Saturday, May 2, 2026

The Importance of Source Rocks in Hydrocarbons Exploration: AAPG’s Rasoul Sorkhabi Explains


      AAPG editor Rasoul Sorkhabi wrote an article for AAPG Explorer about source rocks, specifically “generative” source rocks, since not all source rocks generate producible hydrocarbons. He defines generative source rocks as follows:

A generative (or an effective) petroleum source rock is a clay-rich or carbonate sedimentary rock that has generated, or is generating, and has expelled, or is expelling, oil and/or gas.”

     Recently, I learned about (and blogged about) an exception, where a very good oil & gas basin offshore Indonesia has sandstone source rocks that carried leaf and coal fragments via turbiditic currents. That, however, was an unusual situation, quite rare.

     He reviews what makes a petroleum system, and below gives seven “grades: of source rock.




Source rock with trap, seal, reservoir, and migration pathways is what constitutes the petroleum system.”  

     He notes that source rock investigations are very important for shale plays, which are “self-sourced” in that the source rocks and the reservoir rocks are one and the same. Even some shale plays are not viable due to hydrocarbons migrating out of the source rocks. I remember when American shale plays were being explored after the advent of successful high-volume hydraulic fracturing and horizontal wells. There was one potential play in Alabama’s Black Warrior Basin, the Floyd Shale, in which were found what are known as “dead oil stains,” indicative of oil that was once in the reservoir but no longer present. It was considered highly prospective since it met most of the requirements for a good source rock. The problem with the Floyd Shale is thought to be a loss of reservoir seal, which allowed much of the hydrocarbons to move out of the shale reservoir. Other evidence of this includes the lack of overpressure in the shale.

    Sorkhabi notes that carbon, or TOC, alone is insufficient. TOC changes with thermal maturity. Hydrogen index (HI), determined by pyrolysis, combined with adequate TOC, is a better overall indicator of hydrocarbon yield.

     He mentions two methodologies found in the literature that can evaluate source rock potential:

Researchers Gerard Demaison and Bradley Huizinga suggest using the Source Potential Index (SPI). This index combines rock thickness and density with potential yield (a sum of S1, free hydrocarbon, and S2, generated hydrocarbon in pyrolysis) and then calculates metric tons of hydrocarbon per square meter.”

Another research team, Andrew Pepper and Elizabeth Roller, suggest using the Ultimate Expellable Potential (UEP) metric, which integrates rock thickness and density with TOC, HI, transformation ratio, and oil versus gas components to estimate generated and expelled oil volume.”

Basin modeler Zhiyong He of ZetaWare considers both metrics useful in their own ways. SPI gives mass, and UEB gives the volume of source hydrocarbons. Both SPI and UEP help create generative maps laid over the depositional span of source rock formations.”

     Other methodologies include determining oil mobility and expulsion efficiency, and determining original TOC and HI values through maturity and statistical analysis.

     Sorkhabi explores the importance of kerogen typification. Kerogen is the insoluble organic matter that is cracked via burial heat and pressure. Its type is based on thermal maturity, which indicates what hydrocarbons the rocks will produce, whether oil, condensate, or natural gas. He discusses the Van Krevelen diagram or cross-plot of atomic hydrogen-to-carbon and oxygen-to-carbon ratios, originally developed to determine coal ranks, and the limitations of this diagram.

To address these issues, geochemists suggest organo-facies (visual kerogen) analysis. Another technique is to analyze S2 peak materials from pyrolysis by gas chromatography.”

     Below is his concise analysis of thermal maturity:



     Source rock analysis is in the realm of petroleum geochemistry, and he says there is still much more to learn about it. He gives two current challenges to understanding via source rock analysis and basin modeling:

1)        “Well data are location-specific. The deep hydrocarbon kitchen would be the last space to drill, or it may remain undrilled, even after a long production history from reservoirs.”

2)        “Validating the results of source rock evaluation applied to a basin is tricky. Reservoir oil to source rock fingerprinting using age-diagnostic or facies-diagnostic biomarkers obtained from gas chromatography-mass spectrometry can be helpful to some extent, but such data are usually scarce.”

   

    

 

References:

 

How to Spot Generative Source Rocks: A review of proposed evaluation methods and criteria. Rasoul Sorkhabi. AAPG Explorer. April 1, 2026. How to Spot Generative Source Rocks

Lessons learned from the Floyd shale play. Harry Dembicki Jr. and Jonathan D. Madren. Journal of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources. Volume 7, September 2014, Pages 1-10. Lessons learned from the Floyd shale play - ScienceDirect

No comments:

Post a Comment

              The Energy Information Administration (EIA) has long done a good job explaining the details of gasoline types and differen...