Blog Archive

Tuesday, January 20, 2026

The Caterpillar’s Edge: Evolve, Evolve Again, and Thrive in Business. Sid Mohasseb (Rugged Land, 2017): Book Summary and Review


        This was an interesting book, sometimes fun. It is focused on strategy in a business world prone to disruptions and changing conditions. Though perhaps slightly dated now, eight years after it was published, it was certainly cutting-edge then in 2017. Author Sid Mohasseb is an entrepreneur, venture capitalist, investor, and business thought leader. I bought the nice hardback version from the Dollar Tree for $1 around 2018 or 2019. This book is amply peppered with quotes from business, thought, political, military, and other leaders and successful people.

               Part One is entitled Hopes and Fears: Past and Future. The first chapter examines addiction to outmoded ways of seeing and acting. He gives the sobering data that the vast majority of startups don’t find the capital they seek and end up failing. He also notes that companies and CEO tenures don’t last as long as they used to. He gives three reasons for this: 1) more diverse environments which are less predictable, 2) the pace and impact of change have increased due to technological innovation, and 3) better interconnectivity among businesses has great advantages but also risks. These factors should not be ignored. Mohasseb recounts his own experiences and some successes and failures of heading or ignoring these factors.

     Being flexible and accommodating disruption is one of the lessons of the book. Being resistant to change can be hazardous. Resisting change is reinforced by confirmation bias and overconfidence bias. Status quo bias, group thinking bias, and “now” bias may be other factors.

The age-old recipe for success was to gather data, analyze it, hypothesize around insights, choose the best plan, then execute that plan for the ensuing years. Today, this simply will not work. Why? Because set plans are by definition static, and the world in which we live and compete is dynamic, changing constantly. New technology allows for data points to come in from everywhere, all the time.”

     Fixed plans are simply not adaptive enough for dynamic markets and situations, he argues. He talks often about moments of insight he calls “Aha” moments and how certain ways of thinking can foster them.

     He cautions against corporate overconfidence. He emphasizes constant evolving and gives a three-fold formula for evolving: 1) align with uncertainty, 2) appreciate reality, and 3) aspire for more.

     The ability to deal with disruptions is very important, especially at a time when business and digital disruptors were popping up all over.

     Part Two is entitled Not Too Fast: Let’s Get Grounded. He recounts a bit of the history of the study of business strategy, arising from the Stanford Research Institute in the early 1960s, which defined business strategy simply as “a systematic means by which a company can become what it wants to be.” Business strategy was often modeled on military strategy. He mentions the influence of former GE CEO Jack Welch in the 1990s and Harvard Business School’s Michael Porter, who advocated for “competitive advantage.”

     Mohasseb does not mention AI but talks a lot about some of its precursors, like data analytics, digitization, the internet of things (IoT), and Big Data. These things enable faster and better business decisions and lead to insight. These things also lead to bigger and more data, which set the stage for the AI innovations we are seeing today. He does note that the Internet of Things (IoT) would generate massive amounts of new data, which it has and continues to do. From data analysis, we can generate insights (now AI can help with that).

     Mohasseb notes that big investments were being made in data analytics and big data. Cloud computing was taking off at the time as well. Computing and data storage costs were dropping. He notes that bigger and more data do not confer strategic advantages without analyzing that data to inform decision-making. Analytics can and often does lead to optimization. Making equipment more efficient through optimization can save money. This continues to be true. He sees data as simply one ingredient in a recipe for success. It is also, he says, a valuable corporate asset. Analyzing it can lead to insight and optimization. In a historical context, he sees the last hundred years as an age of manufacturing followed by an age of distribution, and predicts an age of obsession with the customer that big data can aid.

Let’s not just “compete on analytics.” Let’s “compete on analytically informed and dynamic strategies.”

     He says the battle over analytics will soon be over when all companies can access the same capabilities and intelligence. He also warns that basic business fundamentals should not be ignored.

The science of strategy is to leverage machines and systems to extract insights from data quickly and understandably. However, real competitive edge has always come from comprehension.”

