Rextag reports
that a massive gas leak occurred on April 9, 2024, in Southern Russia. They
reported: “The emission originated from the Gazprom-operated Krasnodar
Krai-Serpukhov Gas Pipeline near the Krasnodar and Rostov border in Russia, at
a small facility installed as part of an expansion project completed in early
2015 that appears to be a small metering or pipeline servicing station. This
pipeline segment is part of a multiple line right-of-way that serves the
TurkStream and Blue Stream pipelines, both of which export Russian gas to
Turkey.”
Russia has long
been at or near the top of countries leaking methane into the atmosphere. State-owned
Gazprom leaks are notorious. Now we have satellites that can better pinpoint
leak sources and better estimate leak rates. Carbon Mapper analyzed the
satellite data and estimated the Southern Russia leak at nearly 2BCF per hour,
the largest global leak recorded since 2016. The duration of the leak is
unknown but if it lasted one hour the following graphic shows some equivalent
emissions.
The leak occurred at a small metering station that serves
two large pipelines that deliver Russian gas to Turkey, the TurkStream and the
Blue Stream pipelines. Although the source of the leak is about 100 miles from
the front line of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, there is no evidence that the leak resulted from an attack.
The Gas Pipeline Explosion in the Saratov Region
On June 15, 2024,
a large gas pipeline explosion occurred in the Saratov region south of Moscow. Russian
authorities claimed that this was not the result of an attack or sabotage, but
a result of “abnormal heat” in the area that led to the pipeline losing
“tightness.” The gas line is a large trunkline. A different section of the same
trunkline suffered a similar explosion in September 2023. Although it is quite
common for Russian authorities to lie about event causes, it appears in this
case that the cause given is correct. Gazprom noted in their most recent
environmental report that three accidental trunkline leaks occurred in 2023,
including one that flared about 120 MMCF of gas.
Gazprom’s Woes and Strategies
Gazprom’s
production and finances have been hampered due to sanctions and that may result
in less emphasis on safety. Gazprom’s exports to EU countries in particular
have sunk and will likely continue to sink, even though there are sometimes
increases due to imports of both Russian pipeline gas and LNG to more “friendly”
countries like Hungary and Turkey. Before the conflict, Gazprom was in
excellent financial health with revenues expected to remain robust and increase
further with the Nordstream 2 line that was expected to supply Germany. Russian strategy
has been to evade sanctions as much as possible and to supply discounted gas
and oil to China, India, and a few other countries. This has helped them fund
the war effort. Gazprom reports that it may take more than a decade to recover
lost revenues as a result of the conflict and their prime focus will be
supplying gas to Asia. Before the war, Putin was openly using natural gas as a
weapon, restricting flows to influence prices and other mafia-style
shenanigans. Sanctions have also meant that turbines to move the gas through
the pipelines and spare parts are cut off or hard to find. Russian LNG exports via
state-owned Novatek are expected to grow and eventually eclipse pipeline exports.
However, the constraint on parts and technology could hamper Russian LNG growth
as well.
The Russia-Ukraine War is Exacting a Huge
Environmental Toll
Russia has
managed to damage or destroy all the gas-fired power plants in Ukraine in a
deliberate effort to deprive people of basic necessities, an undisputable war
crime. Ukraine has also bombed some Russian energy infrastructure, mostly oil infrastructure,
in an effort to disrupt the Russian war economy and fuel supply for the war. Ukraine
has been using drones to strike oil storage depots. These are mostly legitimate
war targets.
From an
emissions perspective, pipeline gas is much better than LNG. Thus, argued some,
the Nordstream 2 was a smart choice for Germany and the other countries that
would have benefitted from it. Unfortunately, the Kremlin would rather make
Russia a country that cheats, manipulates, invades other countries, and is
wholly untrustworthy on the international stage. Due to this behavior, the
Europeans had no choice but to disavow Russian hydrocarbons. If countries like
India, China, and Turkey would cooperate more to support the sanctions, that
could help cut off the war financing. The proposed Siberia 2 pipeline to China,
not yet even fully agreed upon, will not displace lost European gas revenue,
especially as the negotiated pricing is much lower than the European pricing
was. That line is expected to supply about 4.8BCF per day to China but it will
be years before it is in service.
Of course,
Ukrainian drone attacks on Russian oil depots also damage the environment and
increase emissions. However, they also slow down the enemy invaders getting
much-needed fuel to the front lines. Other events, like the Russian bombing of
the dam in Southern Ukraine, have been very environmentally destructive.
References:
Exclusive:
Rextag Reports on Massive Gas Pipeline Leak. Rextag. June 11. 2024. Exclusive:
Rextag Reports on Massive Gas Pipeline Leak
Russian
gas pipeline hit by explosion and fire nine months after similar incident. Vladimir
Afanasiev. Upstream Online. June 17, 2024. Russian
gas pipeline hit by explosion and fire nine months after similar incident |
Upstream (upstreamonline.com)
Fire
at drone-hit Russian oil depot rages for second day. Reuters. June 19, 2024. Fire
at drone-hit Russian oil depot rages for second day (msn.com)
Gazproms
Struggles: The Impact Of The Ukraine War On Russias Gas Giant. Brett Hurll.
Global Financial Market Review. June 5, 2024. Gazproms
Struggles: The Impact Of The Ukraine War On Russias Gas Giant - Global
Financial Market Review (gfmreview.com)
Russia's
Gas Giant Reports Costly Impact of Putin's War. Brendan Cole. Newsweek. June 5,
2024. Russia's
Gas Giant Reports Costly Impact of Putin's War - Newsweek
No comments:
Post a Comment