As exemplified by the war between
Russia and Ukraine, the bombing of civilian targets such as power plants is a
war crime. While Ukraine bombs Russia’s energy production facilities that power
and finance its war effort, Russia bombs Ukraine’s power plants to cause pain
to the general population, i.e., civilians. They have bombed hydroelectric
dams, natural gas production, coal plants, and natural gas plants, and many
parts of the electricity grid, such as substations. It is an undignified way to
conduct warfare. Ukraine is to be commended for avoiding similar behavior,
although they come close at times. Russia does not play fair. Neither does
Iran. That does not mean the U.S. should revert to such behavior.
I have read Robert Bryce’s
book, A Question of Power: Electricity and the wealth of Nations,
which details the characteristics and the importance of power grids and access
to electricity. He focused on different power grids in several places, their
strengths and vulnerabilities.
It should also be noted that
power grids of different countries are often connected together. Just this
week, Russia bombed out a power line connecting Ukraine and Moldova, through
which Ukraine exported electricity to Moldova. As a result, Moldova is
currently under a power emergency. I also know that Iran exports a significant
amount of electricity to neighboring Iraq, although Iraq is in the process of
moving away from that arrangement, in part by capturing natural gas at its oil
fields to power natural gas plants. Thus, bombing Iran’s power grid could
affect electricity access in Iraq. Trump has threatened to bomb Iran’s power
plants and has received threats in return to bomb salinization plants in the
Gulf states. Each is threatening war crimes.
In a Substack post, Bryce
gives five reasons why Trump should not bomb Iran’s power plants. The first is
simply that power plants are not considered to be a legitimate military target,
but civilian infrastructure. He also notes that doing so does not advance the
stated war aims of degrading nuclear and ballistic missile capabilities.
Secondly, bombing the power
plants could result in mass civilian death since electricity powers and
supplies necessities like freshwater, wastewater treatment, communications, and
hospitals. This could create a humanitarian disaster.
Third is simply that it
invites tit-for-tat retaliation, which Iran can do with its drones, even if
only 10% are getting through, against similar civilian infrastructure in
targeted countries. Indeed after Trump made the threat, the Iranians proposed
doing just that.
Fourth, he notes, is that if
the power infrastructure is bombed it could lead to the next rulers, friendly
or not, being rendered unable to manage its society. He notes that Iran also
exports electricity to Pakistan and Afghanistan.
Fifth, he cites what the
University of Chicago’s Robert Pape calls the escalation trap, where the
original attacker starts out with escalation dominance but without immediate
success decides to escalate further and consider more risky approaches to achieve
strategic goals.
I don’t always agree with
Bryce but I usually do and in this case I do as well.
References:
Don’t:
Five reasons why Trump should not bomb Iran’s electric grid. Robert Bryce.
Substack. March 22, 2026. Don't.
- Robert Bryce
No comments:
Post a Comment