The artful part of strategy is knowing when to go to war and when not to.”

     This refers to knowing when to make certain decisions and moves.

The secret to success is to effectively combine the art and science of strategy.”

     He talks about augmented intelligence that comes from people partnering with machines. We are seeing quite a lot of this now with AI-enabled systems, including sensor-based Internet of Things applications, which enable the collection of vastly more data.

Man-machine teams and adversaries are the future of business competition.”

      He mentions Stuart Firestein, author of Ignorance: How it Drives Science, who advises cultivating ignorance, or ‘not knowing,’ because it can lead us to insights, innovation, and advantages.

     He mentions Columbia Business School’s Ruta McGrath, whose book, The End of Competitive Advantage, notes that stability can be dangerous in a dynamic competitive environment. She cautions that every advantage is temporary.

     Part Three is entitled Breaking Static: Unleash & Embrace. First, he talks about emergence.

Organizations are complex systems. Companies are emergent. They represent a collection of human beings, processes, and practices – they are alive.”

     He also notes that each is distinct, unique, and always changing.

When a group of people (an organization) collaborates, interacts, communicates, and pursues the same purpose, emergence occurs; a collective change happens, a fresh understanding that leads to new decisions, patterns, or changes in direction.”

Your organization is emerging whether you desire it, acknowledge, or ignore it.”

     Next, he talks about connectivity, consistency, and continuity. Optimized connectivity is an essential prerequisite. This involves getting the correct and full signals about performance, the industry ecosystem, the company’s capabilities, and market dynamics.

Connectivity is critical to discovery – when the signals are broken, effectiveness is compromised.”

     Consistency, he says, is vital for data capture and analysis. He says companies should be consistent in measurement and evaluation.

     Continuity involves paying attention to time, he seems to suggest. The timing of business decisions can make or break a company. Better to coordinate with market signals as much as possible.

     He says that “life is about exchange” and therefore we should be cognizant of the value of things being exchanged, including the perceived value.

A winning strategy aims to balance the value delivered to all stakeholders at all times.”

     He says growth, risk, and efficiency must be grouped, monitored, and balanced. 








     Chapter 6: Gaining the Edge, focuses on how to gain that edge, utilizing the evolving caterpillar metaphor as he does throughout the book. First, he notes that “uncertainty is your ally,” so we must become comfortable with it. He tells cautionary tales about the growth of digital industries like Netflix and Amazon, disrupting and replacing brick-and-mortar ones. These new developments reorganized the strategies of many other companies seeking to avoid undesirable outcomes. He says that it is better to get comfortable with probability than certainty. He also gives examples of where embracing certainty was disastrous and where it paid off to embrace uncertainty. He warns that “hope is not a winning strategy.” Disruption risks show that being able to put out fires is a vital skill. The ability to get a whole team to utilize uncertainty as an ally can be very valuable, he suggests. He says that creating cultures of innovation has been beneficial for many of the tech companies. He emphasizes the importance of the free flow of intelligence within an organization, “unconstrained by functions and turfs.”

     Mohasseb advises to “capture and interrogate reality.” He gives Amazon’s development of cloud computing as an example where this has happened. The first step is to appreciate reality, to understand the performance and capabilities of the company, and the fluctuations in markets. He says to “make it achievable” and that describes execution. He also says, “plan to improvise.” Prioritization and timing are important for improvisation.

     Having reviewed thousands of business plans and working with hundreds of entrepreneurs, he cautions:

Experts may advise, “Have a firm conviction about your strategy and pursue it relentlessly.” I disagree. Convictions can be deadly – the wrong convictions will waste your organization’s energy and resources.”

