilities face $4.8 billion biosolids challenge amid rising costs. Bluefield
Research. Smart Water Magazine. 5 December 2025. U.S.
utilities face $4.8 billion biosolids challenge amid rising costs – Smart Water
Magazine

No comments:
Post a Comment