Semiconductor
manufacturing and solar manufacturing release powerful greenhouse gases
including perfluorinated compounds (PFCs), sodium hexafluoride (SF6), and nitrogen
trifluoride (NF3). PFCs, SF6, and NF3 are types of fluorinated gases, or
F-gases.
According to
Wikipedia:
Fluorinated gases (F-gases) are a group of gases
containing fluorine. They are divided into several types, the main of those are
hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), sulphur hexafluoride (SF6).
They are used in refrigeration, air conditioning, heat pumps, fire suppression,
electronics, aerospace, magnesium industry, foam and high voltage switchgear.
As they are greenhouse gases with a strong global warming potential, their use
is regulated.
Some F-gases with
lower global warming potential (GWP) are being used to replace hydrofluorocarbons
(HFCs) of higher GWP in refrigeration. HFCs largely replaced chlorofluorocarbons
(CFCs) and hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) that have even higher GWPs.
Abatement
technologies for these emissions are being improved and deployed as more
semiconductor and solar panel manufacturers make emissions reductions commitments.
McKinsey & Company reported in May 2022 that among semiconductor
manufacturers, there were mixed levels of commitments.
In the Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry
Most semiconductor
manufacturing emissions are Scope 2 emissions generated by the energy that
powers the facilities and runs the tools used in them. In several places around
the world, this is mainly coal and other fossil fuels. Thus, recommendations
for improving emissions profiles include obtaining supplies of cleaner energy.
The breakdown of
emissions by Scope is shown below. Process gas emissions are mainly gases with
high GWPs, and most are far above CO2. It is also important to consider their
time in the atmosphere.
McKinsey & Company offers four levers for
reducing process gas emissions in semiconductor manufacturing:
1)
Process improvements. This mainly
involves incorporating emissions reduction into the engineering designs and
operational parameters to optimize emissions reduction alongside cost-savings.
2)
Use of alternative chemistries. This
can be effective but also can be wrought with problems as new processes and
suppliers are integrated. It is also costly and time-consuming: “While fabs
have already implemented some major improvements, such as increased use of NF3,
many other shifts, including the replacement of NF3 with F2 or ozone, are still
nascent”
3)
Gas abatement. This is currently
the best means to reduce emissions in the industry and is expected to remain so
in the near term. There are multiple designs for gas abatement including “point-of-use
(POU) systems for individual production tools, point-of-area (POA) systems, and
central abatement systems.” Costs, effects on other operations, and new
metrics like ‘gas destruction and removal efficiency (DRE) are being compared
for different designs. Other challenges include space constraints, limiting
byproduct gases like Nox and carbon monoxide, and limiting downtime from
installation and maintenance of the abatement systems.
4)
Gas recycling. This final lever could
largely replace gas abatement: “Fabs can capture unutilized process gases
and by-products through various means, such as membrane separation, cryogenic
recovery, adsorption, and desorption. They can then refine them into pure
process gases that can be used again, potentially reducing process-gas
emissions. For this lever to become economically viable, researchers will need
to address major challenges related to the separation of process-gas outflows
and purification.”
McKinsey & Company recommends that
manufacturers develop an abatement cost curve that incorporates near-term and
long-term plans. They recommend that the least expensive measures be
implemented first. See below.
In a November 2022 report McKinsey &
Company gives some emissions reductions pathway scenarios for the industry. Some
are shown below. They also divide Scope 1 emissions into process gases, heat
transfer fluid, and fuel consumption.
They recommend the following near-term
actions:
1)
Process gas. Semiconductor
fabs could feasibly install gas-abatement systems that cover 90 percent of
tools on average. Processing gas chemistry would have to be optimized to lower
GHG usage, such as by replacing nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) and
tetraflouromethane (CF4) with fluorine (F2) gas, which has zero global warming
potential.
2)
Heat transfer fluid (HTF).
At least 70 percent of HTF would need to be replaced with low GWP options.
Semiconductor fabs would also need to reduce chiller leakage.
3)
Fuel consumption. Semiconductor
companies would need to replace the current fuel supply with clean options,
such as hydrogen/biomass.