    Mohasseb recommends cultivating “purposeful curiosity” as a means to attract insight. He says that the most common causes of strategic failure are solving the wrong problem or pursuing the wrong opportunity. However, finding the right problems to solve and the right opportunities requires a process of discovery. That process in turn requires effective observation of realities and uncertainties via the scrutiny of data and signals. He says that advantage is found through data analysis. Just having data or technology is not enough. It needs to be analyzed or developed for use. Finding signals in data is what many scientists and strategists do. These days, AI does it very well, oftentimes better or much better than humans do. AI does not forget and can crunch vast numbers quickly, but its ability to strategize is just beginning with agentic AI. This will improve in the future. Identification of challenges and opportunities is one result of data analysis.

Let data analytics constantly deliver the signals, news, and insights – pointing out both direction and progress.”

     More data is usually good, but too much can lead to confusion, he says. I think AI can mitigate that a bit these days.

     He also points out that we as individuals and groups use analytics all the time. It’s what we refer to as common sense in many cases. Strategies must pass the test of common sense. He also recommends keeping strategies simple.

     The final section is Part Four: Doe or Die … Evolve and Thrive. He first states that measuring the effectiveness of a strategy during its implementation is important.

Positive evolutions are purposeful, intelligent, and planned.”

He says that “friction is the unavoidable side effect of change.” Since change is natural and inevitable, so is friction. Obstacles need to be overcome.

     He recommends cultivating a curious and innovative mindset as a positive habit.

     In the final chapter, he speculates a bit about the effects of AI and our growing dependence on machines. Nine years later, we still don’t know what the full impact will be, and predictions are all over the place. He asks whether AI is any different than previous technologies like knives or fire. He notes that we should continue to build and partner with machines and segment our intelligence. That seems to be happening these days.

Politics and religion may divide us, but data and machines could connect us and make us one world. A world where the boundaries of companies, services, and products are hard to distinguish. A world where constant innovation comes from all corners of the earth. Where only the informed can truly evolve and abundance of data end ensuing insights will make the planet more knowledgeable and innovative.”

     Great book!

 

Monday, January 19, 2026

Trump’s Irrational Push for Greenland Inspires Russian Imperialist Alexander Dugin to Call for Invading the Eastern Former Soviet Republics for the Same ‘Sphere of Influence’ Reasons


     Trump says it’s for psychological reasons that the U.S. must own Greenland. Many of us are skeptical and think that it's bullshit. While Greenland may have some mineral, oil, and gas deposits, these can be developed in the same way they are anywhere. There is oil & gas exploration happening in the onshore Jameson Land Basin with drilling expected in the future. Mineral projects often take decades to develop. The U.S. already has preferential military use of the territory with several bases and the opportunity for more. There is no great rational reason we need to “own” it. Besides, it would be very expensive to buy, and much of what we would be paying for can be done without spending the money to buy it. It is simply irrational.

     Trump and Hegseth have recently evoked the Monroe Doctrine, the idea that we should have control over, or as they like to say, “dominate” the Western Hemisphere, or as some call it, “our” hemisphere. Bernie Sanders argued the same thing when justifying Russia’s concerns with Ukraine just before the invasion and criticizing NATO expansion. He said Russia should be allotted its “sphere of influence” via its own Monroe Doctrine ideas. Our goal for the Western Hemisphere should most definitely be to keep out so-called “bad actors,” rogue governments, international organized crime, and human rights abuses. That is the kind of Monroe Doctrine I can get behind. We have failed to do that with Venezuela, Cuba, and a few other cocaine-producing countries that enable organized crime. Certainly, we should support democracies over authoritarian governments, whether left-wing ones or right-wing ones. However, I don’t think we should just give ourselves control of the hemisphere and say we are entitled to it because we are powerful. We should use our power exclusively to root out crime, corruption, inhumanity, and other abuses, and even more so if it affects us. We don’t need to declare ourselves ‘Lord of the Hemisphere.’

     One reason that is a bad idea is that it leads others to see themselves in a similar vein and justify their own imperialist leanings, particularly Russia. Although Russian hardline ideologue and architect of Putin’s geopolitical worldview, Alexander Dugin, mentions countries like China and India should have their spheres of influence as well, those countries have not invaded other countries for quite a long time and are not seen as doing so in the future, with the possible exception of China making a move for Taiwan.

