Blog Archive

Wednesday, October 29, 2025

Human Betterment Spending Should Not Be Eclipsed by Climate Spending: Echoing Bill Gates’ Memo


     Bill Gates’ latest memo in his Gates Notes is about the realities of addressing climate change. First, he notes that climate change will not cause humanity’s demise, which means that it is not an existential threat (as Biden annoyingly liked to say). He says that the doomsday outlook is causing too much emphasis on short-term emissions reduction goals. Regarding the upcoming COP30 meeting in Brazil, he notes:

This is a chance to refocus on the metric that should count even more than emissions and temperature change: improving lives. Our chief goal should be to prevent suffering, particularly for those in the toughest conditions who live in the world’s poorest countries.”

     Simply put, he confirms that poverty and disease are more pressing problems than climate change. The need for prioritizing funding is urgent as many countries face budget constraints. He says that we should deal with human problems in proportion to the suffering they cause. Indeed, we should. For this post, he gives three truths that will help us prioritize:

 

Truth #1 – Climate change is a serious problem, but it will not be the end of civilization

     The following graph shows possible temperature scenarios to 2100.




     He notes that in any scenario, energy use will grow, and that is a good thing for lowering poverty.

From the standpoint of improving lives, using more energy is a good thing, because it’s so closely correlated with economic growth.”




     Gates is still optimistic about the ability of technology and innovation to provide more affordable, cleaner energy and to reduce emissions, if we make the right investments and adopt supportive policies.

All countries will be able to construct buildings with low-carbon cement and steel. Almost all new cars will be electric. Farms will be more productive and less destructive, using fertilizer created without generating any emissions. Power grids will deliver clean electricity reliably, and energy costs will go down.”

     He notes the observed phenomenon of latitude creep, which means higher latitudes will continue to get warmer and seasons will be longer, which also allows species to migrate, generally further north in the Northern Hemisphere. As a gardener and outdoor person, I have noticed this, and you are likely to have noticed too. It is undeniable. Insects and plants are expanding their biological ranges, as are diseases. He is optimistic that innovation will curb climate change because it already has, as shown below.




     Gates talks about reducing the Green Premium, the cost difference between emissions-intensive technology and emissions-free technology. He thinks we will continue to reduce it, and technology breakthroughs will lead the way. Below, he shows the five sources of emissions.




     Regarding electricity, he cites new generation possibilities like geothermal and new advanced transmission technologies like highly efficient power lines that can transmit much more electricity with the same materials and space. He sees nuclear fission getting better with new designs set to come online in the coming years. He thinks we need to continue to advance both fission and fusion.  

     Next is manufacturing. He notes that low emissions, steel, and cement are now possible and may be economical where clean energy sources are cheap and available. They need to scale up where possible. He thinks hydrogen might play a big role in manufacturing eventually, especially if natural hydrogen discoveries pan out. I am a bit more skeptical at present, but it is possible. He also notes CCUS, long thought to be the primary way to decarbonize industry, is progressing, albeit slowly.

     Agricultural emissions can be reduced with solutions like low-emissions fertilizers, which are already available at low cost. He also notes that additives can help cattle produce less greenhouse gas emissions. However, I am skeptical since those additives have also been shown in the past to reduce the amount of meat the cows can produce, which negatively affects economics and emissions. This could change in the future, however, with new additives. He notes that rice cultivation can be tweaked to be less methane emissions-intensive and more productive. He does acknowledge, however, the difficulty of slowing nitrous oxide emissions from the ag sector.

     Regarding transportation, he notes that about 25% of cars sold in 2024 were EVs (mostly in China) and that 10% of all vehicles in the world are now EVs. The sector still has many challenges, including aviation and shipping fuel emissions and battery costs. These are all being explored, and new innovations are expected in the coming years.

     Building emissions currently make up 7% of global emissions, but are expected to rise as urbanization and access to air conditioning continue to increase. Heat pumps are one solution among several, and new, efficient models are hitting the market with some that are easy to install. He also cites innovations in building sealants and super-efficient windows.

 

Truth #2 – Temperature is not the best way to measure our progress on climate

     Here, he first notes that quality of life is the key metric for assessing human problems, citing the UN’s Human Development Index (HDI). He notes that about 1/8 or 12.5% of the global population lives in the 30 countries with the lowest HDI score. This means that human welfare is not up to par in a big chunk of the world and needs our help in the form of aid, education, energy, electricity, healthcare, etc. He also cites problematic issues with trying to address poor countries' needs by the often-unfair goal of “leapfrogging” energy to clean sources, bypassing fossil fuels, which may offer more economical and local solutions. The pressure to reduce emissions should not eclipse basic needs. I am glad he acknowledges this.

