A new
international consortium of scientists and industrial partners, including the
Norwegian University of Science & Technology (NTNU), has created the first
audited account of global CO2 storage via subsurface sequestration in
geological reservoirs. This is the London Register of Subsurface CO2 Storage,
which has released its first annual report. Right now, the website just has
data and graphs, but the full report is expected to be posted in December,
although there is an annual report that can be downloaded from the website. The
report notes that:
“…over 383 million tons of carbon dioxide had been stored
since 1996—the equivalent of 81,044,946 gasoline-powered cars driven for one
year.”
The U. S., China, Brazil,
Australia, and the Middle East have led CO2 sequestration efforts.
"There has been much speculation about CCS over the
last decades—but here we document the actual progress," said Philip
Ringrose, Professor in Energy Transition Geoscience at NTNU, and a member of
the consortium. "Global carbon storage has seen a 17% annual growth rate
since 1996 and by 2023 the storage rate was 45 million tons per annum."
The first major CCS project,
the pioneering Sleipner project by Equinor that began in 1996, is now complete
in its injection phase and is in a monitoring phase. It should perhaps be noted
that Sleipner, along with several other CO2 storage projects, stores excess CO2
that is produced along with natural gas-producing projects, rather than
receiving CO2 from combustion or industrial sources. CCS offers the best means
of decarbonizing industrial sectors that are difficult to decarbonize with
renewables, such as the steel and cement industries.
Although CCS is devalued by
some as an inadequate response to climate change, most scientists, including
those at the IPCC, think it will be essential in reducing emissions. The new
registry gives an official record of CO2 stored geologically. It also shows
that CCS works. It is working and continues to work as a means to decarbonize,
even though these projects are expensive, requiring both high upfront costs and
significant O&M costs. As noted, I do think we should distinguish between
capture and storage of industrial and combustion CO2 from CO2 produced as a
byproduct of natural gas production. The Sleipner project, as well as projects
in Brazil, Wyoming, and other places, are of the latter type.
As noted in the
report and the quote below, the researchers divided the history of
global CO2 sequestration into three phases: the pioneering phase (1996-2007),
the North American expansion (2008-2015), and global
scaling (2016-2023).
1. Pioneering Phase (1996–2007, 3 Projects): Annual
storage amounts were less than 3 million tonnes of CO2 per year, driven by the
Sleipner project in Norway, which began in 1996 at a rate of about 0.8 million
tonnes per year, and the Weyburn-Midale project in Canada, operational from
2000 at a rate of about 1.6 million tonnes per year. China’s Zhongyuan oilfield
began operations in 2006 with a rate of about 0.3 million tonnes per year,
marking an early expansion beyond North America and Europe. The annual average
growth rate of injection during this period was 21.6%, albeit with most of the
growth taking place in the first year.
2. North American Expansion (2008–2015, 18 Projects): New
projects boosted annual amounts to the range of 7–15 million tonnes of CO2 per
year. This corresponds with an annual average growth in injection rate of 6.2 %
over this period. The total injection rate increase was dominated by projects
in North America, and this also brought the prominence of geological storage
combined with oil recovery. The Santos Basin Pre-Salt oilfield in Brazil joined
the - 1 - Zhongyuan project in China in marking the initiation of a broader
international deployment of CO2 storage.
3. Global Scaling (2016–2023, 36 Projects):
Large-scale deployments and new market entrants increased injection rates to
45.2 million tonnes per year with an annual average growth in injection rate of
9.8 % during this period. This phase featured a large increase in project
numbers and a marked global spread, with activity ramping up in China and new
large-scale projects launching in Australia, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi
Arabia, and Qatar. The growing deployment in Asia, the Middle East, and South
America represented an international expansion of industrial scale CO₂ storage.
References:
First complete
record of global underground CO2 storage released. Norwegian University of
Science and Technology. edited by Gaby Clark, reviewed by Robert Egan.
Phys.org. November 17, 2025. First
complete record of global underground CO₂ storage released
The
London Register of Subsurface CO₂ Storage. The
London Register of Subsurface CO2 Storage
The
London Register of Subsurface CO₂ Storage. Annual Report 2025. Imperial. Royal
Academy of Engineering. AnnualReport2025.pdf



No comments:
Post a Comment