     The main issue with China is its human rights abuses, along with those of Taiwan. India, in general, is not a bad actor, although it has reaped too many benefits from evading international sanctions against Russia, and there have been some human rights issues in Kashmir. India's neutrality doctrine that keeps it more friendly with Russia than we would like is irritating. Russia, on the other hand, is now widely established, or perhaps re-established, as a bad actor. The initiation of the Ukraine invasion in 2014 and its full invasion. Along with its reversion to totalitarianism and mass human rights abuses, abundant war crimes and crimes against humanity have firmly re-established Russia as a bad actor in the most extreme sense. It has also re-established itself as a rogue country, sanctioned and reviled on the international stage. During the Cold War years, it was thought that Russia had reformed to be an upstanding member of the international community. That was a ruse and a lie as the country’s leaders had no intention of keeping things that way, even if it was to their and their people’s vast benefit. The Kremlin rules a sinister government, not to be trusted, not to join with its business ventures, or basic international agreements. I don’t know what to make of Trump’s recent invitation for Russia to be a part of his Gaza Peace Board. In my opinion, they do not need to be invited to anything except peace talks for Ukraine, and if a peace deal is ever reached, it should not benefit Russia aside from keeping its soldiers from being slaughtered by its own brutal and inhumane military tactics.

     In Greenland, there may be deals to be made, including a deal that benefits the U.S. and expands its military presence in the region. Trump has acknowledged that NATO would benefit from that, and likely Greenland and Denmark would as well. NATO obviously does not want expanded Russian influence in that region, and neither do the other parties. In general, the same goes for China.

     Dugin is an imperialist, considered right-wing, who has argued for a pan-Slavic empire in Eurasia, which favors the glory of Mother Russia and hegemony over its perceived sphere of influence. The breakup of the Soviet Union benefited the whole world, and its re-expansion in any form as the Russian Federation would do the exact opposite.




     Specifically. Dugin has openly argued for the invasion of seven former Soviet Republics in the Eastern Hemisphere: Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Kyrgyzstan. This should never be allowed to happen. He wants Putin to formally declare a ‘Eurasian Monroe Doctrine’ to justify future invasions of these countries and likely others, oddly citing Trump’s quest for Greenland and a new Trumpian world order.

Russia is obliged to do something horrible to restore her credibility," Dugin wrote on X.

"It is very sad that we have to use such kind of arguments. But we have [no] choice. Only brutality, force, mass destruction and cruelty matter in Trumplike world."

     Of course, what he says is both untrue and disgusting.

"In this situation, we have no choice but to declare Russia an empire [and] toss aside international law. Now all that remains is to acknowledge [the new reality] and begin to act-well, I would say, like Trump, because we have no other choice.

"So, he says, 'This is my territory, it will be American'. And we say, 'This is our territory; it will be Russian, Eurasian'. He says, 'We are asserting dominance in the Western Hemisphere'. We should say, 'And we, along with China and India, for example, declare our dominance over the Eastern Hemisphere'.

"So the West is for the Westerners, and the East is for the Easterners. And that's it."

     No, that’s not it. Any Russian expansion would be absolutely horrible for those swallowed up, including the general population; very few, if any, would benefit from becoming Russian. The occupied regions of Ukraine have not been made better under Russian control. That is for certain.

     Dugin sees a world with three poles: the U.S., China, and Russia. The U.S. and China are both powerful militarily and economically. Russia only has military power, and much of that has been revealed to be not so great. Its economy is small by comparison. Its only friends are other rogue countries like Iran and North Korea. Its human rights abuses suggest that its expansion should be stopped at any cost, and no human in their right-mind should hope to benefit under such tyranny. Dugin has even suggested that nuclear weapons could be used in Russia’s imperialist expansion. That would be a tragedy for humanity, or rather an expansion of the tragedy for humanity that Russia has already become. For Navalny and the rest of the oppressed, I will address Dugin by quoting Trump (in another context): “Fuck you!”

