Blog Archive

Friday, March 27, 2026

Prediction Markets: Should Betting on Events Be Allowed or Encouraged? There are Ethical Concerns and Security Concerns


 

     Prediction markets are a form of betting that involves betting in favor of or against events occurring. When this is applied to things like wars, assassinations, and human injuries and deaths, many ethical questions arise. To bet on such things seems decadent and seems to make light of such heavy events. It seems like a dystopian view of the future where basic human compassion is set aside for selfish personal goals. I can imagine such markets being elevated in some dystopian novel or movie.  

     According to Wikipedia:

Prediction markets, also known as betting markets, information markets, decision markets, idea futures, or event derivatives, are open markets that enable the prediction of specific outcomes using financial incentives (gambling on real world events). They are exchange-traded markets established for trading bets in the outcome of various events.”

     Political betting has been around for a long time. One historical instance is betting on who would become the new pope in 1503, but it goes back way farther than that.



Prediction markets are based on the theory that individuals with financial stakes in an outcome can collectively predict it more accurately than any single expert. Even if participants are not highly informed, the collective wisdom emerges from their shared incentive to avoid financial loss. Eric Zitzewitz, an economics professor at Dartmouth, explains "Financial markets are generally pretty efficient, and the evidence suggests that the same is true of prediction markets. There’s no virtue-signaling in an anonymous market when you’re betting", and that "what you’re seeing with the market is some average of all of those different opinions, weighted by their willingness to put their money where their mouth is."

     Prediction markets essentially forecast future events, something commodities traders also do with futures markets, which makes them similar. One could say that prediction markets are a kind of futures market, usually based on events more so than future prices. As noted by Investopedia, online prediction markets began in 1988 with Iowa Electronic Markets, which predicts the winners of presidential elections.

     Successful prediction of future events can enable business advantages. Utilization of existing available data can be optimized by AI and improve success rates theoretically, so AI-enabled forecasting can improve results. Investopedia explains below how prediction markets are a kind of “crowdsourcing.”

Prediction markets can be thought of as belonging to the more general concept of crowdsourcing. Crowdsourcing is specifically designed to aggregate information on particular topics of interest. The main purpose of prediction markets is eliciting aggregating beliefs over an unknown future outcome. Traders with different beliefs trade on contracts whose payoffs are related to the unknown future outcome; the market prices of the contracts are considered as the aggregated belief.”

     The Investopedia article goes on to explain the different types of prediction markets. Some are very similar to sports betting. Indeed, they are a form of crowdsourced gambling. Gambling has its own addiction concerns. For an understanding of habit, which includes the societal problem of habitual gambling, I would recommend Charles Duhigg’s 2012 book, The Power of Habit: Why We Do What We Do In Life and Business, which details the nature of habit as a form of conditioning that involves the habit loop consisting of cue, routine, and reward.

     Advocates for prediction markets argue that crowdsourced prediction enables better accuracy, which has been borne out by experiment. Crowdsourcing forecasts often perform better than forecasts by single predictors.  One might say prediction markets harness the power of “collective intelligence.”

     An article in Crypto News considers prediction markets to be like a stock market for questions. The article describes two systemic dangers of prediction markets: oracle manipulation and smart contract vulnerabilities. Oracle manipulation involves blockchain oracles being tricked due to false data. They note a 2025 Polymarket case where data was manipulated, then voted on with a payable outcome different from what actually occurred. This outraged others. Smart contract vulnerabilities and liquidity traps refer to the details of the question and how results are interpreted. An example given was bets on an invasion of Venezuela in January. The smart contract apparently did not consider the extraction of Maduro as an invasion, which outraged some who disagreed.




     One of the biggest concerns about prediction markets is insider trading or otherwise leveraging insider information for advantage. Below are examples from the Crypto News article of controversial predictions that have been suspected of being influenced by insider information. One concerning issue is that the anonymity of the online process gives a kind of immunity to being detected, which can lead to more widespread market manipulation. This is due to the decentralization of these markets. With decentralization and anonymity, insiders can bet without detection. (And once again, cryptocurrencies enable manipulation and support, and protect criminal behavior).



Decentralization makes cheating harder to punish because it removes the identity layer. On traditional exchanges, suspicious trades can be investigated and tied to real people who face legal consequences.”

On decentralized prediction markets, trades happen through anonymous crypto wallets, often with no KYC checks. Everyone can see that a wallet made a fortune on a well-timed bet. Proving who controls that wallet is the hard part.”

So far, enforcement agencies have not prosecuted a crypto prediction market insider case. They would need to prove both identity and misuse of confidential information. That bar is high. In practice, it is the honor system, and there is a lot of money on the table.

     Below, they list some red flags that suggest possible market manipulation.




     They get into the psychology of gambling as well, noting that prediction markets can be as addictive or even more addictive than other forms of gambling since the element of skill produces an illusion of control. Prediction is a part of life and an important part of business. As an economic geologist, I had the job of predicting where the best places to drill oil & gas wells would be. To do this, I relied on geological data. If successful, I was rewarded by getting to keep my job or a raise in pay. The article notes that prediction markets can be more addictive because they feel more like conducting research rather than betting. With decentralization and anonymity, insiders can bet.

