Blue carbon habitat
reconstruction by planting seagrasses and mangrove trees is an established way
to increase marine uptake of CO2 and has been incorporated into lots of projects
that generate carbon credits. A new study in Nature Climate Change concludes
that seaweed farming is another method that is competitive with the other blue
carbon methods. Seaweed farming has long been a viable carbon sequestration
method. I first read about it in Tim Flannery’s 2015 book Atmosphere of Hope.
Most seaweed
farming, or kelp farming, occurs in the waters of Southeast Asia. Consumption
of different kinds of seaweed is most common there. According to Wikipedia:
“The largest seaweed-producing countries as of 2022 are
China (58.62%) and Indonesia (28.6%); followed by South Korea (5.09%) and the
Philippines (4.19%). Other notable producers include North Korea (1.6%), Japan
(1.15%), Malaysia (0.53%), Zanzibar (Tanzania, 0.5%), and Chile (0.3%). Seaweed
farming has frequently been developed to improve economic conditions and to
reduce fishing pressure.”
Global production was over 35 million tons in 2019,
according to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). The U.S. produces
about 23,000 tons with most coming from Alaska and Maine waters. In the U.S. farmers
grow various types of seaweed which include dulse, bull kelp, ribbon kelp, and
sugar kelp. They are used in sushi, salsas, sauces, salads, seasonings, and
other food products.
Seaweed is also
cultivated for extracting its polysaccharides, including alginate, agar, and carrageenan, gelatinous substances known as hydrocolloids or phycocolloids.
Hydrocolloids are used as food additives as gelling agents, emulsifying, thickening, and water retention. Like seagrasses and mangroves, seaweed also provides habitat.
Seaweed farming
has both positive and negative impacts but many of the negative impacts can be
easily mitigated. Mangroves may be cut down for stakes, many seaweed farms are
placed atop seagrass meadows, and the removal of eelgrass to plant seaweed has negative
effects on water quality. Seaweed farms may also introduce or aid in the establishment of invasive species. The positive benefits include feeding humans, feeding livestock,
creating biofuels, slowing climate change, and providing crucial habitat for marine life. Seaweed farming has a much lower impact than other aquaculture and land
agriculture. It can also increase biodiversity and decrease ocean acidity. According
to the NOAA, seaweeds pull more greenhouse gas from the water than salt
marshes, eelgrass, and mangroves combined based on biomass. Seaweeds also
consume nitrogen and phosphorous. Thus, constructing seaweed farms near ocean
dead zones can help use up the excess nutrients. The NOAA is working to restore
lost bull kelp areas in Puget Sound.
According to Wikipedia:
“One way for seaweed farming to scale at terrestrial
farming levels is with the use of ROVs, which can install low-cost helical
anchors that can extend seaweed farming into unprotected waters.”
ROVs, or remotely operated underwater vehicles, are submersibles
typically used in the offshore oil & gas industry.
A large team of
international researchers from multiple disciplines worked on the Nature
Climate Change paper. According to
Phys.org:
“The work involved analyzing data collected by operators
of 20 seaweed farms around the world. The researchers note that the farms they
studied ranged in age from 2 to 300 years old and that they ranged in size from
1 to 15,000 hectares.”
The researchers noted that there was more carbon sequestered
below older seaweed farms as would be expected. They also found that the
average amount of carbon buried below all the farms studied was about twice that
of sediment beds located near the farms.
“The researchers suggest that seaweed farming, especially
in places where sediments naturally build up, can sequester carbon at rates
near to those of some coastal environments, such as mangrove forests.”
The U.N. and others have noted that more research is needed on quantifying the effectiveness of seaweed farming and this is a great step in that direction. The abstract of the paper is below:
Abstract
“Seaweed farming has emerged as a potential Blue Carbon
strategy, yet empirical estimates of carbon burial from such farms remain
lacking in the literature. Here, we quantify carbon burial in 20 seaweed farms
distributed globally, ranging from 2 to 300 years in operation and from 1 to 15,000 ha in size. The thickness of
sediment layers and stocks of organic carbon accumulated below the farms
increased with farm age, reaching 140 tC ha−1 for the
oldest farm. Organic carbon burial rates averaged 1.87 ± 0.73 tCO2e ha−1 yr−1 in farm
sediments, twice that in reference sediments. The excess CO2e burial
attributable to the seaweed farms averaged 1.06 ± 0.74 CO2e ha−1 yr−1,
confirming that seaweed farming in depositional environments buries carbon in
the underlying sediments at rates towards the low range of that of Blue Carbon
habitats, but increasing with farm age.”
References:
Seaweed
farms show potential for carbon storage that gets better with age. Bob Yirka.
Phys.org. January 24, 2025. Seaweed farms show potential for
carbon storage that gets better with age
Carbon
burial in sediments below seaweed farms matches that of Blue Carbon habitats. Carlos
M. Duarte, Antonio Delgado-Huertas, Elisa Marti, Beat Gasser, Isidro San
Martin, Alexandra Cousteau, Fritz Neumeyer, Megan Reilly-Cayten, Joshua Boyce,
Tomohiro Kuwae, Masakazu Hori, Toshihiro Miyajima, Nichole N. Price, Suzanne
Arnold, Aurora M. Ricart, Simon Davis, Noumie Surugau, Al-Jeria Abdul, Jiaping
Wu, Xi Xiao, Ik Kyo Chung, Chang Geun Choi, Calvyn F. A. Sondak, Hatim Albasri,
…Pere Masque. Nature Climate Change volume 15, pages180–187 (2025). Carbon burial in
sediments below seaweed farms matches that of Blue Carbon habitats | Nature
Climate Change
Seaweed
farming. Wikipedia. Seaweed
farming - Wikipedia
Seaweed
Aquaculture. NOAA Fisheries. Seaweed
Aquaculture | NOAA Fisheries
No comments:
Post a Comment