 

 

References:

 

Russia told to 'toss aside international law' and claim new lands in chilling expansion. Will Stewart and John O'Sullivan. The Daily Express. January 19, 2026. Russia told to 'toss aside international law' and claim new lands in chilling expansion

 

Fleet Space’s AI-Enabled Satellite-Based Agile Mineral Exploration Geoscience: Q2 Metals’ Cisco Lithium Project in Quebec, Canada, is One Example Where Exploration is Being Speeded Up


     Satellite company Fleet Space Technologies calls its Exosphere AI-enabled platform “the space-powered future of integrated geoscience.” The company has been utilized in the discovery and high grading of Q2 Metals’ Cisco Lithium Project in Quebec, Canada. An article in Slash Gear describes the Exosphere platform as “a geophysical sensing system that performs multi-layer analysis of the surface.” The system integrates gravity, aeromagnetic, electrical, geological, and seismic data for 3D subsurface imaging and modeling that can zoom in on prospective areas. It utilizes predictive AI. The main goal is to identify the best places to drill test holes for verification.




     Satellite AI technology can speed up the discovery and high-grading process for mineral mining. In the past few decades, slower mineral discovery rates have been a matter of concern as ore grades have declined. 








     Fleet Space’s white paper focuses on making minerals geoscience more agile.

Agile methodologies reversed this, promoting short iterations and continuous improvement. Mining now faces the same inflection point. Agile Geoscience applies these agile principles to the subsurface, replacing annual field campaigns with adaptive loops that sense, model, decide, and learn.”

     They note the development of agile methodologies in several industries and the potential of agile geoscience. Below, they give an agile geoscience workflow and compare agile geoscience results to traditional minerals exploration geoscience results



 



     They note that the core tenets of agile geoscience are velocity, integration, and adaptation. Velocity refers to how fast value can be added. Integration builds confidence as more data streams are combined and validated for geological modeling. Adaptation is vital for avoiding wasted time and effort. Adapting quickly to new information is very important for mineral exploration. The system utilizes AI and edge computing and integrates sensors and the Internet of Things (IoT). The system provides interoperability on a single platform.




     Fleet Space thinks legacy workflows are too slow for the current needs for mineral discoveries. As noted, ore grades are getting lower quality as the best grades are mined out. This has been the case for copper mining.

     Fleet Space is currently working with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to develop the country’s mineral resources.

In partnership with Fleet Space & Tahreez JV, Maaden is completing the world’s largest 3D multiphysics survey and AI-enabled drill targeting campaign across over 12,000km2 of the Arabian Shield to unlock the Kingdom’s 2.5 trillion in mineral assets in support of Vision 2030.”

     Fleet Space claims that agile geoscience is “reducing drill costs up to 60% and improving success rates up to 4X worldwide.”



Q2 Metals Cisco Lithium Project

          Q2 Metals’ Cisco Lithium Project in the Eeyou Istchee James Bay region of Quebec is exploring for lithium in a pegmatite deposit and has announced excellent drilling results utilizing Fleet Space’s platform. Fleet Space is a company from Australia, a global mining leader. Its CEO describes Q2 Metals’ success:

 “Around the world, agile geoscience is helping exploration teams move from insight to results with unprecedented speed, precision, and reduced environmental impact,” said CEO & Co-Founder of Fleet Space, Flavia Tata Nardini. “With global mining leaders using ExoSphere’s real-time subsurface intelligence to refine drill targeting, we’re enabling faster, smarter, and more sustainable outcomes across the exploration and resource development cycle. We’re proud to support Q2 as they advance a project that has the potential to meaningfully strengthen the resilience of the Americas’ lithium supply chain.”

     Some details, location maps, pegmatite body ore quality, and geology of the Cisco Lithium Project are given below.  

