In the past, a
higher percentage of the Arctic-Boreal Zones (ABZ) were net carbon sinks than
today. One reason is the increasing wildfires in these regions. The capacity
for carbon storage in the ABZ is less than it was. According to Phys.org:
“An international team led by Woodwell Climate Research
Center found that a third (34%) of the Arctic-boreal zone (ABZ)—the treeless
tundra, boreal forests, and wetlands that make up Earth's northern latitudes—is
now a source of carbon to the atmosphere. That balance sheet is made up of
carbon dioxide (CO2) uptake from plant photosynthesis and CO2 released to the
atmosphere through microbial and plant respiration.”
“When emissions from fire were added, the percentage grew
to 40%.”
The recent research on carbon budgeting in the ABZ is the most comprehensive to date. According to Dr. Anna Virkkala, a research
scientist at the Permafrost Pathways initiative at Woodwell Climate and lead
author of the study:
"While we found many northern ecosystems are still
acting as carbon dioxide sinks, source regions and fires are now canceling out
much of that net uptake and reversing long-standing trends."
Data is collected at carbon flux monitoring towers and
chambers, which track gas exchange between the land and the atmosphere. This
data is integrated with climate, soil, and vegetation data to derive the maps
of inhalations and exhalations of gases, including CO2. The study found that carbon
uptake in the summers has increased over the 30 years of data recording, but
more carbon emissions are being released from the tundra during the non-growing
season months. The high-resolution geospatial data shows the significant
variability of different sections of the ABZ in terms of carbon sink/source
balance. The variability is expected due to the diversity of ecosystems
and climatic conditions across the ABZ. Longer growing seasons and increased
winter microbial activity are driving the changes.
Phys.org notes
that while this study focuses on terrestrial CO2 fluxes, other studies of lakes,
rivers, and wetlands in the ABZ show that natural methane emissions are
increasing.
“But the recent cache of upscaling results tells similar
stories: namely, that trendlines in the northern latitudes are beginning to
turn, and a warmer, greener Arctic does not reliably translate to more carbon
storage there—in part because warmer has meant emissions from permafrost thaw
and greener, more carbon to combust.”
“For example, the study found that while 49% of the ABZ
region experienced "greening"—in which longer growing seasons and
more vegetation means that more carbon can be photosynthesized and stored—only
12% of those greening pixels on the map showed an annual increasing net uptake
of CO2.”
The abstract of the paper is shown below followed by an
explanation of the improvement in data quality and integration across the whole
ABZ.
“Here we address this knowledge gap using an ABZ CO2 flux
dataset that includes monthly terrestrial photosynthesis (gross primary
productivity (GPP)), ecosystem respiration (Reco) and NEE data from 200
terrestrial eddy covariance and flux chamber sites (4,897 site-months). This
dataset is at least four times larger than ones used in earlier upscaling
efforts and covers a longer period, with data extending to 2020. The same
dataset was previously used to analyse in situ CO2 flux trends in permafrost
versus non-permafrost regions, with the conclusion that the annual net uptake
is increasing in the non-permafrost region but not in the permafrost region20.
Here we extend that study from the site level to the full ABZ region by
combining flux observations with meteorological, remote sensing and soil data,
together with random forest models, to estimate CO2 budgets across the ABZ. We
do this upscaling over two periods, 2001–2020 (1-km resolution) and 1990–2016
(8-km resolution); the results in the main text are based on the 1-km models
unless stated otherwise. We then assess regional and seasonal patterns and
trends in ABZ ecosystem CO2 fluxes and their environmental drivers. We also
integrate annual fire emissions from 2002 to 202021 to provide near-complete
terrestrial CO2 budget estimates (referred to as NEE + fire).”
More figures from the paper are shown below.
In my last three
posts, I have shown that new research on carbon cycle analysis and sulfur cycle
analysis is changing future warming predictions. This new knowledge should be incorporated
into regional and global climate modeling to further refine our understanding.
References:
After
millennia as CO₂ sink, more than one-third of Arctic-boreal region is now a
source. Science X staff. Phys.org. January 21, 2025. After millennia as CO₂ sink, more
than one-third of Arctic-boreal region is now a source
Wildfires
offset the increasing but spatially heterogeneous Arctic–boreal CO2 uptake. Anna-Maria
Virkkala, Brendan M. Rogers, Jennifer D. Watts, Kyle A. Arndt, Stefano Potter,
Isabel Wargowsky, Edward A. G. Schuur, Craig R. See, Marguerite Mauritz, Julia
Boike, M. Syndonia Bret-Harte, Eleanor J. Burke, Arden Burrell, Namyi Chae,
Abhishek Chatterjee, Frederic Chevallier, Torben R. Christensen, Roisin
Commane, Han Dolman, Colin W. Edgar, Bo Elberling, Craig A. Emmerton, Eugenie
S. Euskirchen, Liang Feng, …Susan M. Natali. Nature Climate Change (2025). Wildfires offset the increasing but
spatially heterogeneous Arctic–boreal CO2 uptake | Nature Climate Change
No comments:
Post a Comment