     With prediction markets, there are also ethical concerns when betting on situations that involve human tragedy, such as wars, assassinations, coups, calamities, and death. The Crypto News article goes on to suggest that desensitization and the gamification of reality can be dangerous. That is why some prediction market platforms are more regulated than others. Below is a list and some examples, followed by a comparison of regulated and unregulated prediction markets.






     Regulations for prediction markets are likely on the horizon. Congress is considering them, as are some states. Businesses are also concerned about prediction markets. Below are some recommendations for public companies from law firm Morrison Foerster.




    An article in MEXC describes the U.S. legislation proposed in January 2026 regarding prediction markets:

On January 10, 2026, a bill titled the Public Integrity in Financial Prediction Markets Act of 2026 was introduced in the House. The measure, sponsored by Representative Ritchie Torres and co-sponsored by a group of Democrats, would prohibit federal elected officials, political appointees, executive-branch employees, and congressional staff from betting on government policy, official actions, or political outcomes in situations where they might possess material non-public information.”

Proponents argue the bill aims to remove perverse incentives and restore public trust in both government and market mechanisms. Critics of existing prediction-market activity assert that without targeted regulation, a small group of well-informed actors could gain unfair advantages or even influence policy for personal profit.”

     After the Iran war predictions on prediction markets, Congressional Democrats are leaning heavily into restricting such markets. Below is some information about how prediction markets are growing quickly and, in some cases, replacing sports betting.




     On March 12, 2026, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission called for public comment ahead of a regulatory proposal that would require government oversight of prediction markets. The public comment period is for six weeks.

     It was recently reported that an Israeli reporter has been subjected to Polymarket blackmail and death threats tied to his Iran War coverage. This is quite concerning.

When an Israeli journalist wrote about an Iranian missile strike, he was deluged with threatening messages from online bettors demanding he alter his reporting. 'It wouldn't surprise me' if there are more Polymarket-related influence attempts on journalism than previously thought, he tells Haaretz.”

     At issue was whether the strike at Beit Shemesh in Israel was from an Iranian missile or from an Israeli interceptor strike on the missile, with the falling debris causing the damage. The terms of the bet were that an interceptor strike would not count as a missile hit. The issue here is also insider trading and market manipulation, and shows another good reason to avoid and regulate prediction markets. It was reported in February that two people, including an IDF reservist, had been charged with using classified information to place bets on Polymarket during the June 2025 war between Israel and Iran. Thus, we see that there is temptation provided by prediction markets for insider trading among those with inside information.

  


References:

 

US Democrats working on bill to rein in prediction markets after Iran bets. Michelle Price. Reuters. March 5, 2026. US Democrats working on bill to rein in prediction markets after Iran bets

Prediction Markets Explained: Types, Uses, and Real-World Examples. Katelyn Peters. Investopedia. Updated January 27, 2026. Reviewed by Robert C. Kelly. Prediction Markets Explained: Types, Uses, and Real-World Examples

Polymarket. Polymarket | The World's Largest Prediction Market™

Kalshi's $2.2 million Iran mess exposes prediction markets' fine-print problem. Jack Newsham, Business Insider. March 5, 2026. Kalshi Amends Rules Amid Khamenei 'Death Market' Controversy - Business Insider

Prediction market. Wikipedia. Prediction market - Wikipedia

Prediction Market Risks (2026): A Guide to Security, Ethics, and Addiction. Crypto Content Editor (SEO). Camila Karam. Fact Checked by Ines S. Tavares. Last updated: February 4, 2026. Crypto News. Prediction Market Risks (2026): A Guide to Security, Ethics, & Legal Issues

Prediction Markets and the Law of Insider Trading: A Practical Guide. Morrison Foerster. March 3, 2026. Prediction Markets and the Law of Insider Trading: A Practical Guide | Morrison Foerster

Prediction Markets Spark Ethics and Regulation Debate.  MEXC Blog. January 12, 2026. Prediction Markets Spark Ethics And Regulation Debate | MEXC

Democratic senator says 'we need to ban' certain prediction markets, but CFTC chairman Selig has other ideas. Daragh Thomas. Benzinga. March 5, 2026. Democratic senator says 'we need to ban' certain prediction markets, but CFTC chairman Selig has other ideas

US commodity regulator kicks off rulemaking for prediction markets. Reuters. March 12, 2026. US commodity regulator kicks off rulemaking for prediction markets

Israeli reporter on Polymarket blackmail and death threats tied to his Iran war coverage. Ben Kroll. Haaretz. March 18, 2026. Israeli reporter on Polymarket blackmail and death threats tied to his Iran war coverage

No comments:

Post a Comment

          A study by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection found that the liquid runoff, or leachate, from Pennsylvania ...