 















 

References:

 

A huge lithium deposit in Canada may have just been found thanks to AI satellites. Nadeem Sarwar. Slash Gear. January 3, 2025. A huge lithium deposit in Canada may have just been found thanks to AI satellites

Fleet Space. Website. Fleet Space Technologies | Home Page

Agile Geoscience: The 21st Century Playbook for Mineral Discovery. Fleet Space (White Paper).  Fleet Space Technologies_Agile Geoscience_2026.pdf

Cisco Lithium Project Eeyou Istchee James Bay Region of Quebec. Q2 Metals Corp. Cisco Lithium Project - Q2 Metals Corp.

Agile Geoscience: The Global Mining Innovation Priority for 21st Century Leaders. Flavia Tata Nardini, CEO & Co-Founder, Fleet Space Technologies. Fleet Space (website). January 14, 2026. Agile Geoscience: The Global Mining Innovation Priority for 21st Century Leaders

ExoSphere Supports Q2 Metals’ Expanded Mineralisation at Cisco Project. Fleet Space (website). November 25. 2025. ExoSphere Supports Q2 Metals’ Expanded Mineralisation at Cisco Project

Q2 Metals Defines Initial Exploration Target of 215 to 329 Million Tonnes at the Cisco Lithium Project in James Bay, Quebec, Canada. Q2 Metals. Press Release. July 21, 2025. Q2 Metals Defines Initial Exploration Target of 215 to 329 Million Tonnes at the Cisco Lithium Project in James Bay, Quebec, Canada  - Q2 Metals Corp.

 

 

Sunday, January 18, 2026

Redevelopment of Mature Oil and Gas Fields: Baker Hughes and Hunt Oil Announce Joint Framework


     In Mid-December 2025, Baker Hughes and Hunt Oil Company announced a joint framework for the global evaluation and redevelopment of mature oil & gas fields. One goal is to extend the productive life of prolific oil & gas basins. According to the announcement from Baker Hughes:

Under the agreement, Baker Hughes will pair its industry-leading technologies, subsurface insights and expertise in mature assets solutions with Hunt’s world-wide experience in upstream exploration, development and operations. Together, the companies will collaborate to identify and evaluate opportunities to extend the productive life of some of the world’s most prolific basins.”

The redevelopment of mature fields is increasingly vital to the future of global energy. Industry forecasts indicate that by 2030, approximately 80% of oil and gas output will come from mature assets. Leveraging advanced technologies and targeted redevelopment strategies can unlock new value, optimize recovery, and extend the productive life of these fields.”

     As a geologist, I have worked on a few projects, hoping to redevelop mature fields. In the mid-1990s, a company, Meridian Exploration, tried to redevelop oil fields in the Trenton Limestone in Western Ohio and Northeastern Indiana. I worked as a mudlogger on a couple of those wells, but that particular venture was not successful, partially due to field depletion and the many unplugged or improperly plugged wells drilled in the early 1900s at very close spacing. However, with today’s technology, even those very old fields and others like them could possibly be redeveloped. Issues impeding redevelopment, especially of older fields, include pressure depletion, poor infrastructure, and questionable economics.

     EPCIntel.com writes that the joint framework will provide project opportunities and attract investment to these brownfield projects.

Redevelopment is increasingly the cheapest barrel available. Brownfield infill drilling, artificial lift upgrades, compression additions, water handling debottlenecking and targeted EOR schemes all deliver incremental production at breakevens far below most frontier projects.”

In mature field redevelopments, Baker Hughes typically sits across several value layers. Early phase subsurface re interpretation and production diagnostics feed into concept selection. That then cascades into well workovers, new wells, surface facility upgrades and long term O&M contracts.”




     EPCIntel.com benchmarks mature field redevelopment programs and sees these projects having capex needs of $200 million to $800 million per asset. They divide the needed capex as follows.




     A graphical representation of that cost breakdown is below.


Data source: EPCIntel.com


     They also note that mature field redevelopment is likely to move from niche investments to core investments, presumably as suitable opportunities are found.

Mid-tier EPCs, modular fabricators, compressor package suppliers, digital solution providers and well services companies are the most likely beneficiaries. Local contractors in mature basins should also expect increased activity as Hunt and Baker Hughes move from evaluation into execution.”