They recommend better
industry-wide collaboration on emissions reduction along the semiconductor value
chain, including with tool suppliers. They also recommend more research into
gas reuse and recycling and alternative chemistries.
According to a November 2023 report by Boston
Consulting Group (BCG) semiconductor emissions make up about 0.3% of global
emissions. Chips with higher processing power have higher emissions. Demand for
chips continues to increase. The graph below shows BCG’s three pathway
scenarios to reduce emissions.
The table below
by gas abatement service provider BAZM shows GWPs of the different process gases
along with decomposition temperatures which affect emissions. They note that
energy use in semiconductor manufacturing ops declined by 34% from 2001 to 2015.
They note:
“Combustion and Plasma destruction has primarily been
responsible for impressive levels of PFC emission reductions while the
performance and quantity of semiconductors are increasing. The main techniques
for gas abatement include the following, either individually or in combination:”
Combustion, Thermal, Chemical conversion, Plasma, Catalytic, and Water reaction.
Gas abatement
system downtown, reliability, and maintenance have been problematic in the past.
Gas abatement provider consolidation has led to BAZM standardizing the gas
abatement sector. Their offerings for the semiconductor and solar manufacturing
industries include the following
·
The GST Suite of technologies
GAIA - Combustion for high flows
Gallant - Combustion for large substrates, e.g., solar
Durian - Plasma
Dragon - Combustion
SWS & Aqua – Water
·
SDS – Chemical
·
Used & Refurbished
Delatech CDO - Thermal
Vector - Water
Guardian – Combustion
Edwards, Techarmonic, etc.
“These systems can convert the target gases, including
PFC's, from the manufacturing process waste into less-harmful by-products.”
An Atlas gas abatement system brochure-style is shown below.
Orla McCoy,
writing in Ultra Facility notes gives three environmental drivers that
constrain gas abatement. In the first case, the constraint is pushing
semiconductor manufacturers to further reduce emissions with new air emissions
limits. Germany has implemented nee rules on NOx emissions. NOx, or nitrogen
oxides, are emitted in the wafer deposition process as the processes use nitrous
oxide, ammonia and process nitrogen sources (like NF3). These NOx byproducts
are notoriously difficult to abate. They also occur in the solar manufacturing
industry. The second environmental constraint is that gas abatement systems
currently have high water usage and high energy usage rates. The sustained
high temperatures required for gas destruction, where the gases are “cracked”
into less harmful gases, is the main factor in high energy use. Burn/wet
point-of-use gas abatement is very common in the industry. It generates
significant amounts of wastewater, up to half of the total plant wastewater. This
comes from the wet scrubbers used to entrap particulate matter in the systems. Water
is also used to flush the systems and to increase acidic gas pH to prevent
corrosion in abatement system. The third constraint is “The
ever-increasing complexity of the semiconductor manufacturing process affects
gas abatement systems.” The management of gas byproducts. The use of acid
gases leads to higher rates of corrosion in system components, requiring more
water. One remedy is “dosing acidic waste gas inside the abatement system
with alkaline chemicals – such as sodium fluoride or potassium fluoride – is a
standard practice in Europe, but slowly emerging in the US.” Local or
regional factors like water abundance and costs and wastewater disposal costs are
factors in system adoption. Thus, water recycling and reduction of wastewater
volumes are ongoing efforts. An emerging method involves “digitally
connecting the process tool using the gas with the abatement technology. By
doing so, the gas treatment technology can be run at idle modes or different
burner intensities according to the gas and type produced.”
In the Solar Panel Manufacturing Industry
As U.S. solar
manufacturing continues to increase as part of the goal of onshoring some of this
manufacturing aided by the Inflation Reduction Act, there is increased scrutiny
on gas abatement in the industry.
A common gas abatement technique for solar manufacturing is regenerative thermal oxidizers (RTOs). This type of gas abatement system abates volatile organic compounds, or VOCs, which include alcohols, silicones, acetates, hydrochloric acid, and other compounds. Coatings applied to panel cells or wafers to enhance strength and conductivity are what lead to the emissions. Some plants utilize multiple layers of coatings which can complicate gas abatement as different chemicals are combusted. The gas abatement systems must also be leak proof as some of these compounds in high concentrations can be deadly.