Sometimes the pressure comes from outsiders. For example, multilateral lenders have been pushed by wealthy shareholders to stop financing fossil fuel projects, with the hope of limiting emissions by leaving oil, gas, and coal in the ground. This pressure has had almost no impact on global emissions, but it has made it harder for low-income countries to get low-interest loans for power plants that would bring reliable electricity to their homes, schools, and health clinics.”

 

Truth #3 – Health and prosperity are the best defense against climate change

     Here, he cites data that suggests economic growth in developing countries will be able to prevent many deaths that in the future could be attributed to climate change. Improved agriculture and technologies that can improve crop yields, including better weather forecasting, can help. Better crop and livestock breeding will also help.

     He notes that deaths due to heat will rise and indirect deaths due to natural disasters will rise, even though deaths from cold far outnumber deaths from heat, and direct deaths from natural disasters continue to drop. Better warning systems and more resilient buildings have led to fewer direct deaths due to natural disasters. He notes that people are more likely to die from indirect effects of natural disasters, such as floods, from cholera, rotavirus, and the diarrhea they cause, rather than dying from drowning in a flood. Low-income countries are very susceptible to these indirect killings. Poverty also means a greater likelihood of death from diseases that rich countries have been able to lower very significantly.

What I am saying is that we should deal with disease and extreme weather in proportion to the suffering they cause, and that we should go after the underlying conditions that leave people vulnerable to them. While we need to limit the number of extremely hot and cold days, we also need to make sure that fewer people live in poverty and poor health so that extreme weather isn’t such a threat to them.”

     He cites new technologies, such as AI, being enabled to help improve healthcare and agriculture. He also notes that as childhood survival rates increase, people will be content to have smaller families.

     Next in the memo, Gates gives two priorities in the quest for human welfare, noting that in most cases, development is adaptation.

 

Priority #1 - Drive the Green Premium to zero

     Here, he suggests that instead of just emissions reduction pledges at COP30, there should be representatives of each of the five sectors that report on progress in their respective sectors and discuss those with their peers in those sectors from other countries. Below are calculated Green Premiums for concrete, steel, and aviation fuel.  





Priority #2 - Be rigorous about measuring impact

     Here, he says that we need to focus on the highest returns for delivering human welfare. He also notes:

Vaccines are the undisputed champion of lives saved per dollar spent.”

     He notes that malaria prevention also offers a great human welfare return on investment. Everything should be evaluated in terms of human welfare impact. He also says that the benefits of energy innovation, however, will be mostly in the future:

Energy innovation is a good buy not because it saves lives now, but because it will provide cheap clean energy and eventually lower emissions, which will have large benefits for human welfare in the future.”

 

The Future

     Finally, he likens the current time to thirty years ago when he wrote a Microsoft memo to focus on the internet, which was new then. Now, he says, prioritizing actions that lead to the most human welfare should be our main focus.

     According to Bloomberg:

Speaking on CNBC on Tuesday morning, Gates said his latest assessment of the climate problem was partly motivated by cuts to aid budgets made by the Trump administration and other rich countries. “The plea here is to say, OK, let’s take that very limited money and not have some partitioned off for particular causes.” He described the US government’s decision to cut climate and clean energy programs a “huge disappointment.”

Gates said his views on the necessity of the Paris climate agreement and the need for companies to lower their emissions have not changed. “I’m a climate activist, but I’m also a child survival activist,” he said.

     His final statement in the memo urges prioritization:

So I urge that community, at COP30 and beyond, to make a strategic pivot: prioritize the things that have the greatest impact on human welfare. It’s the best way to ensure that everyone gets a chance to live a healthy and productive life no matter where they’re born, and no matter what kind of climate they’re born into.”

 

 

      

References:

 

Bill Gates Rejects ‘Doomsday’ View of Climate Change in Memo. Olivia Rudgard. Bloomberg. October 28, 2025. Bill Gates Rejects ‘Doomsday’ View of Climate Change in Memo

Three tough truths about climate: What I want everyone at COP30 to know. Bill Gates. Gates notes. October 28, 2025. A warmer world will hurt this group most | Bill Gates

No comments:

Post a Comment

     This webinar was mainly about the applications of deep learning networks trained on seismic attribute data in order to model CO2 plumes...