Importantly, these projects often progress quickly once sanctioned, with shorter cycles from concept to first oil compared to greenfield developments.”

Expect to see specific projects, regional pilots and eventually bundled EPC and services awards emerge from this collaboration. When they do, they are likely to look modest individually, but substantial in aggregate, exactly the kind of work that keeps the global EPC machine busy in a capital disciplined upstream world.”

     How does mature field redevelopment look, and what makes it up? According to Oil & Gas Technology, creating value from mature field redevelopment involves the following:

Redeveloping mature fields typically involves a combination of improved reservoir characterization, targeted infill drilling, enhanced recovery techniques, and optimization of existing infrastructure. Advanced data analytics and subsurface modeling play a central role in identifying bypassed hydrocarbons and prioritizing interventions with the highest return.”

Within the broader energy landscape, mature asset redevelopment is increasingly viewed as a pragmatic pathway to meet near- and medium-term energy demand while operators balance capital discipline, resource efficiency, and emissions considerations.”

     It should be interesting to see where these projects will occur and how successful they will be.

  

 


References:

 

Baker Hughes, Hunt Announce Joint Framework for Redevelopment of Mature Oil and Gas Fields. Baker Hughes. December 15, 2025. Baker Hughes, Hunt Announce Joint Framework for Redevelopment of Mature Oil and Gas Fields | Baker Hughes

Redeveloping Mature Oil and Gas Assets; Baker Hughes and Hunt Oil Company establish a framework to evaluate and extend production from mature oil and gas fields worldwide through technology-led redevelopment. Baker Hughes. Oil & Gas Technology. December 16, 2025. Redeveloping Mature Oil and Gas Assets | Oil Gas Technology

Baker Hughes and Hunt Oil Company join forces to redevelop mature oil & gas fields. EPCIntel.com. December 17, 2025. Baker Hughes and Hunt Oil Company join forces to redevelop mature oil & gas fields

Arsenic-Rich Sludge from Groundwater Treatment and Mine Tailings Waste Can Be Chemically Converted to Amorphous Metallic Arsenic for Use as a Semiconductor Metal


      Scientists at the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland have developed a chemical process that converts toxic arsenic waste into metallic arsenic for semiconductors, batteries, and other clean energy technologies. Arsenic waste exists in the residues left after groundwater treatment, which is one source of the waste. Another is mine tailings, mainly from gold and copper mines. I wrote about strong correlations between arsenic in groundwater and cancer rates a few months ago. The region around the Netherlands is well-known to have groundwater with high arsenic content. Thus, dealing with this waste in a way that makes it both inert and useful is a desirable outcome. This includes decreasing environmental risks.

Arsenic has been considered a toxic contaminant for decades. It’s known as the King of Poisons and the Poison of Kings,” says Case van Genuchten, lead author on the recent publication.




     The U.S. and the E.U. now consider arsenic to be a critical mineral. Thus, recovering it from waste can have value, as well as reduce alternative disposal and mitigation costs and decrease environmental impacts. There is a significant amount of arsenic waste around the world, and those locations would benefit from its removal from the environment. 

     The arsenic is transformed in a chemical process, “via a two-stage process of alkali extraction and selective reduction.” The final product is what is known as a glassy metal instead of a crystalline metal. Glassy metals can have desirable electrical and mechanical properties. The resulting material was studied at the Canadian Light Source at the University of Saskatchewan. They used specialized tools to examine the atomic structure of the glassy arsenic, also known as amorphous metallic arsenic. The analysis confirmed that the glassy arsenic material meets industrial requirements. Amorphous arsenic is stable and easier to store, handle, and transport than crystalline arsenic, which makes it a desirable product. It is also chemically easier to combine it with “other compounds or thin films, which could make it a better feedstock for producing electronic or optical materials.”

     A diagram of the two-stage process of sludge production and valorization is shown below.