According to Anoosheh Oskouian, CEO of Ship & Shore Environmental in a July 2023 article in Solar Builder magazine, the gas abatement systems “capture all of that from a direct source inside. On the outside, we build enclosures around the area to collect VOCs that are in the air.” “The VOCs are sucked through ducts and piping and then destructed in a process of combustion with heat.” Ship & Shore’s VOC abatement process yields water and CO2 while reducing VOC emissions from all VOCs they collect by 98-99%. It is unclear how much VOC emissions they don’t collect.
How much VOCs can be emitted varies by state and country:
“California, which has the most stringent air pollution
rules in the country, is referred to as 10-ton area — 10 tons is the maximum a
facility can send out. So, thinking back to the 98 to 99% VOC destruction —
“basically, that 2% of the overall emissions can go out and they will stay
below the allowable levels,” Oskouian explains. Texas is a surprisingly close
second with between 10-25 tons/year.”
U.S. EPA guidance
allows variable levels of VOC emissions based on population levels relative to emission
locations. The maximum allowed in rural unpopulated areas is 100 tons of VOC
emissions per year. There are IRA incentives for solar manufacturing in general
and also for gas abatement, including VOC abatement. To get incentives emissions
must be reduced by at least 20%. Gas abatement can also lead to less toxic panels
at the end of their lives. Future solar panel recycling facilities will also
have to consider their emissions as heat and chemistry are often used to
recover materials. Oskouian also notes:
“The panels we’ve evaluated in the U.S. have a lot more
alcohol of different types instead of more harmful materials like cyanide or
hydrochloric acid,” she notes. “But if we are also recycling panels that were
made outside the U.S. without our domestic manufacturing regulations in mind,
they may have larger amounts of the more toxic, harmful chemicals.”
This suggests
that U.S. solar panels will have better emissions and overall environmental
mitigation than panels in other areas and imported panels.
A 2010 paper in
Photovoltaics International explored methods, configurations, treatment
combinations of gas abatement, and environmental impacts of VOCs and NOx. Some figures
from the paper are shown below. They note that:
“Such treatments usually comprise central acid scrubbing, NOx scrubbing, Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) removal and several local treatments for dust, silane, and VOCs, while caustic scrubbing is an option for monocrystalline PV cell production.”
The oxidation
systems in use are similar to those used for coal-fired power plants. Among the
graphs below are system layouts, costs comparisons, treatment combinations, system
schematics, and estimation of environmental impacts.
References:
Sustainability
in semiconductor operations: Toward net-zero production. McKinsey &
Company. May 17, 2022. Sustainability at semiconductor fabs
| McKinsey
Keeping
the semiconductor industry on the path to net zero. McKInsey & Company. November
4, 2022. The path to net zero: Semiconductor
sustainability | McKinsey
A Net
Zero Plan for the Semiconductor Industry. Gaurav Tembey, Trey Sexton,
Christopher Richard, Ramiro Palma, and Jan-Hinnerk Mohr. Boston Consulting Group
(BCG). November 7, 2023. A Plan to Reduce Semiconductor
Emissions | BCG
Greenhouse
Abatement in the Semiconductor Industry. BAZM Solutions. Greenhouse Abatement in the
Semiconductor Industry (bazmsolutions.com)
Gas
abatement: environmental drivers and constraints. Adam Stover and Josh McCrory.
Orla McCoy. Ultrafacility. Gas abatement: environmental drivers
and constraints | Insights | UltraFacility (ultrafacilityportal.io)
Gas
abatement for crystalline silicon solar cell production. Martin Schottler &
Susanne Rue & Mariska de Wild-Scholten. Photovoltaics International. August
1, 2010. w10020.pdf (tno.nl)
Atlas
Gas Abatement Systems. Atlas? Gas Abatement Systems -
EDWARDS - PDF Catalogs | Technical Documentation | Brochure
(directindustry.com)
New
pollution: The importance of producing PV with minimal VOCs. Chris Crowell.
Solar Builder Magazine. July 25, 2023. New pollution: The importance of
producing PV with minimal VOCs (solarbuildermag.com)
Fluorinated
gases. Wikipedia. Fluorinated gases -
Wikipedia
No comments:
Post a Comment