Capex for utility-scale solar had been dropping steadily
until 2022 when those costs rose for the first time in decades. In mid-2022 insurance
provider kWh Analytics did a cost-analysis in that year’s Solar
Risk Assessment report. They concluded that grid-scale solar remains
plagued by underperformance issues. Performance remains below expectations. According
to Liam Stoker of PV Tech, the assessment: “cites new research confirming
that system degradation, inverter availability and overly-optimistic PV
modelling have meant that the solar industry has “significantly
overestimated” expectations of solar assets and, as a result, will need to
“reckon the realities in the field with the assumptions we use on paper”. Along
with those issues, other issues were analyzed that contribute to local and
regional solar underperformance, including topography and uneven terrain
(up to 6% performance losses) and extreme weather events such as hail
and wildfire smoke. Wildfire smoke led to as much as 3% annual soil–related
performance losses at solar PV sites in California between 2018 and 2020. Operational
risks include inverter performance and inverter service support problems.
Overall, the study identified by far the largest underperformance issue as financial
modeling risk, which is routinely overly optimistic. kWh noted: “92% of
lost EBITDA is due to underproduction, dwarfing all other sources of risk.”
In the same
report, Solargis, a solar resource data company, recently analyzed “annual
global horizontal irradiation (“GHI”) compared to long-term averages, finding
significant resource variability in North America over a period of 23 years
from 1999 to 2021.” They concluded that annual solar irradiation is 10%
below long-term averages in several U.S. regions.
One problem
with inverters contributing to operational risk is inverters abandoned by manufacturers
who discontinue models and go out of business. Solar operation & maintenance
company Solar Support noted in the same report that solar facilities with
discontinued inverters from manufacturers no longer in business perform at an average
of 85% technical availability whereas the industry standard goal is 97-99%
power plant availability. Grid solar operator NovaSource, also in the same
report, reported that inverters were underperforming compared to expectations during
their 2-year warranty period. They concluded that inverters underperformed by 40%
during the 2-year warranty period. NovaSource found average inverter failure
incidences at about 1 per year per inverter (0.8-1.4 times /year). That is not
a large problem by itself, but one must also calculate mean-time-to-repair
(MTTR) in order to evaluate effects on technical availability. Again, and
surprisingly, inverters under warranty performed worse and required more time
to repair. Suggested strategies for improving the problems include better
inverter testing before large deployment, developing an inventory of standardized
parts and expertise to speed up repair times, and enabling O&M companies to
perform some repairs to decrease down time.
Underperformance from uneven terrain that increases shading can be
addressed with more advanced tracking and better modeling. DNV calculated up to
6% of losses from uneven terrain, much of which can be reduced.
There are some
other issues that lead to underperformance such as Balance of System anomalies
associated mostly with large and complex systems. String anomalies were the
most common, but inverter, combiner, module, and tracker anomalies also affect performance.
Digital Analytics company Raptor Maps, in the same report, concluded that these
types of anomalies led to 2.63% underperformance in 2021, up from 1.85% in 2020.
Basic system
degradation results in efficiency losses that the NREL calculates at an average
of 0.75% per year. This is based on 4915 inverters being analyzed and with a
total of more than 7.2 GW under observation monitoring for long-term performance.
Manufacturing
changes can affect system degradation. In solar module manufacturing, doping
with gallium instead of boron has improved the problem of destabilization but
has also led to faster degradation. This will require more research, says PV Evolution
Labs, also part of the study.
Current
ongoing supply chain issues can also have negative effects on quality control/quality
assurance. Better inspection, testing, and further QC/QA may be needed.
Analytics company
UL Solutions noted that the recent study concludes that solar underperformance compared
to pre-construction estimates is at 6.3% on average and that 3-4% of that lost
energy is recoverable as the problems that lead to it are addressable. UL
Solutions provides monitoring, production key performance indicators (KPIs),
analytics, and reporting.
The kWh solar
assessment report also showed that actual production vs. P50 estimates have
been getting further apart in recent years despite improvements in module and
system efficiencies through the years. A December 2022 article in PV Tech by Jonathan
Touriño Jacobo notes: “… the underperformance trend remains a nationwide
issue with average lifetime performance ranging from 5-10% below initial P50
estimates across the US, with the exception in 2021 of the Northwest and
Southeast regions which improved by 1% and 2%, respectively.”
References:
US
solar remains beset by underperformance issues as capex costs on the rise. Liam
Stoker. PV Tech. June 14, 2022. US solar remains beset by
underperformance issues as capex costs on the rise - PV Tech (pv-tech.org)
Analytics
and expertise to assess, optimize and report on operational performance. UL
Solutions (website). 2023. Operational Performance Assessment
For Solar Assets | UL Solutions
US
solar assets ‘are not meeting performance expectations’, kWh Analytics says. Jonathan
Touriño Jacobo. PV Tech. December 7, 2022. US solar assets ‘are not meeting
performance expectations’, kWh Analytics says (pv-tech.org)
Solar
Risk Assessment: 2022: Quantitative Insights from the Industry Experts. kWh
Analytics. Solar
Risk Assessment: 2022 Quantitative Insights from the Industry Experts
(squarespace.com)
No comments:
Post a Comment