     An article in Chemical & Engineering News explains the process of recovering arsenic from groundwater and turning it into glassy arsenic. The research was reported in the journal Scientific Advances in October 2025.




Most water treatment plants remove arsenic from groundwater by adding iron ions that oxidize in the water and turn to rust. These rust particles bind to arsenic and eventually settle into a dense, reddish sludge at the bottom of treatment tanks. This waste is rich in arsenic and phosphorus, which are chemically bound to the surfaces of the rust particles.”

Kaifeng Wang and Case van Genuchten at the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland recover the arsenic from this sludge by washing it with a concentrated alkaline solution. This process breaks the chemical bonds between arsenic, phosphate, and the iron oxides, releasing the arsenic and phosphate into the liquid. When the mixture is heated and treated with thiourea dioxide, the dissolved arsenic compounds are reduced to elemental arsenic, which separates as fine metallic particles. The phosphate remains dissolved and can be recovered separately by treatment with calcium.”




     Recovering phosphate is another bonus of the process since it, too, is a valuable commodity. This aids the economics of the process.

     The next step is to test the process at scale. Another challenge to overcome will be recycling the reagents. Since water treatment plants are a major source of arsenic from waste, they can be converted, in a real sense, to amorphous arsenic refineries.

    



References:

 

New chemical process turns toxic arsenic sludge into semiconductor material. Aamir Khollam. Interesting Engineering. January 15, 2026. New chemical process turns toxic arsenic sludge into semiconductor material    

Recovering arsenic from wastewater sludge: A 2-step process transforms toxic waste to high-purity elemental arsenic. Ananya Palivela. American Chemical Society. Chemical & Engineering News, October 17, 2025. Recovering arsenic from wastewater sludge

Commodifying a carcinogen: Critical raw materials from arsenic-laden groundwater. Kaifeng Wang and Case M. van Genuchten. Science Advances. 15 Oct 2025. Vol 11, Issue 42. Commodifying a carcinogen: Critical raw materials from arsenic-laden groundwater | Science Advances

Saturday, January 17, 2026

Many Home Power-Saving Devices are Scams, Yet Heavily Advertised: Alternatives That Do Work Include Smart Plugs and Smart Power Strips


     Most of us have seen those ads for small devices that are claimed to be able to lower one’s electric bill. Most of those are flat-out scams, according to those who have examined and tested them. Some are blatantly fake, basically fraudulent. The companies that sell these fraudulent devices should be penalized.  

     An article in ZDNET explains that many of these power-saving devices are outright frauds. The author says, “Don’t Buy Them.”

Scam "power saving" devices are rampant online. These devices plug into an outlet and promise to "improve the use of energy," "extend the life of electrical equipment," and even "avoid illegal electrical waste."


   

  It is also noted that some are repurposed from other scam items!

Many of these units seem to be repurposed cases for rodent repellers, and coincidentally, many of those are also scam devices.”

     The author, Adrian Kingsley-Hughes, also says that some of these devices are so badly made that they could cause a fire. He bought and tested several of these devices. Again, he emphasizes that they do nothing at all to save power use. As indicated in the pics below, the devices are often made to look authentic, even having fake testing numbers.







     And when they were opened up, some were found with fake capacitors. The arrow in the second pic below points to the fake capacitor.






     The author does recommend smart power strips and smart plugs. These can be operated from one’s phone, turning outlets on and off. He shows one from a company called Tapo.






    The devices enable the management of electricity, allowing one to monitor the power consumption of the devices that are attached. However, they also use a little bit of energy. I would think that their function and effects are similar to those of smart thermostats. They can help you save a bit of energy overall by turning outlets off more often when not in use, since many things left plugged in can drain small amounts of power that can cumulatively add up.  

   

 

References:

 

I tested power-saving devices that promise lower electricity bills - only one was legit. Adrian Kingsley-Hughes. ZDNET. January 15, 2026. I tested power-saving devices that promise lower electricity bills - only one was legit

         This was an interesting book, sometimes fun. It is focused on strategy in a business world prone to disruptions and changing cond...